Which European cunt has the best military and why is it us

Which European cunt has the best military and why is it us

Attached: Royal_Marines_in_Sangin_MOD_45151554.jpg (3000x2000, 1.42M)

its actually Spain, sorry man

Attached: spanish legionary.jpg (833x1218, 705.07K)

because you want to go on jolly adventures with daddy america

SAS

Attached: army3a.jpg (2500x1842, 1021.56K)

How sad

Would be crushed by the mighty Luxembourg Navy

France, I'm 90% sure

Yeah. France.

It's not though is it

France. Germany's is unironically weaker than Finland's, but some of my German friends insist they could build a strong one up very quickly if the need came, can someone confirm if that's true or just a cope?

we

WUZ

(VI)KANGZ N SHIT

Attached: 401px-Ed_21102008_140.jpg (401x375, 61.79K)

France

Just a cope. It's the same as me saying my country could win a war against Russia single handedly with GDP spending as in spite of their sheer power their GDP is

I’ve heard is totally incompetent with the exception of some spec ops teams

Based, wish Sweden could not be cucks and join NATO too

>France. Germany's is unironically weaker than Finland's
lol, just because you spend a few months in the woods makes you this delusional?

yeah I imagine they have very heavy restrictions due to certain obvious historical reasons
seething

I'm afraid it's the other way round my friend. Japan is a defence force yet they have much better military technology and a much better budget.

The UK will remain superior to Germany in this regard

all these people saying France are retarded; they literally can't operate out of their home territory and if they do it's just some useless patrolling around Côte d'Ivoire or some shit

with the implosion of the soviet union there is no real reason to have a large standing army at the moment

still we spend 50 billion each year, around 16 times as much as Finland and as much as France and the UK

Attached: file.png (497x439, 30.89K)

>yeah I imagine they have very heavy restrictions due to certain obvious historical reasons
I don’t know if it’s restrictions so much as total neglect and mismanagement but I really wouldn’t know. All others I’ve heard of aren’t exactly negative but the only ones I’ve ever heard really positive things about are Brits, Aus, FFL, and Polish spec ops. Friends and family were Ranger and SF.

Finland unironically has more artillery than Germany, and more operational aircraft and tanks.

what are you talking about? He said Finland is stronger than Germany

In terms of technology many top notch products are still made in Germany, like the HK416 France recently adopted as their main battle rifle

Is that why we weren't in Vietnam?

They are more active militarily in the world than any other country after us

Hard to believe Japan spends that much

Attached: hmm.jpg (735x600, 64.04K)

And UK can without big daddy America doing the lifting? I guess you have an aircraft carrier now, is it operational yet?

I never said German engineering is bad (we are big big fans of it). Just that throughout history your military influence has failed to surpass ours

Poland

Attached: 1585087374933.jpg (1277x832, 236.76K)

Most developed countries are lucky to even have an aircraft carrier lmao. I doubt your country even has one

>military influence
ah that's why the SA80 had to be redesigned by HK engineers and the Challenger tanks get Rheinmetall guns now?

>I doubt your country even has one
Of course not. Why the fuck would Finland need an aircraft carrier? It's not like we need to send our aircraft to Atlantic to stop the Russian invasion.

Nope you're wrong. Pic related is the degree of active personnel globally. Even then China and India also can't operate out of home territory, and the best Russia can do is try annexing Ukraine

Attached: 4547657575756.png (1920x901, 233.29K)

You're still talking about engineering, plus we bought the rights to HK for that

I’m not talking active military personnel. I mean military personnel who are conducting operations abroad

Ah ok I misunderstood

You say that sarcastically but you're yet to order one

Can France top this? And if it can is it mostly going to be in Africa?

They say France because France has a tendency to start international incidents and then just petition the US into doing everything for them while they reap all the rewards and taking the credit alongside the US as a "Key ally" whenever there is a successful operation or just melting away from any blame concerning the situation by ceasing all operations upon US intervention
See: Vietnam, Libya, Chad, Burkina Faso, Mali, Niger, Mauritania

The rest of NATO does this as well, the UK especially, but nowhere near the same scale as the French do, especially recently

Us if we don't include russia

fuck forgot pic related

Attached: Map_of_United_Kingdom_overseas_military_bases.png (1419x720, 195.94K)

>Can france top this ?
Yes we can Nigel and also our soldiers are actually fighting not just standing around enjoying german brothels

Attached: Af_Ner_116_Fort_de_Madama.jpg (801x533, 87.12K)

>The rest of NATO does this as well
Only France and UK do that. Rest of NATO doesn't care to start foreign adventures.

They have military personnel all over Africa, the Middle East, the Caribbean and pacific and Indian oceans

it's obviously France

The rest of NATO might as well not even exist

Attached: 1589420775491.jpg (517x404, 121.92K)