How accurate is this?

tatar was asian?

Attached: wA9fSFnUU3o.jpg (600x900, 174.6K)

all hail Tengri :DDDDDDDD

Attached: 1603231608411_kindlephoto-396764037.jpg (702x1153, 227.13K)

>i$rael
funny, anyway

Attached: 1602973477154.jpg (1125x889, 67.24K)

Tf nigger where is my race where are the 1.2 Billion. Ex-dad I'm disappointed in you

More like 0,12 billion when that was drawn

Ah yes, the three European groups: the english, the finns and the turks.

Attached: Screenshot_2020-10-20_18-16-32.png (572x600, 84.04K)

shit-tier
race science is the immortal gift of GREEK civilization

WE WUZ SUOMI

>jews
>arabs
>white
no

>putting spainbros and italians in the same box as semites
fuck no

Why do other races love moustaches so much?

Again no mention of my race i want reparations for the sytemic racism and discrimination being done here

Attached: image.jpg (616x498, 23.79K)

Indeed. Like the creation of your fucking hideous country.

where would swedes fit in this hypothetical worldview? or the spanish?

i thought this was /his/ for second lol,

I don't think the Injuns were that black, they were portrayed as tawny or brown before they were deemed "red".
Also, what's the difference between a kaffer and a bushman?

that gray finn

based

Attached: what they fucking deserve.jpg (612x556, 40.06K)

The term white wasn't used

Part of the mixed types: South Asian (Caucasoid-Australoid), Southeast Asian (Mongoloid-Australoid), North Africans (Caucasoid-Negroid), Central Asian (Mongoloid-Caucasoid)

and everything good is english too. they were the movers

kaffer would be bantus or congoloids. Bushman is san people, who are far older as a group and have usually lived on their land longer as well. Sort of like native americans vs solutreans

imagine using finn as part of the root races

caucasoid is usually taken to mean white in the colloquial sense. putting europeans in the same box as middle easterners is inaccurate

>mixed types:
this so stupid
with the same logic Europeans and Arabs are mixture of different ancient groups just like Indians. you made this shit up on your own or what ?
the term Caucasoid doesn't mean much , it not an actual race

wrong

arr look same

As accurate as pseudoscience can get.

>europeans
>modern ottomans
was the distinction in old and modern ottoman really worth noting?

It's more of a craniometric term.

In genetics there is the distinction between West Eurasians (Caucasoid), East Eurasians (Mongoloids), Africans (Negroids) and Australo-Melanesians. It's not just some meme

Attached: e6e55ac9956aa3bd37c93fa737f5fcceb6c26970acbf21571589a9527cded3c0.png (453x150, 106.64K)

>Horner
>Negroid
whoever made this is really autistic. Some of these groups are their own race entirely.

Dont ruin the racecuck circlejerk sweatie this is the most exciting activity of their day.

Caucasoid is only an actual race for 19th pseudo science. How the hell do people with completely different ancestral groups get put into the same group ?

and on this outdated term Indians and north Africans were included too

You're right, I think Sub Saharan would be a better term

The category of Caucasoid has been reaffirmed by modern genetics. East and West Eurasians split off a long time ago after the first humans left Africa and all so-called Caucasoids descend from the West Eurasian branch

They are craniometrically Caucasoid but modern genetics has shown those groups are a mix of West Eurasian and other groups, such as East Eurasian or African. Hence, mixed type.

Why is it that whenever you dig into something bad in human history its always a jew behind it?

False, I'd like to try and see you back that claim up swede boy

Attached: 1541693952196.gif (293x300, 44.62K)

>im a twitter who!
fuck off