>Americans don't distinguish it's and its in spoken language
Americans don't distinguish it's and its in spoken language
Bentley Morgan
Other urls found in this thread:
Asher Watson
I don't even know the difference in written form
Leo Kelly
It’s- it is
Its is a determiner we use to say that something belongs to or refers to something
William Ross
It's pretty easy to tell by context. Also English people and Irish and Scots and Aussies and Kiwis and fucking nobody distinguishes it. Also:
>春 and 張る
>成る and 鳴る and なる
Same thing, different languages. English isn't special.
Nathaniel Roberts
t. pvt. Joe Gomez
Jordan Wood
>its and it's
>ran and run
>began and begun
>their they're and there
>to too and two
and so many more that i don't know the difference between and cbf to learn
Ayden Adams
It's quite simple, the context of the usage will be perfectly understandable, the possessive and conjunction are not overlapping in grammar function.
Chase Williams
>native english speaker can't distinguish between
>>ran and run
>>began and begun
>while I can
>tfw
Angel Rogers
BTW 春/貼る and 成る/鳴る have different pitch accent.
Wyatt Jenkins
dont need to know the difference, people will understand what i mean anyway and it sounds right to my ear either way
Jeremiah Moore
انا ما افرق بين ال ض و ال ظ
Alexander Williams
I am proud of my best language in the world.
Isaac Kelly
coping
youtube.com
googoo gaagaa
Jaxson Adams
You speak English natively? Good lad!
Brody Price
>that post
>that flag
your language is riddled with homophones.
Justin Hall
affect and effect kills me
Mason Butler
i just cheat and say 'impact' instead
Jack Hill
>no t-v distinction
>"do" support
>-s double purpose
>not full pro-drop
>needs to borrow words from other languages for a simple conversation
Jace Hughes
>impact
>impacted by
>the impact of
Dylan Allen
morze (sea) - może (maybe)
Bóg (God) - Bug (name of river) - buk (beech)
kot (cat) - kod (code)
dom (home) - tom (volume [of books])
ważyć (to weigh) - warzyć (brew)
mieć (to have) - miedź (copper)
bród (ford) - brud (dirt, filth)
lód (ice) - lud (the people)
kolaż (collage) - kolarz (cyclists)
And many, many more
Landon Lewis
read olde english sometime
basically the language is very loose and free-form with words being made up and prefixes being slapped on things all over the place. It's only later the dictionary autists came along and decided to apply rigorous rules of grammar to every little thing. As if misplacing a punctuation mark in my completely arbitrary language rules is the biggest sin in the universe
Owen Lopez
???
These are easily distinguished.
Nathaniel Lewis
holy shit you folk suck
>effect
>affected by
>the effect of
James Thomas
I'm afraid your post isn't as clever as you think it is.
Carson Ortiz
>I'm afraid your post isn't as clever as you think it is.
Aaron Morales
you poorly composed whatever you're trying to convey
Mason Nelson
you will never write beautiful english prose
William Garcia
They speak Jiggbonics, not English
their, they're, there is same too
your and you're becomes ur when typing
Jason Wood
To be quite frank, our shared American English is the only consistent English around.
Henry Gonzalez
>I don't even know the difference in written form
Swap the person:
>I'm, you're, it's all have apostrophe
>my, your, its don't have apostrophe
Noah King
Do-support is one of the most convoluted ways I've found across languages to ask a question. (What's wrong with Mandarin style interrogative particles? Or just, you know... intonation?)