different type of few Alphabet is very useful, why don't you do like that?
Why you can satisfied only one Alphabet?
English, with its single script and simplified grammar, is far more efficient for communication. You wouldn't understand because your culture cannot be exported to the world except to paedophiles and NEETS.
We don't need it because one alphabet is enough to reproduce every sound of our language
No, English is like computer language, very very chill and unemotional, that's why English speakers are easy to fallen to capitalism, they thinking only efficiency.
Japanese language's these three Alphabet is make able to expression to appeal more variable expression and logical thinking, that's why Japanese is a smart and very very social races.
that's why you can't be like Japanese.
>very very social races.
Wanna be my friend?
Only domain specific languages like mathematics use different glyphs, by borrowing them usually
Teach me sempai
yeah, i want be lot of friends.
Hey 日本野郎, watch this: small letter, BIG LETTER
ほしい?
Ok, please after me.
ore wa kono chikyuu no daichi to natte sakimidareru hana to narunoda!!
we have almost no homophones
Uhm o-ore wa chiyo no daiki to nate sakimidaretu ha-hana to narunoda
hu, nowadays English is almost Japanese language.
very good
(´・ω・)d
most of language has a one word multi meaning system.
but Japanese three characters are able to separate describe on the one sentence.
because latin alphabet is superior
Konnichiwa b(^.^)d
yes we know how useful latin alphabet and we usually using latin alphabet too.
just i recommend multi alphabet system.
kombanwa (*´ω`*)ゝ
and i recommend you get rid of all your 3 alphabets and go latin
Good Lord... Learn to read. We have almost no homophones. Kurwa is probably the only multimeaning word we have. 2nd to it is Zamek which have 3 meanings - castle, lock and zipper. Other homophones like "zwarzyć&zważyć" or "lód&lud" are spelled differently because we spell words according to their etymologies and they are homophones only in nominative case because they conjugate differently.
>just i recommend multi alphabet system.
But it would be useless in european language desu senpai
Ore wa ochinchin ga daisuki nandayo (○ω○)~
4 alphabets is very useful actually we use every languages words so we have a multi alphabet system.
you need more alphabets because they all are bad, latin is perfect and could easily replace your current ones
>latin is perfect
>can't even show palatalisation
>we spell words according to their etymologies and they are homophones only in nominative case because they conjugate differently.
that is point of multi alphabet.
for example しろ
Japanese language able to describe
白、城、思路、シロ etc
we immediately imagine such a words and distinguish multimeaning.
>But it would be useless in european language desu senpai
someday please try multi alphabet.
>Ore wa ochinchin ga daisuki nandayo (○ω○)~
mine for girl
>someday please try multi alphabet
Ok
This means pizza @#&
@ is the dough
# is the tomato
& is the mozzarella
>can't even show palatalisation
polish alphabet can do this
How do you do that?
>latin is perfect and could easily replace your current ones
really? i can't imagine latin's real potential.
(; ・`д・´)
>How do you do that?
ok, i can explain it for you, but it will take some time
Or you could adopt the latin alphabet, put spaces between your words and do like we do in french and have a different spelling for most homophones. We probably have just as many homophones as you do and we've managed to find a way to get by easily.
For instance:
la pâte = pastry, dough, paste
les pâtes = pasta
la patte = paw
all pronounced the same way, another example would be.
pair (adjective) - even
le pair - peer
la paire - pair
le père - father
that is nice.
i want @#& but on the @ please rid the # and put more &
I can't learn this shit.
I haven't even gotten to kanjis.
You can simplify, we have very similar phonology between our languages
You mean that you add j or something?
>put spaces between your words and do like we do in french and have a different spelling for most homophones. We probably have just as many homophones as you do and we've managed to find a way to get by easily.
yeah, maybe that is the same reason why three alphabets is very useful, on the sentence we can distinguish exact meaning instantly by three alphabets.
and we don't need space thanks of three alphabets.
例えていうなら私は三つの文字を正確に使い分けられるので空間は要らないのだ。
all romance language have some of it
I can give you a focaccia where the & is directly inside the @
I already know cursive.
>I can give you a focaccia where the & is directly inside the @
that's sounds tasty!
( ・∀・)
>yeah, maybe that is the same reason why three alphabets is very useful, on the sentence we can distinguish exact meaning instantly by three alphabets.
The thing is, you're probably just culturally biased on the matter, in term of raw information you can put in a single sentence, chinese characters might be better than latin alphabet but as for the efficiency and the time it requires to learn all those three, it's clearly not the best, which is another reason to why latin alphabet is widely used where as your 3 alphabets or just chinese characters in general are just limited to a few places, because it takes an awful while to learn let alone mastering those.
I've been learning japanese for quite a while now, and knowing that it will take me another few years to be able to read something comfortably is very frustrating to me(because not everything has furigana, though I can read quite a lot of kanjis), and I'm not even including learning how to write kanjis because that would take me probably another 5 years lol.
>on the sentence we can distinguish exact meaning instantly by three alphabets
But we can too thanks to the spelling as well, so what's your point?