Why do people make fun of Turks for not being turkic when even central asian turkics are only 40-50% turkic

why do people make fun of Turks for not being turkic when even central asian turkics are only 40-50% turkic
whats up with this selective bullying

Attached: unnamed (9).jpg (512x334, 81.67K)

Because you retards are so obsessed with ethnicities and eugenics you completely ignore that turkic is a linguistic group

by that logic Americans are Germanic and Frenchmen are Latin

correct

Central asians used to be iranians, caucasians, actual turks come from the north east

>when even central asian turkics are only 40-50% turkic
that's 39 to 49% more turkic than turks

Yes. Turkicks are a linguistic family, not an ethnic one.

I just don't like Turks. The bullying doesn't have to be logical

>Turkic DNA
Easiest way to out yourself as a slobbering brainlet without any knowledge for genetics

it's both
you speak a turkic language but you aren't fully genetically turkic
true

>it's both
Not isn't you nonse. Stop spouting bullshit.

I'm going to conquer a place in central india and make them learn a Turkic language and then they will be Turkic brothers to you because "Turkic is just a linguistic identity"

You are talking nonsense again. Eat some snacks

Attached: Uo6xIQhVoJoBpxVXcn31hH_gD5Th299Yktrzk2g6XE0.png (551x444, 182.88K)

Yes that's what linguistic group is

Fake picture from a fake ethnic.
If The Democratic Republic of the Congo spoke Chagatai would they be a Turkic people?

...

>Turkic dna
what is this really? do you think east eurasian adm = turkic dna? Do you have any evidence to suggest that earliest turks were 100% east eur?

All you need to know that indo-poos are the orginal pure white people, while non-aryans are mutts.

>by that logic Americans are Germanic and Frenchmen are Latin
How long did it take for you to know this?

okay that's a massive cope but if that's what you want to believe than I can't help you
same as with other groups. germans and danes and proto germanics are 90+% the same in terms of descent
Original turkics from mongolia/siberia compared to Turks are extremely different. Turks only have like 1-10% make turkic descent depending on the person

Are bulgarians slavic or turkic?

English is my first language but I am not Germanic. Simple as.

how is an austrian and an icelandic 90% same again?

Slavic but they have some turkic history/culture.
Hungarians are also slavic but they speak a finno-urgic language
Slavs are infamous for stealing history.
Macedonians stole the name Macedonian
Russians stole the name Rus'
etc.

itt
>American showing the power of ignorance of matters outside his nation

Why are you ignoring the centuries lasting Central Asian migration to Anatolia and speaking as if Anatolia was conquered by 3 samurais on horseback and assimilated the local population with wolololo cheat code, Armenian subhuman?

Also Mongoloid /=/ Turkic. You would know this if you were actually interested in genetics and not an monobrow desert jogger spilling his asshurt towards Turks.

Attached: 1547210443420.png (1044x1382, 129.62K)

an austrian and an Icelander can trace the vast majority of their ancestry to the proto-germanics.

They were always mutts

call me what you like but don't call me arm*nian
you are more armenian than me

Attached: 1596953339052.png (2189x1030, 1.13M)

Nigga people change the language whole the time if it's convenient. The people themselves are not getting replaced, only the language and culture.

umm? Their similarity between turks is 56% while their similarity between icelandics are 66% that's like a 10% difference? does this mean Turks are 80% germanic? by your assumption that austrians are 90% germanic? (whatever that means)

Attached: f721cc2ab87306c8b4fd7f2818253a5a.png (2092x1698, 139.82K)

Okay, subhuman rape baby diaspora whose irrelevant ethnicity got conquered by Turks no 1453. Do you like your new nickname?

Vienna was literally a celtic settlement, as was the most of western and central eeurope. The level of mental gymnastics you apply to call the turks non-turkic is astonishing. Yet somehow you don't apply same logic to bulgarians or germanics

Excuse me but what is slavic culture? Honest question. What do balkans and russians have in common? Cultural differences even among balkan slavs are huge. That's why they have had so many wars even in the recent past

i didn't say anything about slavic culture, I just said bulgarians have some turkic history/culture

What about the people who lived there before these "proto germanics" Indo-european languages overall aren't native to most of europe. Keep in mind the pre history goes back tens of thousands of years before there were any "germanics" "slavs" etc. That's rather recent history

>Y-Dna
you realize one rapist can change an entire people's Y-dna while barely touching the rest of the genome?
The entirety of central europe was celtic, they got largely replaced, but it's not comparable to turkics. most turkics are more native than turkic

self hating armenian

I could ask the same about turkic culture as well That's even way more diverse than subject than "slavic" culture. How much do think these people have in common? They're separated by thousands of kilometers almost another side of the planet

Attached: The_distribution_of_the_Turkic_languages.png (2138x1070, 1.99M)

yeah Y-Dna is the more important part of tracing lineage since you are more likely to take your language, culture religion etc. from your father than your mother

>if fits my argument, then: "replaced"
>Else: "not comparable"
Wew

We are, we stopped being anglo a long time ago

t. self hating Turk

Why do you hate your daddy?

Attached: 446px-Gottfried_Sieben_-_Balkangreuel_-_05.jpg (446x600, 90.72K)