Untitled

Oh nice opinion mate. I have a different opinion. Cool huh?

good

Ebay

youre the same person that posts the british housing and streets threads and portugese favelas threads arent you?

what?

hmm looked like the same autist making the same threads with the same titles everytime...

oh okay

What is the street?

what street?

"Rejects the street"

BASED BASED BASED don't listen to the seething coping mudhutians.

>Europeans pretending that their meaningless mud huts have some sort of significance is the cringiest thing ever. Admit it; you're just afraid of heights, so you're too much of a pussy to have skyscrapers like America.
>Like: Am I the only one that doesn't find Europe good-looking? If I wanted to see a bum on the porch of a 'WOWOWOWOW HISTORIKAL BUILDANG' I'd move to the old part of town. Move out of the stone age, Europe. I prefer USA skyscrapers over disgusting mud-huts.

>The USA will keep building enormous and magnificent towers symbolizing their dominance while Euros will forever dwell in cave

Attached: urgay.jpg (866x1390, 139.01K)

Highly based.

>I prefer skyscrapers

Absolute absence of SOVL

Muricans pay a lot of cash to see our caves

i dont know i did not make that street

Eurocucks seething at this post

Yeah, there's a difference between streets and roads. Most modern cities, especially in North America barely have streets in them. Just a hybrid between the two, where you have both fast moving traffic and high-intensity usage (shops and busineses or houses). That leads to very unproductive usage, yet very expensive infrastructure. It's one of the many systematic reasons American cities are going broke.

The American pattern of development is fantastically unproductive. The infrastructure is too expensive for the purpose it serves. When infrastructure is so expensive to build and maintain, yet has a very small tax base to fund it, you get Detroit. You notice this in most American cities. Once suburbs reach a certain age, they start to crumble. Just look at any second or third ring suburbs around mayor US cities, like St. Louis or Atlanta, or whichever city it might be.

Where did you find this picture of me

SKYSCRAPERS

Attached: In-Town-in-Phoenix-Arizona.jpg (2048x1365, 747.8K)

>Muh OLD=GOOD, NEW=BAD
Brainlet take tbqh

Attached: 1591463803575.gif (236x420, 70.86K)

Phoenix is BASED

i dont say that... but old city centers are usually nicer to be in

And a complete financial disaster. None of those roads, bridges, pipes, pumps, valves are meters will be maintained 30 or 40 years down the road. There are tens of billions of dollars of infrastructure in that picture, most of it built on borrowed money. Where is all the money to maintain that stuff going to come from in the future? They're barely able to maintain what they've got in the ground right now, yet they're building more stuff every year, and borrowing the money to do it. These cities will all become Detroit. Detroit is no outlier, they were just early, as a motor city with this style of development.