Why did the french revolution try to remove all titles and remove the titles instead of just making all the current...

Why did the french revolution try to remove all titles and remove the titles instead of just making all the current French residents and speakers nobility?

Attached: 1600767830652.jpg (1080x1350, 157.97K)

Because the nobility was hated

You post this pic everyday. Can't you get some new whores?

>Because the nobility was hated
The French government could have just issued certifications for ennoblement of the citizens and the people would all be equal under laws as French nobility.

>Why did the french revolution try to remove all titles and remove the titles instead of just making all the current French residents and speakers nobility?
all man are king ?

holy fuck i love women i wish i could just have sex with them all day

post more of these honeys, or give me the sauce

No, the point of what I said was that nobility as a term was hated. It's the same as why Napoleon decided to call himself emperor instead of king.

Sort of yes.
>No, the point of what I said was that nobility as a term was hated. It's the same as why Napoleon decided to call himself emperor instead of king.
It wouldn't be hated if all of the French citizens had ceremonies to become nobility with certificates of nobility.

Or another example, why Robespierre called it the Cult of the Supreme Being instead of simply using the term God.

Based, the only thing that matters is SEX SEX SEX. Post more

What do their boyfriends look like?

This belongs on /his/ but the answer is because they hated the nobility and granting everyone nobility made no sense at all.

>granting everyone nobility made no sense at all.
Why not?
I would prefer having a title to my rights as historical power of nobility than an assurance by the government of my rights and position.

>There are roughly 4,000 noble families that remain in France today, with anywhere between 50,000-100,000 individuals who could be considered noble. Surprisingly, this is about the same amount of nobles as in the late 18th century before the French Revolution occurred.

>There are roughly 4,000 noble families that remain in France today, with anywhere between 50,000-100,000 individuals who could be considered noble. Surprisingly, this is about the same amount of nobles as in the late 18th century before the French Revolution occurred.
Did any of the nobility in Russia survive?

see Part of the point is in the name. Did you know the Terror wasn't a name given after the fact? It was what the revolutionaries called the event before it happened and as it happened.
> Bertrand Barère exclaimed on 5 September 1793 in the Convention: "Let's make terror the order of the day!"[6][7]
>Robespierre in February 1794 in a speech explained the necessity of terror: :"If the basis of popular government in peacetime is virtue, the basis of popular government during a revolution is both virtue and terror; virtue, without which terror is baneful; terror, without which virtue is powerless. Terror is nothing more than speedy, severe and inflexible justice; it is thus an emanation of virtue; it is less a principle in itself, than a consequence of the general principle of democracy, applied to the most pressing needs of the patrie [homeland, fatherland].[8][4]"
They were obsessed with names. It's not "putting down revolt", it's "extermination of rebels". It's not "military division", it's "infernal column".

The Russian nobility (Russian: двopянcтвo dvoryanstvo) originated in the 14th century. In 1914 it consisted of approximately 1,900,000 members (about 1.1% of the population).

how many in Russia are nobility?

Yep, in France=)
How that connects to topic?

BTW I'm not sure how much I'm getting through to you, so in case it isn't clear. The revolution came from the estates, where the common people were locked out by the nobility and the classes. This meant that the character of the revolution was not about lifting the common people UP in a model, but replacing the model. They wanted to create a new society, and part of the way they tried to do this was with language (in some ways they even succeeded, as people in France now identify as "French"). Look at how they promoted the term "sans-culottes" (without breeches) which as term is a reminder of being poor and low class. The term "nobility" would have been too poisoned. Being a peasant was a mark of honor.

seems retarded to have a new system with no definition than to grant the highest title of privileges to the citizenry which you care about having rights and powers.

well the revolutionaries were fanatics of their time, did you really expect them to sit down and patiently work this issue out?

Attached: 1584155010631.jpg (710x711, 121.03K)

>well the revolutionaries were fanatics of their time, did you really expect them to sit down and patiently work this issue out?
well my idea is something new so they most likely never thought about but they would think about it if I told them.

(((because)))

>well my idea is something new so they most likely never thought about but they would think about it if I told them.
it's more likely you'd be called counterrevolutionary and killed because it goes against their naming sense.

Attached: 1575750734405.jpg (1080x1082, 210.27K)

Look at the fucking toilet on the bitch on the left.

More annaleeze

that sounds like a lot of work to make everyone equal
why not make everyone equal.... but without all the extra effort?

Communists

>that sounds like a lot of work to make everyone equal
Establishing a nobility registry for 40 million french and giving them certificates of nobility is too effort?
I know that anything new would make you feel like you're dumb if it was a good solution because you did not come up with the idea you would think it must be incorrect.