I want to talk about the Mexican Revolution. WWI has been talked about ad nauseam. This war though is somewhat of a mystery to me and most Americans in general.
Yet from a glance it seems to be a highly interesting and involved war, and probably one of the most significant wars that Mexico fought in.
Let us converse in this thread.
t. had family who fought in the revolution.
Other urls found in this thread:
>I want to talk about the Mexican Revolution
And don't come back, subhuman.
revolution was what fucked us up
retards fighting for 10 years just to achieve nothing
Go on. Was Madero the good guy?
Were there other BASED women like pic related?
I'm not sure I fully understand the concept of a plan.
As in Plan of Guadalupe, Plan of Veracruz, etc.
Is it basically like a declaration? Are you calling them plan in lieu of deceleration?
no, madero was a naive spoiled kid. when he got the power, he did absolutely nothing useful with it and got killed one year after becoming the president.
America would look so much better if those areas had remained Mexican. Contiguous USA has a disgusting shape.
I have no idea what happened during it, but i hope everyone involved had fun and made friends!
Sure they did
To be frank, that map is KINO.
the only good thing that ever came from that shitshow were the original corridos: youtube.com
Why? I think it looks fine either way.
t. Porfirio Diaz
So true. The real revolution is the friends we made along the way.
Who were the good guys?
VGH..... My amerindian Mexico, what did they did to you?
It was truly the greatest time to be Mexican.
Kill yourself
let me get on my pc and I'll post some stuff for you :3
>history is bad
lmao wtf is your problem faggot
>VGH..... My amerindian Mexico, what did they did to you?
>Their culture was replaced by one of buying groceries at Oxxo and working in car parts factories for Germans
I'VE ABANDONED MY BOY
there were not good nor bad guys, just slightly less retarded ideals and generals. probably the agrarian movement of zapata was the most flawless of all since he focused in giving the farmers the right of owning the lands they worked on
Nobody
Zapata may have been the most based man in Mexico ever.
Zapata was kino in ideals and style.
It wasnt so clear cut
Wack.
>WWI
>mexican revolution
stupid nigger
"If there is no justice for the people, there will not be peace for the government"
The conflict was started by a retard, it lasted more than it needed to and it fixed nothing, but the revolutionary Mexico was peak Mexico and I might as well kill myself now since things will never improve
1910-1920
"Zapata was a man of substance, the proud owner of a solid house... No hacendado had ever paid him to work as a day laborer"
"Industrial labor viewed the Zapatistas with suspicion and distrust, going so far as to form Red Battalions to fight the soldiers of Zapata".
"On matters of faith, [Zapata] was a conservative and a traditionalist."
"Zapata... wanted land for those who tilled it."
Zapata no era comunista ni anarquista, era individualista, simplemente que queria proteger la propiedad privada del hombre comun y tener una sociedad en cual todos tendrian propiedad, lo opuesto al comunismo, y lo opuesto a la oligarquia capitalista
>I hit my brother in 2008, therefore it was part of the iraq war
I'm actually working on a game that's centered on a second Mexican revolution/civil war that erupts in the late 2020s after the US dicks around and attempts to do a coup in Mexico that tries to put a fictionalized PRI back into power and fails.
HOLY BASED
>>I hit my brother in 2008, therefore it was part of the iraq war
Top 10 anime plot twists
Literally the most based thing anyone in history has tried to do.
op wrote about how they never talk about this conflict despite happening at the same time that the ww1
basado
Pancho Villa tampoco fue un comunista ni izquierdista, ideologicamente fue conservador, simplemente queria que el hombre comun pueda mantener sus tierras y tener su propia tierra para cultivar.
Si tendria que describir una ideologia comun entre los revolucionarios (verdaderos revolucionarios, algunos eran solamente reformadores como madero) es que buscaban la propiedad individual, no propiedad "privada" controlada por compañias ni por aristocratas, sino por el hombre comun.
Pancho Villa queria abolir el ejercito despues de su victoria hipotetica. Buscaba una sociedad en cual todos tengan propiedad, armas, educacion, y entrenamiento militar, osea una sociedad en donde la masa seria auto-suficiente y formaba una entidad defensiva.
Porfirio was the basest man alive in the entire world at that time SO DONT SHIT ON HIS NAME FUCKER
>Porfirio was the basest man alive in the entire world at that time SO DONT SHIT ON HIS NAME FUCKER
>Put on white makeup and larped as a Spaniard when dealing with Euros
>Put on brown makeup and larped as a Native son when dealing with Mexicans internally
What a mad lad.
>la alegacion de apoyo gringo
Zapata no fue apoyado por los gringos. Era el pariah de la revolucion Mexicana entre los capitalistas (domesticos e internacionales) junto con su ideologia anti-capitalista (que no necesariamente significa que era comunista o anarquista).
Pancho Villa fue bastante mas pragmatico y buscaba repartir las tierras despues de el fin de la guerra. Zapatista las repartia inmediatamente (esto era mas facil en Morelos con un ejercito defensivo que con el ejercito ofensivo de Villa).
Por el hecho de que no repartiapropiedad gringa recibio (limitado) apoyo gringo del gobierno estadounidense. Esto tenia sentido pragmatico (casi ningunos de sus enemigos conservadores ni izquierdistas atacaban a los gringos porque causaria intervencion gringa, eso mismo le paso al ejercito de Villa).
En cambio Diaz y los contra-revolucionarios fueron los idolos de los gringos por decadas. Solo el progresismo de Taft (que ni fue reelegido) y el desastre que dejo Diaz en sus ultimos años causaron que (a veces) apoyaran a figuras como Villa, cosa que nunca seria permanente.