Why must Westerners be so much better at literally everything?

islam proves itself, its internal logic is sufficient. It doesn't need anything else

geography

>Logic
Kek

islam was on the cusp of a reformation and I think if it went all the way through there would be an Arab superpower. what went wrong? were the very well educates scholars just abnormalities dispite islamic governments? or were they created by them? I really dont understand aribic history

not at cooking and have sex
thats why they are dying off, lack of edible food and no sex make them self terminate

We put the interests of our community before personal greed.

lol

>logic
Excuse me, that's haram.

Attached: 1601171434516.jpg (900x520, 60.22K)

>Being this brainwashed by the elite

I'd call you cattle but you're not that valuable to them.

western ideals like critical thought and scientific inquiry are false gods. They make the worshipper stray from the teachings of the all-knowing and Aoozobillah, cause him to entertain simian ancestors, genderlessness and fucking the anus

I am the best at autism.

It's your stupid language. Their language carries more information so they use less energy to speak and more energy and time to think.

south korea is better at gaming than all of us

Culture shift after the mongols came

mongol rape + printers overruled as haram by some retards which made europe progress beyond

just git gud

Seriously now, retards have been meddling around with the definition of "Western" just for this reason. Originally "Western" referred to the Western side of the Schism and Western Rome, and yet "hurr durr development".

Krauts are shit tier though, they lost both world wars, and now are American vassal.

Most of Islamic Golden Age came from Persians, you dumb mutt savage.

theres no such thing as "western culture" amerikkkans made that up.

based

A retarded and silly theory.

There is - the culture spread through Western Rome. What Anglos forget to mention is that, in this regard, they're only marginally Western.

Nah it was equally split everything ended when the mongols and turkics arrived though

It's not. Just look at the information carry rate of English.

Well it did help us mass produce the printing press with about two dozen letters while the chinese had to fuck around with different letter for every single thing in existence.

A language is mostly its spoken form, not its written representation.

>Their language carries more information
The amount of information languages carry is surprisingly similar, as it's the result of two pressures (maximize amount of info conveyed vs. minimize ambiguity and information loss).

westerners are better at being degenerate faggots
Why do you aim to be like that?

>it was equally split
No, it wasn't, you dumb cunt. Persians and Arabs have never worked together. Most of the scholars were Persians mainly because they were a larger population and had preexisting infrastructure from Sassaniands (e.g., Academy of Gundeshapur).
Al-Khwarizmi, Rhazes, al-Tūsī, Avicenna, Khayyam, and etc. were all Persian.
I don't give a shit about Arabs, and I would rather the whole region being nukes than to ever be lumped in with Turks and Arabs. I'd rather die before that happened. I'll fuck cleanse all Abrahamic filth with the divine fire of Zarathustra.
I'll create piles of corpses of Jews, Arabs, and Turks.

Islam heads must be the most autsimo going

Mardavij was close to de-Islamifying Iran, and 20% of Iran was Zoroastrian before Sassanids.

>all that sourness against Semites
And yet last time I checked both Europe and Iran follow Abrahamic thus Semitic folklore.
(I have no bone to pick with Jews and Arabs but let's be frank, their religions are some damn retarded bullshit.)

>Mardavij was close to de-Islamifying Iran, and 20% of Iran was Zoroastrian before Sassanids.
Serious question, why didn't the de-Islamification go through?

Because a Turkish slave killed Mardavij at the most crucial moment when he was close to winning.