Based China wrecking western (((profits))).
Based China wrecking western (((profits)))
It's incredibly funny how w*stoids thought they could just do the profitable parts and give the non profitable parts to the Chinese without any negatives and it backfired on them so damn hard.
I dunno what they were thinking when they shipped manufacturing to China.
I don't get this picture
it’s quite poetic how the west will sink itself through its endless desire for cheap products
>We're gonna make so much money now that we don't need to pay those "livable wages" anymore
In the past R&D and customer service were extremely profitable while manufacturing was not very much so, therefore the west got the crazy good idea to ship manufacturing overseas so they don't have to engage in the not so profitable business themselves, but they failed to understand that eventually the overseas manufacturers would realize that they could make more money by taking the R&D and customer service from the west as well leaving the west in a position where overseas companies can do everything they can but cheaper.
and even the current solutions being floated are just to move manufacturing to friendlier impoverished shitholes
couldn’t make this shit up
So capitalism?
As China moves in on the profitable parts of the production loop (R&D, marketing/branding, service), western corporate profits, which increased from reducing production labour costs by moving production to China, will be squeezed as Chinese competitors will undercut them.
China can't just keep on winning forever r-right bros?
Good, fuck this gay earth. We need to become poor again to go back to our senses.
Do you not realize where they are on this curve?
Also, I say all the time on this board that the CCP has been caught red handed in state sanctioned product dumping into Western markets for decades to undermine domestic western ones and control them and every time I say it some CCP shill retard on this board denies it.
And now the west can do the same in SEAsia, Africa and everyone will enjoy high quality of living
Seems based to me :)
I think the CCP view is that the west is too fractured and as long as CCP dangles a billion here and there for American (((corporations))), they will do all the necessary lobbying to prevent any effective embargo against China by the United States. CCP leadership has had Maoist communist education, and they've heard the capitalist will sell you the rope to hang him on a million times, and they've yet to see a credible counter example in that regard.
I just hope things don't get too bad until I die...
That doesn’t justify anything I said and if that’s the case, Western view in response is that economic retaliation is not just justified but necessary...
>wresting western profits
>completely copies western technology and pegs its currency to a western one for 30 years
But what's the point of being justified if it's impossible in practice?
He’s unironically a chink shill that thinks everyone should sit back and let them manipulate their currency and buy billions worth of property in the west, but if we retaliate we’re (((capitalists))).
>polish intellectuals
No, I'm saying the current capitalist order in the west has to be modified in a fundamental way to prevent "the Chinese Century", but I'm not optimistic Western nations will rise to the challenge.
You lost me.
That’s what the Americans are doing, or trying to do, some of them and they get criticized for it. Many on this board would actually have us sit back and let the CCP pay their companies to illegally dump products into the US to destroy our domestic industries. These sometimes aren’t even industries which are internationally competitive. They’re American producer, American consumer...
>let the CCP pay their companies to illegally dump products into the US to destroy our domestic industries
The problem goes way deeper than Chinese state subsidies. They didn't let corporations and the legal elite vastly expand the definition of intellectual properties until everything became patentable and copyrightable, allowing established players to shut out competition with IP lawsuits and create an extremely complacent and stagnant economic system. There has to be a huge reform here, but there is too much money being made for the elite from this private tax system, and with generations of westerners brainwashed to support it, it likely will be impossible.
based china
marx told that the capitalists would sell commies the rope with which commies would hang them
and people still deny that he was right about literally everything
too late now. deng was playing 12d chess while you were playing checkers
he was wrong about literally everything
>declining rate of profit
nope
>communism
never happened
>proletariat would become poorer
lol
>middle class would become smaller
lol
>capitalist class would get smaller
...
here we go again arguing about communism on the internet. I'm not doing it. just keep denying reality while communist china anally rapes you to death
>“The revolution itself might be bloody, Marx thought, but he saw communism as a state of freedom in which the coercive functions of the state would gradually wither away.
>“In order to believe in this possibility, he had to deny that there is a biological basis to human nature, and instead believe that the abolition of capitalism and the common ownership of the means of production would lead to a new kind of unselfish human being who would not need to be coerced to work for the common good.”
unsurprisingly it's never happened, and never been proven by any kind of behavioural science ever
China is state capitalist/national socialist. Read books and stop getting your insights from Zig Forums and youtube memes
>Declining rate of profit
marketrealist.com
Start-ups like Tesla are in the red, so don't even get started there
>Communism hasn't happened
Marx said that the capitalists would give concessions or the workers would revolt. Both have happened. (8 hr working day, sick leave, PTO/ USSR, Frenchoids striking, Miners & Pinkertons)
>Proletariat would become poorer
Where? Marx repeatedly praised Capitalism for its progressiveness, especially for the poor, all he did was note it's internal contradictions and predict it's future.
>Middle class would get smaller
It is.
marketwatch.com
My advice for you is to read Das Kapital or at least The Communist Manifesto instead of interpreting Marx off someone else like you have done here.