I realized

>Japanese language able to pronounce it's like original more than other languages.
That's a very debatable statement at most clouded by your own bias, Japanese has a reputation overseas for really fucking up the pronunciations of loanwords.

Why don't you learn Korean Mr. Jap? It's the same shit.

youtube.com/watch?v=pv9PKH4BMms

>Japanese has a reputation overseas for really fucking up the pronunciations of loanwords.
you know, recent Japanese English expression made for Japanese English study, but there is a way for more real English pronunciation method.

for example.
I'm taking this girl with me. i don't even care.
ぁいむていきんでぃすがーるうぃずみーぁいどんいぶんけぁ
that is more close to original, maybe other languages are can't describe like that.

...Yes, and non-syllabic languages can loan words with intact pronunciations WAY more precisely. I'm not talking about languages like French and English here. I want you to talk about Ubykh, Dagestani languages, Salishan languages, etc.

In case you don't get it, I'm not saying Japanese can't imitate other languages, I'm challenging your argument that Japanese is THE BEST at imitating other languages. It categorically is not.

Try saying Vietnam to me

Also this lol, Japanese syllables universally end with either a nasal consonant or a vowel which makes it TERRIBLE at adapting to anything. This is similar to Putonghua and certain African languages (Yoruba and Igbo both come to mind) and AT LEAST those languages have a wider syllable repertoire

ヴィェトゥナﾑ

Trump already approved of Abe's Indo-Pacific strategy.
India will soon join our squad, Vietnam too.
The more chinks act cocky with expansionism, the more countries will join our squad.
This is Japan's great plot. It will go down as Abe's best legacy.

Read this:

Success Of Indo-Pacific Strategy "Impossible" Without India: Top US Envoy
ndtv.com/india-news/top-us-diplomat-stephen-biegun-says-indo-pacific-strategy-cant-succeed-without-india-2288372

China (*Canada) man triggered so hard, insisting ching chong missile to Tokyo, kek to read
asiatimes.com/2020/08/why-us-indo-pacific-strategy-will-fail/

Attached: 1601048482464.webm (640x360, 2.9M)

Proves my point

but every language has a strange rule and they can't pronounce like original, but Japanese language is not.
that's why i said Japanese language is the number one language that able to pronounce foreign words like original.

No, it's more like original.

Japanese can't emphasise R vs L and can't emphasise the word not having a non-vowel ending
For example in russian
Pyкa (hand)
ルカ (perfectly accurate)
Лyкa (onion, genetive case)
ルカ ? doesn't work
Лyк (onion, nominative case)
ルック is wrong because it becomes Лyкy (accusative case)
How else can you do this? I can't think of ways
Even ルックッ doesn't reflect it because once again it's ku
That all considering that we now somehow switched from R to L, however Pyкy and Pyк are also valid declensions of Pyкa (手)

>but every language has a strange rule and they can't pronounce like original, but Japanese language is not.
What do you even mean by this? I'm exasperated.
>Japanese language is the number one language that able to pronounce foreign words like original.
Show me ONE Japanese sentence that cannot be written with consonants that are phonologically present in Ubykh.

I think your English is getting in the way of me understanding you.

Attached: file.png (1581x737, 72.56K)

This is just one of the problems of claiming Japanese can precisely represent other languages' sounds.

I want OP to pick ONE sentence from this website (just ONE) and transliterate it with Japanese.
tulaliplushootseed.com/phrases/
Can Japanese represent labialised consonants? Can it represent pharyngeal and glottal stops? Can it represent complex phonemes that are not simple plosives of fricatives? I want to see OP argue how Japanese can do any of these.

but that is also Russian language can't dscribe R and L.
yes, i know, Japanese language is not perfect, just able to describe more than other languages.

ロシア語はRとLの区別があるけど

には

No it is not.

I'll simplify it for you since you've demonstrated you've understood absolutely nothing I've said.

The Japanese consonant inventory is shown in pic related.

The Ubykh consonant inventory is show in this post .

Therefore, since Ubykh has FAR more consonants than Japanese, Ubykh can represent the consonants of loanwords FAR more precisely than Japanese.

The same is true of vowels in Japanese vs vowels in English, Chechen, or Turkish. Japanese has a very poor inventory of BOTH vowels and consonants. This makes it the opposite of adaptable as you claim.

The Japanese language cannot even transcribe EXTREMELY SIMPLE languages. For example Polynesian languages (which are notoriously simple in both their consonant and vowel inventories) would fail to be transcribed by Japanese. Try using Japanese to represent the Fijian provinces of Cakaudrove or Macuata, or the islands of Hawaii, Kahoolawe, or Savaii. Or the Tahitian town of Faaa, or one of many Palauan state names that start with the velar nasal consonant (Ngatpang, Ngchesar, Ngeremlengui...)

Attached: file.png (804x404, 27.5K)

>What do you even mean by this? I'm exasperated.
maybe you know most of languages can't pronounce like original, i think that because most of languages has a strong syllables and that prevent foreign original pronunciations, but Japanese language is very neutral.

>I think your English is getting in the way of me understanding you.
yes, thank you for communicate with my English, i'm so sad i can't express more like i want to say.

Abe also outperformed South Korea with this well-prepared plot.
Gooks must choose which side to be, Indo-Pacific, or China's OBOR.
If they choose OBOR, we will immediately kick them out of our political/economic spheres.

SK will return to a chink province, the pre-1st Japan-Sino war period.
Gooks will know their place.

>maybe you know most of languages can't pronounce like original, i think that because most of languages has a strong syllables and that prevent foreign original pronunciations, but Japanese language is very neutral.
You are attacking other languages' intonations which is premature when I am making the (far more important) point that Japanese is so lacking in a phonological inventory that it cannot transcribe properly the MANY examples of words and phrases I have given you, none of which you have addressed.

ロシア語は巻き舌ともう一つのルの発音があるけど、英語のRとLとはまた別物でしょ?