The truth about Pakistani history

Pakistanis all across the internet love to claim how they are whiter than Indians, Bengalis, Sri Lankan’s and Nepalis. Their whiteness is a result of their women being cocksleeves for invaders. They take extreme pride in this fact.

When Alexander invaded the region known as Pakistan, the people there were described in the Greek accounts as dark skinned. Much like Indians. However what followed was rape and miscegenation done by Greeks onto Pakistani women. The Greeks were extremely violent and the Pakistani King Porus who had become a vassal of Alexander was assassinated by his Greek general.

To save the Pakistanis from this brutal repression by the Greeks, came the Indians. The Mauryan Empire invaded the Greek controlled areas, and defeated the Greeks in 303 BCE. Peace and prosperity ushered in Pakistan.

From 303 BCE to 185 BCE, the Mauryan Empire ruled in its glory. Ashoka, the King of the Mauryans, converted to Buddhism and spread Buddhism not only in India but also in Pakistan. The Pakistanis readily converted to the religion of their masters (Indians).

Attached: 9A0C4611-A5E9-4A83-AE98-7F6D0AD4B289.jpg (2560x2768, 388.25K)

Other urls found in this thread:

desuarchive.org/int/thread/96528738/#96528738
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Keep in mind, Buddha was no Scythian as claimed by Pakistanis. He was from a tribe called the Sakhya, and lived in the 5th century BCE while Scythians came to India in 2nd century BCE and even then did not go past North Western India. The Shakya tribe has been described as non-Aryan in the Aryan texts. These were not Scythians but likely indigenous tribes to India. Their customs sound nothing like Scythians.

“The laws of Manu treats them as being non Aryan. As noted by Levman, "The Baudhāyana-dharmaśāstra (1.1.2.13–4) lists all the tribes of Magadha as being outside the pale of the Āryāvarta; and just visiting them required a purificatory sacrifice as expiation" (In Manu 10.11, 22).[13] This is confirmed by the Ambaṭṭha Sutta, where the Sakyans are said to be "rough-spoken", "of menial origin" and criticised because "they do not honour, respect, esteem, revere or pay homage to Brahmans."[16] Some of the non-Vedic practices of this tribe included incest (marrying their sisters), the worship of trees, tree spirits and nāgas.[17]”

When the Mauryan Empire collapsed in 185 BCE (a very interesting event, the Emperor was assassinated), Northern India was under the rule of the Shunga Empire, and Southern India was ruled by Dravidian Kings and fiefdoms.

What about Pakistan? Literally ruled by a Greek Kingdom. The Greeks commanded Pakistan, while the Indians commanded India.

There is one thing that you will observe throughout history, and it really irks anyone with a sense of history, that the entire region known as Pakistan has never produced an Empire, or an independent state in all of history. Not one. Pakistanis were always ruled by Indians or foreigners.

Now what happened after the Greeks fell? Pakistan was once again conquered by Kushans, a Nordic European tribe from Central Asia conquered Pakistan. The Kushans did make incursions in Northern India, but was unable to reach Pataliputra.

So who conquered the Kushans? Was it the Pakistanis who rebelled against their masters? No! It was the Indians, again. Samudragupta’s conquests began in 335 CE, and he conquered the Kushans and established the Gupta Empire.

Many Pakistanis on the internet will claim that the Gupta Empire were “Kushan descendents” as a way to discredit Indians, unable to cope with the fact that a bunch of Nordic savages took over their country from Greeks and ruled them. But no serious historian believes that, the earliest Gupta inscriptions come from Bengal. And, the sheer fact that the Guptas conquered the Kushans and defeated them in battle. Why would they declare war against their own kin and start a new empire?

And finally, the Huns. The White Huns invaded “India” (although just Pakistan and North Western India) in 470-536 CE. After the Gupta military posts retreated back to India, the White Huns raped Pakistani women. Pakistani women were taken out by Hunnic conquerors and raped in front of their men.

Who put an end to all this? Pakistanis? No! Again it was the Indian King Yashodharman, who chased the Huns out of India.

The same pattern followed in 712 CE. When the Arabs invaded Pakistan, the Hindu Brahmin King Dahir approached the massive Islamic army of the caliphate with a small force that guarded the capital of Singh. What did the native Pakistani (Buddhists) do?

They opened the city gates for the Arabs and soon enough the Hindu soldiers were completely outnumbered by the Arab invaders. Dahir was killed in battle, as he had promised—“he would either die or defeat the Arabs.”

Soon enough, Pakistan once again was under Arab rule. It was now up to the Indian kingdoms to stop Umayyad expansion into India. And they did. Hindu states from all over India sent armies to stop the Arabs and they were eventually halted by 740 CE. In Pakistan though, they had established themselves as the new rulers and Pakistani women were raped and Pakistanis were sent as slaves. Modern Pakistanis say with pride that the mountains that lie to the West of Pakistan are called “Hindu Kush” which means “Kills the Hindu”. They foolishly believe that it refers to the Hindus of India. But no, it was the people of Pakistan who were historically called Hindu (literally means: “people of the Indus”). Their ancestors were enslaved, converted, raped and subjugated.

Do you see a pattern here? Foreign tribe conquers India -> Pakistanis get enslaved -> Indians drive away the foreign tribe.

The same can be applied even to the Mughals and British! It was the Maratha Confederacy (which started in modern day South Western India) that defeated the Mughals! And the vast majority of Indian freedom fighters came from modern day India despite Pakistan making a significant amount of population.

It is truly a tragic history. A nation that once was the home of the Indus civilisation in 2600 BCE had its women being used as cocksleeves by every other group. No wonder they are “whiter”. But still, they aren’t white.

They call us “black shitskin Hindus” on the internet and in real life, and thank God for that!

topkek

are Pakis Mleccha in the Hindu worldview?

Yes, except the tribes of Gandhara which went extinct after Achaemenid conquest, most of the tribes there were described as Mlechhas. To be fair, even the Dravidas were described as a mlechha tribe, when the King of the Dravidas, Ikshvaku was the man who created the Solar dynasty of which Rama is a descendent of. (The same Rama in “Hare Rama, Hare Krishna!”

Nobody cares, you chimps are more annoying than even balkaniggers and japs/gooks with their constant bickering.