What's the second-biggest urban area in your country? What do people think of it?
>US
>Los Angeles (16 million people in the urban region)
>Nasty, over-priced shithole
What's the second-biggest urban area in your country? What do people think of it?
>US
>Los Angeles (16 million people in the urban region)
>Nasty, over-priced shithole
We should expell most of the population to the midwest rural areas
LA is a fantastic city. Only incel zit popping dweebs hate it. West is best, suck my wewe
>LA is a fantastic city
It has literal typhoid outbreaks due to poor sanitation.
Barcelona, 5,6M urban area. 2M are moors
Give it back, Cletus
Sure, in Skid Row. Why would you have any reason to go over there?
I could see why someone might move to San Francisco or San Diego. I legitimately can’t understand why anyone would move to Los Angeles. It might be a bigger scam than New York City.
this
>El Pueblo de Nuestra Señora la Reina de los Ángeles de Porciúncula
Yeah, give it back
What's so funny?
this shithole, people dont like it because its full of leftists and homos
Los Angeles is automatically a bad city because it has no reason to exist. It is in the middle nowhere in the desert, imports all of its water, and is entirely fake. This is why it makes sense for all of its residents to be just as superficial.
>Here's your house, bro! It's in the ghetto and you'll probably get robbed every few months. That will be $1.1 million, please.
LA is comfy if you don't have to commute far, I'd live there if I could still afford it.
>people dont like it because...
Is this why everyone wants to live there?
Every big city, no matter how shit, can be like "heh thats why everyone want to live here hmmmmm???"
no they go to live there because theres more jobbies
i had to live there for work for 2 years and it was pure agony i wanted to kill myself daily. some of the suburbs are comfy but i still prefer the north
>San Francisco
Anyone who wants to actually move to SF is mentally ill. It is a husk of the city it used to be. Only the ultra-uber rich can afford to live a comfortable adult life there. Also the homeless problem is more visual there due to less space in the city.
Sure it is an expensive city, how could buying property in the second largest city (also has perfect climate for humans) in the most developed country on earth not be? It is not nearly as expensive to buy as SF or NYC.
Thats las vegas or pheonix. LA is not in a desert.
No, In our case everyone also want to hang out there.
We got only 2 real cities and the rest is periphery and boring af (which is okay if this is the kind of lifestyle that you want, but not for anything else)
You probably just lived in a disgusting southern neighborhood. Anyway you would dislike any big city worldwide as well, probably.
Hamburg is both the second biggest city (after Berlin) and second biggest metropolitan area (after Rhine-Ruhr) I think
מה אתה עושה פה בשעה כזאת אנון? אתה ב/ישר/ ?
וכן אני כנראה שונא עיר גדולה למרות שבחיפה היה לי די סבבה. אני מעדיף עיר קטנה אבל
>Anyone who wants to actually move to SF is mentally ill. It is a husk of the city it used to be. Only the ultra-uber rich can afford to live a comfortable adult life there. Also the homeless problem is more visual there due to less space in the city.
Sure, but you could see why someone would move there for economic reasons at the very least. I see no reason to live in LA at all.
כן אני שם כמו כל ישראלי טוב
אני לא יודע מה אני עושה פה בשעה כזו בעצמי
והנקודה היא שנכון שתל אביב לפעמים מכוערת ויקרה אבל היא לא עיר גרועה לדעתי
אגב הוא אמר איזור אורבני ולא עיר אז בכלל אנחנו אמורים לדבר על ירושלים כי היא המטרופולין השני הכי גדול אחרי מטרופולין גוש דן
Yes it is, you stupid faggot.
What would the economic reasons for moving to SF be? Are you talking about tech jobs?
LA has plenty of industry and jobs, not to mention the entertainment capital of the world.
>Sunshine & non-native cacti in people yards = desert
Bro, you are dumb as fuck
melbourne
all the funny sounding people come from there
>New California Republic
>Dayglow
>they recognize our superiority of course, we're LA without all the shitty parts
it's the other way around. The reason Silicon Valley wasn't built in Bumfuck, West Virginia, is because talented workers didn't want to move to Bumfuck, West Virginia, they want to move to the Bay Area.
Alexandria
>What do people think of it
They're ok, it's still not Cairo or Giza so frankly it doesn't matter.
Well, I just mean for a normal person I could see how someone would work in tech or a related field and actually want to move to SF for that reason. I guess you could say the same for entertainment in LA but I don’t really think that’s an industry the average person is working in and if they are, places like New York would be equally viable. That’s all I’m saying.
Maybe at first but it gets to a point where people move there because of economies of agglomeration.
Los Angeles isn't even really a city it's just a massive urban sprawl zone. It has some great areas and some shit areas.
It is not a desert but it does have to import all its water so it might as well be a desert.
Egypt bros rise up
The West Coast is nice but your cities honestly suck ass. Also, I get the California weather is nice year round but some of us like seasons. It would’ve been great if you had a non shit city somewhere on the Oregon coast or somewhere you could still get snow or something.