m.youtube.com
i dont even have words for the stupidity for muttlings..
m.youtube.com
i dont even have words for the stupidity for muttlings..
Other urls found in this thread:
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
cardiovascularbusiness.com
forbes.com
twitter.com
it genuinely works though
Send proof
>right now
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
some dutch doctor tried it on his patients too and claimed it works
i dont have much proof but theres no proof against it either. I think CNN published some article but they only used Chloroquine, insteads of Hydroxychloroquine and Azithromyicin
Hydroxichloroquine is known far a long time to have heart related collateral effects. And it's what's happening.
for a long*
he's taking it as a prophylactic though, there is no evidence it prevents covid19. that's insane, whoever prescribed that to him is retarded.
I don't believe he's taking it unless he actually does it on camera. No healthy individual should be taking it
DAHNALD BLUMPF
seems pretty based to me
Nobody prescribed it to him. He asked his physician to prescribe it to him.
Treatable if there’s a doctor or nurse near you. It’s not like taking speed or meth for 20 years
I can only hope for the love of god that liberals are seething on twitter so that he keeps taking it out of spite and inevitably hospitalizes himself.
So somebody did prescribe it to him
>Trump dies of a heart attack from taking fish tank pills to prevent a flu he doesn't even have
How will the world react?
Looks like someone who has shares in the company who makes hydroxychloroquine. What company is it?
I’ve got a question. Am I the only one who start to think that Science is the 21st century religion ? With the different dogma and no one can tell what’s true or not ?
I mean. Isn’t science supposed to give us true and verified answers
>tp
>tf
Personally I would laugh for a week straight.
Yeah but some companies can buy up researchers to cover some things which would work positively for them. That happens often for agriculture companies, just huge mafia about it.
>i don't want to be tested, but they test me
lmao
Like Monsanto and shit ?
And also I meant for the people and «mediatic scientists». Like those on twitter or in TV. If a shit work or don’t work there’s results. Why do they interpret them like it’s a law ? They’re no lawyers they’re fucking scientists. Read that paper and judge it on the process and results not on what you think is good
And then he tries to self-medicate with injection of bleach to stop the side effects of the hydroxichloroquine
No, but SCIENCE is, you can't argue with SCIENCE, even though billion dollar companies have interests in altering the accepted truth to their advantage, simply don't argue with it because of you don't have the backing off a large institution you're wrong
Ok doctor
see but with no less than 500 threads made on Zig Forums in that same week
Because you can prove science for yourself if you care to do so and confirm the results.
You can’t confirm or peer review religion
Wait SCIENCE is why redditors love Bill Nye and Elon so much right ? Or SCIENCE is the art of proving thing and discovering truths ?
SCIENCE is whatever has an entry in Wikipedia
it wouThe problem is actual scientists don't have explicit answers for everything, particularly in medicine where there is a great deal of individual variability. Despite this, journalists want to communicate things as 'definite' and 'universal's, while physicians and pharma/biotech companies want things that they can a) follow in step by step instructions b) are generally true at the population level.
This is true as well. Though retards often use this as a means to think anything new in medicine is jewish trickery.
t. scientist whose work sometimes has medical implications (I'm at a very preclinical level though)
Another issue that's clear from both your posts and my general interaction with people irl, is that these days science is more associated with people who've given themselves a 'science communicator' label and people who apply it (physicians/engineers) as opposed to active researchers
>confirm or peer review religion
Isn’t that why there’s 3 monotheist religions
Was this all part of Greta’s master plan?
>I mean. Isn’t science supposed to give us true and verified answers
science gives you uncertainty, treating it like it's truth and verified is what leads to cargo cult science and the religion aspect you're talking about
Even gender shit ?
How long before Pence is sworn in?
You're welcome.
ESPECIALLY gender shit you Nazi
So if science gives you uncertainty and should makes you question things , rednecks who don’t believe in vaccine are somehow kinda right ?
I’m taking a retarded example to make things clear btw