A friendly reminder

It's more that they don't have the complete rights to it, so they won't bother doing anything more with it. It's similar to Sony and Disney/Marvel snubbing The Spectacular Spider-Man.

Mattel says FUCK NO.

Attached: ad1-15.png (381x643, 540.64K)

Um, no.

Attached: MOTU_HE-MAN_SOURCE_600dpi_edit20191217-6473-m97gtp.jpg (720x1080, 118.9K)

Wait, it will be 3DCGI?, a CGI cartoon from Netflix, so here comes the Berserk of Zig Forums

Mattel doesn't like it. Contrary to what lgbts and tumblr and Twitter says. It really wasn't a successful series despite getting 5 season's. Toys didn't sell at all and they didn't even bother advertising them

This is not the 1980s anymore. Kids nowadays don't have the same need for IRL toys when they have access to a plethora of video games.

Attached: kid tablet.jpg (800x532, 62.92K)

isn't the fact alone it have 5 season enough to say it's successfull?

Mattel should’ve made an immersive videogame. That would’ve sold over a bunch of dolls. The only people who buy dolls now are grown men trying to recapture their sad nostalgia.

Or speculators who flip them on eBay for inflated prices to exploit grown men trying to recapture their sad nostalgia.

According to Mattel, no it won't. The only people who actually liked Woke She-Ra are the woke crowd. It failed as a Children's cartoon and was a commercial/merchandising flop.

Get woke, go broke, as they say.

Mattel is a toy company, if it doesn’t move units then it’s worth less than shit.

>Grr I hate men so much!
LOL, this is what overcompensation looks like

1) "it's" lmao
2) source: your ass
3) She-Ra had little world building, and what was there was actually serviceable (but to know that, you need to actually watch the show and not just parrot Zig Forums talking points)
4) beats creating a soulless preachy spin-off just to sell toys (for shit-stirring tards who haven't watched it, this is referring to the original).

Five seasons with high views, at low cost. Cry more.

>was actually serviceable
If you have extremely low standards, yes.
>inb4 hurr u didn't watch muh garbage show
Fuck off, idiot.

It's sort of tsundere, isn't it.
>Ew, you boys are icky.. I..it's not like I want to be one of you or anything! Baka!

>Self contained stories bad, eternal milking good
You are the cancer of the american entertainment industry, the story ended just like planned, that don't mean it was a failure.

Ah ha ha, no. Mattel had no input on this show and the toys bombed horribly. This version is dead to them.

>If you have extremely low standards, yes.
Nah, it works. It's not Tolkien, but it works by in large. What sins it has are fairly common sins which often come with the territory dealing with specifics of logistics and not having enough time to show everything.

Attached: Silmarillion.jpg (330x500, 24.89K)

there were toys?

That is true but tv producers are still operating under the assumption that shows have to shill toys. (That's why Sym-bionic Titan and TRON Uprising were murdered)

That's observably untrue just from the Origins toyline.

Netflix isn't a toy company. If it doesn't make headway in viewership then it's worth less than shit.

Besides, Princesses of Power was never about making toys in the first place. The merch was just extra cash on the side, and most of it was convention exclusives. Hell, Netflix's Voltron barely sold much toys when it was still going and the grand total of that stuff was just poorly crafted shit that just sat on shelves. Had nothing to do with pushing the show forward at all.

People who say this shit don't interact with children. My nephew is up to his knees is Paw Patrol and Pokemon toys, even though he's often on some sorta app.

It's dull trash so it's not serviceable by definition unless you love to eat shit. Which you probably do since you like that shitty show.

In other words, Catradora is no longer a lesbian shipping because Noelle is trying to turn Adora into a straight white male

Attached: cheetah.jpg (640x427, 71.1K)