i forgot Zig Forums doesn't read comics and just LARPs about DC industry gossip based and seethes about diversity
Liam Edwards
WRONG
it failed simply because all the costume redesigns and artist switches for the main characters sucked. Remember hobo Hal?Brett Booth red logo Barry for synergy immmediately after the TV show changed it to fit the comics? Wonder Woman with pants and spikes?
Julian Rodriguez
>muh costume designs this seems like the criticism of someone who didn't actually read it and just reacted to previews of art
Samuel Rivera
All these books were good
Zachary Powell
I’m a coomer and loved the costume Hal also was dope
I agree. I loved it as well as Rebirth for completely different reasons, but DCYou was fantastic, and was some of the most creatively exciting content I've seen come from DC over the couple decades I've paid attention to it's active publishing
Those were fine. But the fact that they did nothing to boost the main line was what made it such a failure compared to Marvel Now or All-New or whatever they were on.
Asher Cox
Did you not enjoy Gotham by Midnight? It was one of my favorites.
Elijah Anderson
Greg Pak's Action Comics & Batman/Superman Midnighter Batgirl of Burnside is divisive but it was better than the New 52 Batgirl Black Canary Robin: Son of Batman We Are Robin Gotham Girls Ben Percy's Green Arrow Martian Manhunter
Adrian Harris
But none of those characters even reach up as far as D-list Gotham villains. The likes of Zsasz or Firefly are more intriguing.
DC needs to just accept that they've got Bats and Superman but all their other heroes are bit part players, especially the diversity quota malware.
It's in their villains is where the stories, money, and fans are waiting.
Dominic Richardson
>especially the diversity quota malware opinion discarded
Thomas Thompson
DCMe?
Brandon Foster
>Gotham Girls meant to say Gotham Academy
And Grayson might as well be a DCYou book
Benjamin Walker
It was good and a much better attempt than what Marvel were doing similarly at the time, but it made the same central mistake of not separating itself enough from the stigmatized part of the comics line.
People who have some interest in "getting into" monthly comics have zero interest in anything that is different from the status quo. You might be able to sell them on Superman and Batman by saying these are epic storylines that will be remembered years later or whatever, but that will be especially hard if they're coming out of a movie.
The kind of reader who would be interested in something like Starfire, Gotham Academy, and Batgirl will never buy a physical comic monthly, in a shop, ever. Even digital is a hard prospect with how little you get for your money. Which is why the OGNs have been such a success in comparison.
The stuff like Midnighter, Grayson, We Are Robin, etc. clearly designed to sell in TPB format NEED word of mouth from comics readers and social media to sell, and your typical comics reader is notoriously closed-minded to comics of this type (that is: without long-established characters, with downplayed superhero trappings, with obscure characters with little connection to main continuity, etc). Even their attempts to tie them into the bigger Batman events didn't work.
>tl;dr They did a much better job than Marvel on the CONTENT side of things, but like them they failed to meaningfully address the core problem of FORMAT.
I will say the relative failure of Batman and Superman probably couldn't have been predicted, I don't think anyone was ready for how the pathetic reaction to ANAD would have reached its peak right at that time so that people were so desperately clinging to the status quo that "earthshaking consequences!!!!" actually HURT the sales of a fucking Batman book. Couple that with the loss of Johns' GL and JL and you have a mainline that was absolutely not ready to support an experimental directive.
Carson Phillips
More than 50%.
Brandon Wood
Convergence and DCYou was a one two punch that many people didn't care for. You had an event nobody wanted and then changed everything up and people didn't come back for it. I don't think DCYou was bad but it didn't cater to the core demographic. And then Johns came in and fixed it all up. Then Didio did his usual thing and that's why he's not at DC anymore.
Justin Evans
objectively wrong
>cater to the core demographic an albatross at this point
>then Johns came in and fixed it all up Johns' Rebirth destroyed their trade sales. Rebirth was not the same trade seller as the New 52 AND it killed the sales of New 52 trades.
Nathan Diaz
>muh trades Trades didn't do DCYou any favors. There's more to it than just making money on comics that came out months ago. The priority is always selling floppies and Rebirth brought that back.
Asher Bailey
>The priority is always selling floppies And how is that working for the Big 2 compared to Dav Pilkey's Dog Man?
Samuel Ross
Scholastic and YA graphic novels beat out comics and manga and have done so for several years. It's the most successful comic print in the US. Why do you think DC has been doing their own YA books?
Juan James
Nah, he's right. Wednesday warriors are petty manchildren.
Luis Watson
>The priority is always selling floppies And that's wrong. It's why comics will always be shit.
Brody Morales
so you agree with me?
Dylan Ward
Brilliant rebuttal. Now try telling me what the #1 reason a comic is cancelled is.