The virgin PEMDAS vs the Chad GEMA

9

9

9
retards say otherwise

It's 1, case closed.

Attached: 6212 solved.png (1308x850, 31.78K)

brainlets
chads
based

21

9

I chuckled

Sum lacks the required notation in any of the listed systems that would prevent confusion (additional brackets etc), and is thus invalid. If something lacks context, you can't provide a 100 percent accurate answer, which math requires until you get to higher level probability, statistics and various permutations of applied fields.

Shut up nerd

9
wolframalpha.com/input/?i=6/2*(1+2)

9

Computer arithmetics read the equation directly from left to right like a brainlet.

so the most advanced computers are wrong and some brainlet posting on Zig Forums is correct?

fuck outta here

>some brainlet posting on Zig Forums is correct?
This is true, see

This is the correct notation
wolframalpha.com/input/?i=6/(2*(1+2))

Nothing left to do but kill yourselves

Based.

Normal human being (not amerimutt) would write it in a sensible way to avoid confusion. Look at this, anyone can understand it without any bullshit acromyms.

Attached: human_maths.jpg (950x335, 27.06K)

Antagonism is the last resort for the defeated, it's clear that those who say it's 9 are being the most antagonistic, therefore it is obvious that they are in the wrong and they can't do anything but cope.

I don't see two sets of parentheses in the OP

Using x/y is the same as using
x
-
y,
which is the same as x/(y).

Well yeah unless you're a Mohammedan you usually read things left to right

This is how to spot people who dont actually do maths.
If you are writing any kind of derivation having the 2 next to the bracket like that implies it's part of the denominator.
Commonly written maths always needs extra brackets to input to excel or wolfram.

>you usually read things left to right
Not for maths equations though, BODMAS applies.

anyone who had math until third grade can understand the equation posted by OP perfectly fine

If the person writing wanted there to be parentheses he would have put them there. If they're not there just assume that it's not there.

I don't know what the fuck a bumdas is. I didn't grow up in a country where they give you a retarded acronym to make you remember that you need to multiply before you add

Attached: 1581603438580.png (601x508, 126.8K)

>If they're not there just assume that it's not there.
If the person writing the equation did not want an eternal flamewar they would've written ÷ as /.

It's 1 retards

It's the same thing though. Nobody even writes the weird symbol unless you're in fucking elementary or middle school where I'm from

If it is the same thing, then surely you must agree that the answer is 1, as proven by

That's the most retarded thing I have ever seen. There is no indication that the (1+2) should move down