Can Americans explain this?
Can Americans explain this?
Alexander Cook
Justin Cook
please die right now
Adam Moore
Shit ton of preservatives, I guess.
We have the same problem.
Jack Hughes
SOVL vs soulless
Xavier Powell
It's still less than in the US tho. Compare Canadian fruit loops vs American one if you don't believe me
Fuck off sandnigger go. Fuck a pig
Angel Russell
FDA requires that umbrella ingredients be broken down to scientific compounds
(((natural flavoring)))
Brody Garcia
Why so much shit on oats though
Julian Johnson
Is that the same for Supplements? Like whey protein
Parker Garcia
because it scientifically makes the food taste better. Just because it has a big name or acid tied to it doesn't make it bad. I bet you think Dihydrogen Monoxide is bad too.
Sebastian Hill
No. You already know the answer. Stop asking.
Grayson Barnes
Breh...
>I need these 357 acids to make OATS taste better, totally common bruh
You guys have fucked up palate from all. The sugar and fat you consume.
Ayden Gray
There are dozens of naturally occuring acids in fruit you eat everyday
Eli Gonzalez
>oats
>fruit
Yank education
Xavier Long
>dried apple
>dried strawberry
did you even look at the OP retard
Parker James
How dare you reply to me
Christopher Roberts
Ah right, that makes sense I was thinking I would have been something along the lines of a legislative issue.
Aaron Perry
>hehe I know water's molecular name which means I have a high IQ and any argument you have against unhealthy chemicals in your food is moot, because water is a chemical, therefore all chemicals are fine, stupid people
Asher Ramirez
Are you incredibly insecure of something? His argument wasn't to state the 'scientific name' of water - in fact, he didn't; he wrote it in a seldom-used expanded format to illustrate that terms that have scientific conotations may appear intimidating. Dihydrogen monoxide is not a common name for water (and it is not really the scientific name for it; it's scientific name is just water talk to IUPAC about it) - and most people won't recognise it is water at first glance due to people's lack of experience in scientific nomenclature. It is desirable for companies to list compounds in 'common' names as to not induce confusion in the populace purchases said product, note however, this doesn't occur in the American section of OP.
Aaron Cooper
All of the stuff in the left one is in the right one, just labeled as "natural flavouring".
Daniel Murphy
>chemicals are bad because they make me think of science fiction movies
I bet you call GMOs "frankenfoods" as well
Ayden Walker
Why does Zig Forums love the appeal to nature fallacy so much when talking about food?
Jose Thomas
>OH MY GOD A BUNCH OF UNFAMILIAR CHEMICAL NAMES, THEY MUST BE POISON!!
Lincoln Howard
Haha holy shit imagine typing out that entire paragraph out of sheer rage
Evan Smith
Honestly surprised it has sugar instead of high fructose corn syrup
Jackson Miller
Not exactly, left has artificial components.
Justin Campbell
Cope, US version still has shit not present in the UK version
Charles Martin
They're different products.
Grayson Young
You don't actually know that since the US and UK have different laws pertaining to what needs to be listed.
Ryan Adams
>the product from the "oat so simple" line has fewer ingredients than the instant oatmeal with cream
I'm floored.
Christopher Jones
you can choose to buy regular oats. instead you use a cherry picked (oat picked?) image of two different products.
Alexander Long
Czeched and this