Why have caucasians created most of human civilization?

Attached: main-qimg-0309e312bfee293ddbecfd1c64ae05b3.jpg (602x239, 59.56K)

I don't see any Dagestani/armenian creating any civilization

genetics

It's not about race, it's about climate. That's why only Caucasians, chinks and native Americans created civilizations while nobody to the south or north of them did.

I study history and this is the correct answer.
Consider the following:
The further north or south you go from the approximate latitude of the mediterranean, the harder it gets to find advanced old civilisations.
Look at my home, Scandinavia for example, which is way north and didn't develop real civilisation until 800 AD. The Australian aboriginals way south hadn't even thought of anything resembling a civilisation before Europeans arrived.

To add on to my point about Scandinavia, it depends what you mean by "real" civilisation. We didn't become proper well-adapted and civilized European christian kingdoms until the ~11th century and later.

im proud to be the left-most one

Attached: 3A1FB3F3-947C-49F5-8711-164B699F59F1.jpg (2155x2701, 1.19M)

God please gib n. 1 or 2 bf from left

Yes it's gnenetic. Climate shaped our genetic.
Men in the north had to cooperate, think ahead and adapt in order to survive. Their brain changed the same way you breed dogs for certain traits. And these characteristics are hereditary.
So yes it's clilate which influenced genetics

Attached: IMG_3671.jpg (867x1134, 95.07K)

its that we were chosen by god

Out of 40000 years humanity you are relevant for 500.
>think ahead
Thanks for the dark age and setting humanity back 500 years

This is why he is letting brownies colonize and destroy us?

You're correct up to a certain point. Cooperation, thinking ahead and adapting only gets you so far. If you live in a temperate continental European country this will build you a civilisation unlike any other, such as France, but if you live in the rocky ice cold climate of e.g. Greenland, you won't go forward even nearly as fast. Same goes for the barren scorching hot literal murder machine of a desert in Australia, where the aboriginals sat for 50 000 years without so much as inventing a wooden wheel. See

speak 4 urself croissant

Europe has pretty mild weather overall even the northernmost part. Shouldn't this mean eskimos and siberians to have the best genetic? They had the worst climate byfar

Larger prefrontal cortex, stronger physique, better endurance, soul (aka voice in your head while thinking and not images).

being 30 and still posting on 4chin. bro what happend?

im 18

that is inland aus, abbos have no fucking excuse cause the coast is very livable

china is the only real civilization

Attached: 1598102813919.jpg (1024x682, 66.9K)

I'm speaking about the time Europe was covered in ice. Also having seasons and winters, forces you to planify etc, something brownies were exempted of

That was a long time ago. There are people who lived in more harsh climates in siberia and northern america just 100 years ago or so. Overall when it comes to climate europe is easy mode

Let your hair grow a bit more bro. Will look better. Comb it back and to the side and slay pussy here

Okay, well none lived in Northern Europe then. Whites are caucasians and come from the area around the black sea, but there were druidic and high cultures near the netherlands and in France, Germany as well. In Norway 1500BC we had these hornblower culture with druids and it went on for milleniums. Around that time germans and celts occupied the west and greece was at it's golden age.

Industrial revolution was the thing which made (northern)Europe relevant. European hegemony is rather a recent phenomenon

Are you really saying that we were irrelevant before, like we wasn't exploring and colonizing the world before that?

Europeans mostly just colonized primitive people in stone age. Industrial revolution made colonized made indian colonization possible and cucking china. That happened much later

And industrialization in Japan made them the most powerful country in Asia. China had no chance against them

I think colonizing America was maybe the hardest. Then we have Africa which we civilized. I agree, 1800s were our golden age.

Huge nigger cope

It's the exact opposite actually, having your brain focusing on survival makes creating civilization. That's why humanity stayed the same since forever until they discovered farming, at that time they no longer needed to worry about randomly getting attacked by a tiger or worrying about food 24-7 and they could focus on other things.

cope harder Tyrone

What cope? The city I'm living in is 10000 years old, show me a European city the quarter its age lmao.

they would claim that the people that built it are closer to european than modern day jordanians

makes sense, the horn of africa is the only other place to invent the wheel, have empires and multiple civilization in SSA.

It's all about skull shape

Azetcs and Maias, Egypt, Mesopotamia, India, China, all of the older civilizations were more or less in the equator.

Reason is: Agriculture. Those who were able to produce more could build greater civs, can't really do much in the northern/southern part of the planet.

Today it's the opposite: The equator is a "shithole" while the northern/southern parts of the planet are way richer and way more developed. The reason is that agriculture is not equivalent to wealth anymore, means of production have changed and industries can be built around pretty much anything.

People that live in colder parts of the planet had to be more systematic and organized while "equatorians" were the equivalent to Saudis back in the day, spending and expanding the empires.

Attached: AsokasQueen.jpg (385x500, 41.23K)

It's more about the climate, not about race.

The town I am living in has been inhabited by aboriginals for 50,000 years, show me a Jordanian city the quarter of its age lmao