France destroyed the most prosperous and stable african country

France destroyed the most prosperous and stable african country

Attached: download (1).jpg (183x275, 10.49K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/yTtj8WeNKY0
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

I will never forgive France for this.

Rest easy Colonel, you will not be forgotten.

Yes, western countries actually believe war is peace.

Wow I didn't know we were so based

Not France but Sarkozy with the help of the DGSE to hide secret funds

I can only imagine who would benefit from destroying African countries so that Africans would move to Europe

Attached: 1505347148485.png (238x220, 36.5K)

lol france what a bunch of losers trying to be something again

We fuck and enlarge the hole of your country anytime, bro

Isn't France trying to fix it now by backing based Haftar?

buddy your country only exists because Charles De Gaulle allowed it to

I don’t know, it certainly changed with Macron’Policy

both of you cunts get blacked

Attached: 5bb1d4add5a12.jpg (756x499, 54.57K)

>Fixing war with more war

Gadafi was the only thing between you and Ngubu´s dick

too late to turn back on that now, the only thing left to do is to sponsor a secular faction who can rebuild the country, and for now that guy is Haftar. The "government of national accord" is essentially a Muslim Brotherhood branch that would be a launching base for the Islamist movement to further destabilize both MENA and Europe.

What happened to Tunisia?
t. obssesed
Back to Zig Forums. Try to avoid the next Russian bombing.

When I was in high school the textbooks made him out to be a heartless dictator who made his country into shit. Then I watched some documentary on YouTube and he turned out to be some dude who wanted to help all of Africa. Which one is lying to me?

They're both true, you can't boil politics down to good/bad like you're watching sports or something.

>The "government of national accord" is essentially a Muslim Brotherhood

Wasn't the point of murdering the evil bad dictator to let people choose their destiny?

Also, lol at "sponsor" and "rebuild". If the west sponsor you, that means you serve the interests of the west, not the interests of your people.

>France destroyed the most prosperous and stable african country
It was unironically first world/better than eastern Europe and would have been extremely prosperous if Lybia didn't get MERICA'D and FRENCH'D.

Attached: libya-human-development-index-hdi-wb-data-.png (400x250, 8.32K)

Lybia had the biggest HDI in Africa

it was definitely never stable, friend. it was always a hair's breath away from exploding. if it were stable, they would have picked themselves up by now.
>t. been there
my unckle used to take me to business trips there in sunmertime. and it was always a clown show.

he was right after all

Attached: ...jpg (800x376, 48.45K)

The good thing is that America is seen as the evil here despite that they did nothing (except help the french with bombing because they were afraid that the french did not succeed) and now common people thinks that the end of Gadhafi is from Americans

Attached: B4188F48-A215-4435-808F-7E6C951416E6.jpg (921x800, 165.47K)

>Wasn't the point of murdering the evil bad dictator to let people choose their destiny?
Yes but no one really cares.
>Also, lol at "sponsor" and "rebuild". If the west sponsor you, that means you serve the interests of the west, not the interests of your people.
True, but if you are an enemy of the west, and a true enemy (not china) you would get destroyed in a matter of seconds.

Attached: EWiBGnxXkAAIk6G.jpg (2000x2000, 883.62K)

fuck fr*Nce

Attached: 1585370721625.jpg (448x336, 75.26K)

How fitting that he died by getting a knife shoved up his ass by a bunch of islamists

Based
btw he said that in front of a crowd of African Muslims, so they're not only getting Islamised but also BLACKED

>When I was in high school the textbooks made him out to be a heartless dictator who made his country into shit. Then I watched some documentary on YouTube and he turned out to be some dude who wanted to help all of Africa. Which one is lying to me?
Both true, exept he made his country pretty gud and modern but clamped down on all freedoms. However this in all honesty looking back was necessary as with the freedom the people have now, they are just killing eachother, just like south Sudan.
His country was the most developed out of all of Africa (better than most of eastern Europe) and have been 1st world in 2020
He wanted to help all of Africa and make it into an actual player on the world stage and wanted the whole of Africa no move away from the petrodollar and use a gold form of currency.
He was pretty crazy and incompetent however and his actions like getting beaten by a bunch of chadian rebels on fucking Toyota's shows that he wasn't the best leader.

Also Africa for the most part is developing (this picture was in 2010, the situation in africa is much better now)

Attached: UN_Human_Development_Report_2010_1.png (1350x652, 57.43K)

That guy wasn't the leader of Morocco or South Africa

de Gaulle was a pussy

>However this in all honesty looking back was necessary as with the freedom the people have now, they are just killing eachother
that's because he never bothered to elevate them, duh. he never really improved on the education sector.

This is the hdi of Africa and the world now (2018 but still)

Attached: 920px-Countries_by_Human_Development_Index_(2019).png (920x415, 129.29K)

>that's because he never bothered to elevate them, duh. he never really improved on the education sector.
True
Do you think Lybia will get better anyway?
I honestly don't know if it will considering they are still fighting right now.
youtu.be/yTtj8WeNKY0

Attached: maxresdefault (11).jpg (1280x720, 120.62K)

Germanic language=High HDI?