Which part is the best?
Which part is the best?
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
none
Cope
German
I heard it's Warsaw and then the South, but the South is also depressive because it's an industrial shithole.
I feel sorry for g*rmoids
they can only lose and be cucks of everyone around them
Might want to check your flag
imagine getting annexed lmao
West = desert, east = swamp, south = mordor.
Nothing good in here.
Damn. Why don't you move to Germany then?
Why?
I'm the last Pole. Someone has to post with Polish flag.
>but the South is also depressive because it's an industrial shithole.
only Upper Silesia
Does railway density = soul?
I expected the difference, but i'm still surprised by the amount. Is it current, or historical? Neither would be less impressive, actually.
Imagine dying in mass shooting lmao
Define the best.
Also I prefer this en.wikipedia.org
Poland A is richer, has better infrastructure and people are more progressive.
Poland B is not that rich and have worse infrastructure, lower wages and so on (ofc I'm not talking about Warsaw, which itself is pretty much western European level city).
People also are more 'right wing' politically there.
god Im glad Im not black
western part has more interesting architecture but is usually worse maintained
eastern part is the opposite
>Is it current, or historical?
It was like that until the 1990s when a lot of rail tracks in Poland were removed as rail transport was considered obsolete so nowadays the difference is smaller. But now since the EU deemed the rail transport the future of transport in the EU some tracks are getting rebuilt
so all of poland is shit? checks out
>Poland A is richer, has better infrastructure
this is what westoids believe
Yeah some soul, it had huge influence on small town development in Europe. Hamlets that god a station, build a hotel, a upp class warehouse, a resturant, post office and so on, in the architectural style of 1850-1900, which is soul.
But rail density also meant development, and mobility (still today), so a lot more activity went on their, which results in much better developed areas. And today, there's a big difference by a regional/local train, rather than a bus. Besides all the obvious benefits, there's the "rail factor". The effect physical rail has on an area. It might be the intuition that a bus can always have its rute changed, or easlily be shut down unexpectedly, but the rails would at least require political activity (which doesn't happen suddenly anywhere, as you know) so house prices go up, and people tend to centralize closer to rails. In Denmark we're talking about +50% house prices, in the same area, if you're within 1200 meters, (36000 feet?) of a station, whilst also attracting a more diverse population (Not as in american skin colour diverse, it's actually having a positive affect on ghettos as diverse means everybody)
IM GONNA COOOOOOM
Poland A has some Switzerland-tier towns but also third world Bangladesh-tier shitholes
Poland B is more egalitarian, pretty much all the towns look average
t. Ukrainian
yes thats the joke
no shit sherlock
I'm not talking about Poland "A" or "B". I'm talking about Austrian Poland, German Poland, and Russian Poland.
left: soulless
right: soul
Green
Bitches love green
>Poland bad
>Define the best.
Soul, beauty and quality of life
Biedronka... home...
none, nuke this ''country''