Why do artists intentionally draw ugly female characters? Is it to avoid traditional beauty standards...

Why do artists intentionally draw ugly female characters? Is it to avoid traditional beauty standards? Because every female character I see is an ugly, butterface or just very mannish.

Attached: 1457727307801.png (219x261, 71.98K)

In Henderson's case, it's because she really can't draw, simple as

What's everyone's excuse?

Wasn't there people arguing otherwise and that she did it on purpose to eliminate "male gaze" or was that just cope for lack of skill?

Cope

>she did it on purpose to eliminate "male gaze"
She failed

Attached: doreen green booty.png (625x385, 231.4K)

How do you even get a job for Marvel with these skills? Literally thousands of amateurs who have practiced drawing for a week could do better.

But those amateurs don’t know the right people.

You do know its not illegal to have your own artstyle, right?

Only when it's an ugly artstyle. If I wanted to see uggos, then I'd go outside.

See kids, Squirrel Girl was always hideous.

and artists aren't obligated to get my money if they only want to make garbage

This series has been over for years

Problem is, to really make a bank an independent internet artist usually has to mostly draw guro furry toddlercon vore mlp coprophilia cheese grater commissions. The ones who don't usually earn pittance.

>implying you pay for comics at all

>can't draw a normal looking person
>make a deformed abomination instead
>c-c-c-coomers btfo....

user, the op comic is Squirrel Girl. What you are saying is the definition of COPE.

>But would fanservice still benefit mainstream/official media nowadays?
Absolutely, people would actually pay attention to media made nowadays instead of going to anime or exclusively watching shit 15-20 years older like i do

It helps to lure in retards like you to condition you to jerk off to ugly women because that switches your brain to that being the new conventional beauty. Same for femdom looking women.

lol, they ain't conditioning me. Trust me user, I can tell the difference.

Problem is that watchdog groups are saying you can't or else. They're trying to police fanart as well as we speak.

>and the only way for artists to prevent perverts from make gross lewds of their ladies is to not draw them with coomer bait
Why though?

Literally just ignore them. They only have power because people kneel to them for woke points, just ignore them and act like they dont exist and what they say doesnt matter and make your lewd fan service content

That's a line that UBS 'defenders' would use, the funny thing is that it's a non-sequitur to other people. Like most of the things that these Woke people say.

There are Goddamn waychdog groups policing fanart you paranoid schizophrenic. Stop pretending you're so oppressed because 1 comic out of hundreds has ugly art.

It's a fact that the original was ugly and masculine, didn't even have breasts. How is it a non-sequitur?

Rise of TMNT's animator was in a cancelling attempt because he drew rule 34 of the TMNT on a private diacord. Some crazy fan got a leak of it and started a campaign to fire him for it.

It's obnoxious overcorrection. Like you've spent your whole life not liking a certain kind of character and now you're finally in power. YOU can make the characters. So you double down. You just subvert everything you grew up hating and feel satisfaction in doing that. But obviously that's gonna alienate people as well. But now your ego is so wrapped up in it that you feel personally slighted when people don't seem to be as fawned over your subversive artwork as you are. They must not be able to see it. Or even worse, they just actively hate anything that shakes up the status quo. So you double down and your drawings get more stylized and more weird looking until they're almost a caricature of itself. Your art becoming for of an extension of your desire of individuality and represent something than have it necessarily be aesthetically pleasing. Obviously this is not the only art style guilty of this but it's probably the most obvious and the most recent.

Attached: 1495142331787.png (1113x1069, 271.82K)

So adult cartoons with their ugly styles and stuff like Clasky-Ksupo should be outlawed?

We can't have tits or ass at Marvel

In the old comics though, everyone else looked relatively normal compared to Squirrel Girl. In Erica's comic, everyone looked deformed, not just her.

Clasky ksupo was cancer

Again, you're not being oppressed because some guy got shit for drawing porn. What did you expect, everyone on Twitter would suck him off in gratitude?

Unlike men that jerk off to fictional characters, even the ugliest fattest feminazi can still find people wanting to fuck/date/marry them. Never understood this "argument".

You have shit taste

He wasn't going about like an attention whire though. He kept it to the private Discord for a reason.

So what, you're saying fans have the right to destroy his life over it upon finding out?

The short answer is that it's a fetish

Destroy his life? LOL. Nothing ended up happening because no one cared.

I just want to coom to Squirrel Girl's booba. Is that too much to ask from Marvel artists?

That still diesn't explain why places like Bikini Armour Battle Damage and /mendrawingwomen subreddit exist, where they do nothing but A-log hentai artists.

See, this is an example of latching on to things with no significance, that have meaning only to your mind. I can remember the 2014 days on social media but someone who didn't would just wonder why you're yelling about a drawn character being ugly.

The keyword is "tried". It only stopped because someone pointed out that the one starting the cancellation attempt was into babyfur shit.