Is Australia doing okay?

Is Australia doing okay?

Attached: aus.png (673x384, 39.98K)

They've always been a nanny state just like Britain

BASED, fuck weebs

You've become more authoritarian than America somehow, Aussie. No need to cope. I'm here for you, bro.

Attached: 1600921976254.png (839x768, 410.28K)

>wtf rape is illegal zomg heckin nanny state!!@!!!
shut the fuck up nigger

>images of children, rape, incest, and sexual abuse
one of these things is not like the others

Didn't they only ban lolikon though? Or did they ban all hentai?

> You've become more authoritarian than America
as if it's something bad

this is becoming more true, but this is one ban I can get behind. Weebs are simply not human.

You've managed to conflate rape with literal drawings. You've been completely brainwashed by feminists. There's no hope left for you.

Attached: 1599702086503.jpg (550x535, 40.76K)

i didn't conflate the two, its that you only ever call something a nanny state when its something being banned that you don't want banned. its a kneejerk reaction from retards

What the FUCK?
I'll move to japan if such legislature takes over in the west.

Stop rationalizing banning drawings, user.

They banned all of them. The goal is to prevent loli content from being imported, but to reach this goal, they banned all hentai altogether.

>hentai depicts sexual images of children, rape, incest and sexual abuse

Attached: gasp.jpg (211x239, 9.45K)

>drawings
well if you want to remove all context of what the drawings are then you may as well say that rape shouldn't be illegal because we're all just atoms and you can't ban atoms doing things to other atoms

Attached: indexjj.png (214x236, 7.2K)

not an argument

Attached: 1502223180313.jpg (731x565, 26.35K)

They can get it through other means, at least now nips arent getting ausdole for their shitty scribbles.

Consider the idea that women can have rape fantasies but not want to be actually raped irl.

>nothing matters anyway bro we're all just atoms haha nihilism hack yeah
that's you, but please try again so i can slice your argument in half like sponge cake, you doddering buffoon.

You didn't actually engage with my point, so I guess you don't really have an answer. If you do, try again without making a strawman.

you didn't make an argument. lets start from the beginning. what makes banning what was banned wrong?

All porn should be banned.

Yeah this

>you didn't make an argument
Yes, I did. I argued that you can't draw what people want from reality from their sexual fantasies, because people can have sexual fantasies that do not translate to real world desires. I gave the example of a woman having a rape fantasies and not wanting to be actually raped as an example. Stop being obtuse and pretending you don't understand my point.

Do you guys think Zig Forums should be banned in Australia?

didn't answer my question, why shouldn't it be banned?
yes, then i will be free

>mfw all that asagis getting raped by orc dicks are real

Just because you disagree with something, doesn't mean it should be banned.

then why do we ban things?

Says the nation filled with chink cocksuckers and govt bootlickers

Because they pose an immediate and/or clear threat to the populate of the country of the ban in question you absolute fucking idiot.

Why won't someone think of those poor cartoon children?!? What's the world coming to where you guys so casually ignore the human rights of nonexistant cartoon characters?

but if something is a threat is subjective, so it gets banned if enough people feel that it should be banned, which is if enough people disagree with something being allowed

>didn't answer my question, why shouldn't it be banned?
My criticism is with the logic that sexual fantasies=real world desires. Notice that I can make this criticism without having a position on whether or not forms of sexual fantasies should or should not be banned. I'm merely telling you that if you want to argue that the argument you're making for your position is unfounded, I don't really care about the position itself.
You can argue that all porn should be banned because of your religion or whatever, and I'm not going argue against that, because that's a logically consistent argument whether I agree with the position you reached with the logic or not.

Right, because when you restrict access to something the desire stops existing!

i wasn't conflating real rape with cartoon rape. i should have used a non-rape example to avoid the confusion. my argument is that calling some place a nanny state doesn't mean anything, its entirely a reaction to something being banned that the person thinks shouldn't be banned. if someone wanted rape/murder to be not be banned, he would call a place with rape/murder banned a nanny state

This is the equivalent of the Japanese banning “the mullet” and VB. Mate, nobody gives a fuck about h*ntai over here.

why hasn't your country banned hentai yet?
it's japan only

>nobody gives a fuck about h*ntai over here.
speak for yourself, i wouldn't be surprised if there were many hentai enthusiasts. i thought trannies were an overblown boogeyman until i started seeing them at Coles

spbp