If they united they'd be unstoppable

if they united they'd be unstoppable

Attached: central-america-map.png (1700x1080, 44.89K)

Apart from by that neighbour to the north who would definetely not like to see this happen.
I can see open US intervention in Mexico and Central America in the next decade.

México is almost as big as europe, has tons of fertile lands and also petroleum, yet it is underdeveloped, being bigger wouldn't change a thing about it

illiterate bong

Attached: mapa_gran_colombia.jpg (550x524, 35.51K)

YIIIIIIIKEEEES

why would the americans disagree?
isn't in their interest for central america to be stable and safe?

Attached: 55ba87b8dd0895c81c8b4581-750-686.png (750x686, 351.1K)

if they had someone smart who wasn't retarded PIS or a fucking communist they'd prosper.
If Nayib Bukele was President of OP pic the new country would be Eastern European tier within a decade.

>Getting skilled workers from across south America to help delvop their agriculture on fertile land wont do shit
Don't be stupid user
They can't have a control the government and take oil and resoruces with no resisistance if south america is doing fine and not wasting its time against american funded drug dealers

panama isn't yours anymore
it's time to let go

you believe the US perpetuates the war on drugs simply to fuck over brown countries and keep them subservient to Los Estados Unidos?

Attached: 13.png (329x272, 179K)

That'll be scotland, wales, gibraltar and the falklands destiny for you

Americans don't even like the idea of China becoming more successful than them, they would be totally against any latinamerican country becoming not only developed but totally independent from them or europe (self sustainable).

It is simple, every single empire in history disappeared because its neighbor8ng nations developed more than them, so the USA makes sure that their neighbors stay shittier than them always

>isn't in their interest for central america to be stable and safe?
LMAO no. Our gov wants everyone weak and following what we say. They don't want prosperity for other other countries. They want them feeding us resources for cheap and keeping themselves poor.

Just get rid of Costa Rica.

>Think
user its all but confirmed at this point
America does not want friends, if you have somthing they want they will take it from you.

The best way to do this is to cripple you with regime change wars and funding drug dealers

We can’t even govern ourselves as separated countries what makes you think we would proposer as one big ass country where a sense of true unity doesn’t really exist, because yes, we have a lot of cultural similarities it we also have a lot of cultural differences, too.

Attached: image.jpg (400x267, 97.32K)

Centralamérica has even more fértil lands than México since our soil is volcanic yet we do nothing with it, more than that we are making it infertile by hatvesting a lot of very destructive crops like sugar cane and african palm

>why would the americans disagree?
>isn't in their interest for central america to be stable and safe?

Attached: 1577973859896.gif (800x430, 897.09K)

Guess why you are stuck farming shit plants?
Manufacturers in America need cheap crops from somewhere.

If any of those farmers decided "meh I want to change up my crops" they would end up with a cartel bullet in their head no jokes or they will just force you to farm sugar crops.

Did you niggas forget the banna republic days so soon??
AMERICA IS NOT YOUR FRIEND

Attached: file.png (1200x632, 28.46K)

We can make both things happen.
Panama of course is righteous Gran Colombian clay

The war on drugs is a way for the US to enforce counter insurgency operations and direct our defense policy.

Deal

Bananas unironically are better than the shit we cultivate now, no cartel would kill them for not planting shit plants, they do it because sugar cane are easy to harvest and are paid moderately well, while corn beans, cacao,bananas, and rice require effort, they are a bunch of lazy retarded slaves

but then the border wouldn't be sexy

Our elite also promotes and financiates these shit practices, rivers are getting drained and the life of the people is getting more expensive because of that, which only means more money to our élites

We already shook hands on it.

Respecting historical boundaries is more important than your OCD m8, and I'm being generous with the Mexican lad because Costa Ricans descend from Chibchan language family Chads just like Panamanians and Colombians, but CR was historically part of the Mexican Empire, so I accept that they keep them

Attached: flut.jpg (1440x1368, 219.43K)

Ecuador is rightful peruvian clay

You have learned nothing...

Ask an ecuadorian who they'd rather be a part of if they had no choice and then come back to me, mein fren

Attached: jkñ.png (362x347, 163.01K)

Small countries with great political instability and corruption, Mexico the largest narco-state that exists. The union would be a Yugoslavia with drug trafficking.

Panama and Costa Rica are the only functional countries out of that bunch. The rest appear to be some overdeveloped indian town full of gangs and crooks.
Why would Mexico take 4 violent shitholier Oaxacas for 2 countries with an actual upside? It's idiotic.
A Confederation would serve everyone better and would solve 80% of our internal struggles (all derived from the centralization of our institutions).

The indios would say Perú, as their culture and heritage is inca and not from some braindead caribbean

any country to the south frontline of USA no matter how big or small is destined to became a narco-state.