Makes me sad they're completely shifting focus to the gay couple only in the spinoff

Makes me sad they're completely shifting focus to the gay couple only in the spinoff

Attached: p184561_b_v8_ab.jpg (960x1440, 135.43K)

Pretty sure it was a garbage show to begin with.

filtered

That show committed one of my cardinal sins of animation, so I couldn't give less of a shit about what they do to it.

That's kind of the big cultural push being made right now, we're coming into the scary territory where all the entertainment is being tailored to a smaller and smaller segment of people

What was that

I AM ALSO INTERESTED

Any time an animated show depicts humans, locations, and concepts that can easily and relatively inexpensively be done with real actors and sets with no, or next to no, change in overall delivery of the final product then it is a waste of the mediums potential to the point it is a sin.

I guess you don’t like this show either.

Attached: 805098D0-AA51-4EEF-8AB0-A7791AE22022.jpg (960x1440, 219.33K)

SHE DOESN'T CARE

Not particularly, but can respect it as being one of the few modern media examples of having a competent father figure instead of an abusive dick, complete idiot, or other negative example. Still, not a fan.

>animation needs to meet my weird set of credentials or they shouldn't be cartoons
maybe when you're older than 13 you'll learn to appreciate it

Attached: andy.gif (464x468, 521.12K)

I'm going to have disagree, I don't think there is anything wrong with a slice of show as long as the art style is pleasing and expressive

Getting older doesn't cure autism, unfortunately.

You are probably some faggot that thinks uber realistic still life is superior to a photo too.

Big gay is coming to take my cartoons away.

As long as they get some nice rule 34, especially Gus, I'll be okay.

I'm still looking forward to it
I loved the gay couple, they were great. Still think the better dynamic is of course the brothers but still. It's more mission hill. It could be dogshit and I'd STILL look forward to it.

Spin off?

>Any time an animated show depicts humans, locations, and concepts that can easily and relatively inexpensively be done with real actors and sets with no, or next to no, change in overall delivery of the final product then it is a waste of the mediums potential to the point it is a sin.

Attached: peggy deal.jpg (360x409, 50.45K)

laugh at this faggot

Yes.

>Thirsting over a married man

The dog eats the couch. Can you have a dog eat a couch IRL? Then one of the guys eats the couch, too.

Why is this scary? Mass appeal always strives for the blandest thing imaginable.

Except that exagerated poses, reactions, dream sequences, etc. cannot be made in real life.

You'd be right on the money.
That show sucked so hard, it didn't even finish it's first season.

stop talking like you think you know shit.
from this post alone I can tell you compare family slice of life to the likes of family guy/Simpsons, and decided the genre is shit.
if you don't like cartoon families just say so

I don't like cartoon families.

>clone high returning
>mission hill spinoff
>undergrads movie
Will Downtown be next?

fpwp