Why did they have the only good colonies?

All other colonies like spanish france or portugal are shitholes

Attached: 71HUxAHwmZL._AC_SL1500_.jpg (1500x1103, 112.37K)

Most of their african colonies were shitholes, and their current former one is becoming Mexico/Brazil. So many this topic again in 20 years.

Cope. USA abd other anglo colonies have good standard of life. But all other euro colonies suck.

> all other euro colonies suck
no
also
>yeah lets count canada and the us as anglo colonies

Yea we are anglo. Name any other good euro colonies btw.

Japan here
>Taiwan
>Korea
>northeast China
Not that bad

Why wouldn't Canada and the US be counted as Anglo? Their foundations are based on English cultural and legal institutions apart from one Canada province and in their early colonists were primarily English.

None of those are your colonies. You forcefully taking land doesn't make it a colony.

>Name any other good euro colonies
algeria,tunisia, rwanda,south africa, vietnam, costa rica, chile, argentina

>Their foundations are based on English cultural and legal institutions
>us constitution based on french philosophers

>apart from one Canada province and in their early colonists were primarily English.
>lets exclude half of the country and 200 yrs of settlement

>algeria,tunisia, rwanda,south africa, vietnam, costa rica, chile, argentina

Attached: 1587792788233.jpg (471x388, 94.25K)

>taiwan
a former dutch colony btw

>the only valid countries on the whole continent
>the countries burgers retire to

Being a slightly better shithole then the shithole region you reside in isn't an accomplishment. Us can aus nz are 100x better then any euro colony

>according to my arbitrary standards they suck
>Us can aus nz are 100x better then any euro colony
kek the delusion

>yeah lets count canada and the us as anglo colonies
COPIOUS amounts of cope

nice projection

This level of cope isnt healthy. Seriously it's an objective fact that brits suceeded at colonization(sometimes) euros failed EVERY time.

>Seriously it's an objective fact that brits suceeded at colonization(sometimes) euros failed EVERY time
because you say it doesnt make it a fact.
>euros failed EVERY time.
kek we failed so badly we kept half of them

>>yeah lets count canada and the us as anglo colonies
it would be very strange if you felt the need to go out of your way to not count them as "anglo colonies" when that is literally and unambiguously what they were

Becase we're the passers of civilisation

>when that is literally and unambiguously what they were
>half of the territory was french and spanish but yeah lets conveniently ignore that

Keeping ahold of your colonies is not a measurement of their quality of life and civillization.

migrants and burgerss flocking to them is tho

Stop coping. Loser boomers sexpats flying to SEA doesn't mean they're any good nations.

i wasnt talking about SEA
>n no those are only losers and boomers
>its shit because i said it
kek and im the one coping

It's sh8t because it is. Look at life expectancy, avg income, freedom of press, democracy index and any other metrics

Countries like Mexico or Argentina went to shit on their own, they had periods of extreme wealth (Argentina was the wealthiest nation of the world for a few years).

Probably has something to do with the fact that they undermined every other empire.
No shame in backstabbing your way to the top though, but no continental major power stooped to such levels.

>Look at life expectancy
highest on the continent, bretty gud with decent healthcare

>avg income
highest on the continent

> freedom of press
yeah free

>democracy index
yeah i mean oversea territories are part of the mainland so they have the same

even ex colonies arent doing so bad.

you can just cherrypick both ways
>muh look at sudan, bangladesh and malawi
>wow dem ebil brits are stoopid lol
i dont really see the point of muh best colonizers since in the end the only mistake we all made was to decolonize to various extents

this

Argentina fucked itself because the worst spanish and italians tried to benefit from it

No they don't. Most americans live pay check to pay check despite their cunt being rich

Your country is literally led by a French with malay ancestry lol

This is what I mean by cope. You're saying highest in the region and Anglo are saying highest amongst the world

>rwanda
After France let genocide after genocide happen and the Tutsis kicked out the Hutu-French collaborators.

They genocided the natives and replaced them with Anglo BVLLS

Literally because of genocide and infinitely lower slave populations. Everybody blows their load yelling at the US for slavery while in reality they only imported like 10% of the total slave population. Almost all went to
>South America - namely Brazil
>Caribbean

Honestly wish we could have an actual discussion about this without it just immediately descending into Euros screeching and denying reality.

Yeah european autism is unmatched I can see why you guys left the EU now.

...

Yep and even then better then Brazil, Mexico etc and all other euro colonies

What's the best colony ever in terms of economic return?
I can think of these 3
>India
>Indonesia
>New England

Attached: download.jpg (217x233, 7.03K)