SOVL or soulless?
SOVL or soulless?
Charles Martinez
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
Jack Smith
SOVL
Xavier Cook
It's hated by islamists, globohomo shills, neocons, Zig Forumschuds, libcucks, conspiracy theorists, americans and evangelicals. This automatically tenders them SOVLFUL.
Jonathan Baker
soulless but based and redpilled
Nicholas Bailey
The soul and home of the working class everywhere.
Juan Jenkins
why soulless?
Mason Russell
SOVĪ
Zachary Butler
an huge homogeneous class of drones made for work work work only and no fun at all, but at least they were a big pain in the ass for our elites
Bentley Butler
saved
Josiah Barnes
>an huge homogeneous class of drones made for work work work only and no fun at all
wrong country
Cameron Davis
Bentley Watson
ok this is SOVL
Tyler Hernandez
yep, looks like SOVL to me
Oliver Foster
in all relations of humanity it was bad, basically feudalism by a corporate board the party elite.
Jordan Bailey
>basically feudalism
that is capitalism bro. rember to tip the landlord next time you pay the rent
Easton Lewis
sovl but horrible regime
one of the reasons i hate russoa
Isaiah Green
It was pure soul.
I still hate everything it stood for though.
Jackson Flores
This is my list which doesn't respect the human individual as a sovereign person worthy of self determination and autonomy to live their life without being lived by someone elses will.
There is a moral duty of all humans to oppose the existence of this evil and blight to the existence of the human being and its role in this world.
This flag doesn't respect the life of human beings.
Benjamin Jones
Absolutely based ethics.
Andrew Morris
It was an objective failure.
Noah Reyes
SOVL
China is the soulless (but stronger) version
Isaac Lee
SOVL
Leo Lopez
Not at all.
Xavier Baker
This. Only the outcome what is matters. On the other hand they had a lot of achievements and were 2nd strongest power in the world both militaristically and economically.
Still failure is failure. Russians again esteblished themselves as an incompetent.
Julian Howard
SPBP
Liam Scott
why so hard on yourself? many people admired the USSR in its time, you were pioneers in many things.
Jordan Walker
SOVL
excellent post
Gavin Lopez
Based
Eli Jones
Not necessarily. If everything was based on its outcome even Rome could be considered a failure. I think becoming a superpower even with two world wars fought on your backyard and a bloody civil war is pretty impressive.
Austin Garcia
Based
Ryder Hernandez
I am proud of USSR's achievemnets, but the main thing I dislike about them that it basically got corrupted in the lifespan of the 2 generations adn collapsed. And the main reason why? The answer: because the leadership wasn't competent enough to properly guide the country and answer to all the chalenges. Basically the communist party became corrupt and cared only about priveleges for themself, naturally they swept everything under the rug and couldn't reform the economics and let it be ineffective for the decades. Self-isolation doesn't helped either, no new ideas and concepts were adopted and very few modern industrial fields were effectively established.
Basically the Party killed USSR, aka corrupt Russians.
Daniel Lopez
Rome existed for about 1000 years and it's memory forced people want to be called Roman Emperror even long after it's collapse.
The Third Reich or USSR who haven't been around even for 100 years are just laughable, despite their achievements.
Owen Walker
that's the nature of one party monolith systems I'm afraid, stagnation will always lead to corruption, and if this corruption only takes on the form of "bad" aka destructive corruption and never "good" aka productive corruption the whole shebang is destined to crumble, I don't think it's something that can be attributed to Russians in particular.
I agree that the forced isolation and refusal/failure to reform was probably the worst thing about the USSR however.