How would neanderthal's be treated if they were alive today?

>qt neanderthal
they looked like this

Attached: main-qimg-6d3ba0cb5f5725869439c7609f45b238.jpg (602x794, 496.2K)

If Neanderthals were so smart why are they all dead?

The real reason they died out is that chad SAPIENS took the neandergirls and made the neandermales into autistic incels

İ think they would be the ones ruling over us.

Perfection.

Because they were too good for this sinful world

Environmental changes, they hunted more dangerous game in more dangerous ways, and they were outcompeted by us because they only formed small groups whereas we formed very large groups that could work together.

>males in my family are short, wide, hairy, more often than not with redish beard and slightly more brown hair and are often depressed

Attached: 1592878343930.jpg (680x472, 31.54K)

Neanderthals showed the newly arrived niggers from Europe hospitality, but the blacks backstabbed and raped them.

They were surprised by invading niggers who stabbed them at night when neanderthals were sleeping.

>UGH UGH...HOM

Attached: altai.jpg (610x388, 70.54K)

maybe the neanderthal we're looking for is inside all of us all along

They'd be sitting in the Russian parliament

Attached: Valuev.jpg (500x704, 71.92K)

Attached: 1571082042359.jpg (700x440, 47.18K)

tfw homo sapien sapiens literally BLACKED neanderthals out of existence

proud of my species for once

Sure one Neanderthal sex slave coming right up

Attached: images (9).jpg (366x328, 11.13K)

many theories, but the latest most dominant one was the gene that decides talkativeness.
There was one segment of the DNA discovered that was common among all vertebrates including Homo Neanderthalensis, but not Homo Sapiens. Scientists found that the segment with mutation that was seen in Homo Sapiens worked so with the rat experiments.

It was often known from the excavation sites that Neanderthals had long been dueling in caves only in terms of small families without having their tools developed, while Homo Sapiens had been living as larger extent of settlements as time went by in a unit of genetically unrelated families and technologies shared and developed among them.

abos are 0% neanderthal

the chad homo sapiens vs the virgin neanderthals

Would look the same doe is my point seppo

so that somewhat ties in with the modern understanding that homo sapiens got to where we are today because of their sociability, e.g. teamwork and organisation. what about spergs? are spergs and autismos the closest thing to neanderthals nowadays?

neanderthals are attractive

Non-meme answer:
The ways they hunted were more sustainable, and their groups were much smaller. Homo Sapiens generally speaking bred as much as they could and hunted as much as they could.

To expand on the differences, the Neanderthals were much tankier and robust than Sapiens, they would generally hunt large game by charging at them with spears and gutting them open over and over, sponging whatever hits the animal would land on them or outright dodging them, you can see this through the grizzly wounds on Neanderthal fossils that had healed over the years whereas on Sapiens it would likely have resulted in immediate death as well as the much stronger and thicker bone structure of Neanderthals. Their groups were much, much smaller and closely knit than the Sapiens tribes however. In Neanderthal Eurasia megafauna rarely went extinct from overhunting. Homo Sapiens on the other hand, preferred to set up traps and threw their spears from a distance. They were nowhere near as strong or resilient as the Neanderthals, direct confrontation with large beasts would lead to mortal wounds more often than not. But their groups were much, much larger. They essentially bred as much as they could and hunted as much as they could. Wherever Homo Sapiens went, mass extinction of megafauna soon followed.

Intellectually, the Neanderthals and Sapiens seemed to be about equals. Both species engaged in art, toolmaking, language, hunting strategies. The Neanderthal had a slightly larger brain but that doesn’t necessarily mean higher intelligence, it could very easily have been grey matter dedicated to muscle control rather than intellectual development. The only category where Homo Sapiens really and very clearly succeeded in besting the Neanderthals was in outbreeding them.

Isn't it also true that sapiens likely had superior abilities to cooperate in large groups, this making their increased numbers actually valuable?

If you say so

Attached: 1594455270801.gif (480x360, 2.44M)

I hate australians

Attached: 1593617146036.png (1106x1012, 727.56K)

But how much homo erectus are they?

Possibly. I’m sceptical of any claim of that, though. Neanderthals were strong but they weren’t THAT strong. They couldn’t just charge mammoths and wooly rhinos and expect to win through sheer brute force alone, they would have needed to track their prey, coordinate their movements and attack in tandem for their hunting strategy to work effectively. Sapiens were definitely more sociable and lived in larger groups but I don’t buy the idea that working as a group was something they had access to that the Neanderthals didn’t. Sheer numbers is a much simpler and more likely answer.

>tfw the bad guys won

Attached: 93412121_3715489285135126_3463304195468165120_n.jpg (720x960, 59.7K)

I think he covered it in the "bred as much as they could and hunted in large numbers" part. But yeah, it's still applies today that quantity is very often a quality

Some people say autism of Homo Sapiens has been partially inherited from Neanderthals.