1. country

1. country
2. who is more evil?

Attached: Flag_of_the_United_Kingdom_and_Germany.png (800x400, 8.3K)

g*rmany

russia

They are both incompetent.

Not britain because they defeated hitler quite heroic innit?

Attached: Screenshot_20201024-153804_DuckDuckGo.jpg (625x289, 154.52K)

britain killed to rule, germany ruled to kill so I'll have to say germany

East Germans are annoying, but the rest of Germany is okay. As for the UK, Scotland, Wales, NI are cool and my frens, but England is the land of the Eternal and Infernal Englishman.

So I'd say UK excluding Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland.

britain by a long shot

G*rmany is worse

in which time period?

Hitler was killed by a German

UK

Doesn't matter. G*rmany is always more shit

I thought he was killed by an Austrian

Same thing back then

We are

Attached: haldol-janssen-5-mg-tabletten-tabletten-D02084403-p10.jpg (1182x1182, 98.14K)

power ranking of evil (devious) countries 2020

1. Israel
2. USA
3. Russia
4. Turkey

No. Britain is nowhere near as bad as g*rmany
schizo

Germany. Always have been niggers and always will be.
UK would have lost the war if the US wasn't smuggling shit to them. Britain gave a lot less lives than other countries also, and hardly helped their allies. If Britain weren't such cowards they would have been able to prevent Germany from raping France.

Anglos but only because of international Jewish influence. Anglos started bombing German civilian targets, Germans only answered by bombing London as a revenge. Anglos ended up killing ten times more Gernan civilians during these bombings than Germans killed Anglos.

Frogs are also subhuman war mongers, maybe even worse than Anglos. They start wars but lose every time, then act big when their jewish buddies free them from occupation.

The UK wouldn't have lost the war, they managed to rape the Luftwaffe over Britain and secured their defense. There was no way Germany could have realistically landed on Britain.

Also there was no point in bringing troops to France after Dunkerque, as the French weren't able to hold their positions and had to retreat.

Neither they are good

Brits by a long shot

b&r

Attached: 1602509342272.png (1280x1417, 1.21M)

take your meds already

Fuck UK

Attached: 1601578839157.png (590x469, 230.4K)

>UK would have lost the war if the US wasn't smuggling shit to them. Britain gave a lot less lives than other countries also, and hardly helped their allies. If Britain weren't such cowards they would have been able to prevent Germany from raping France.
They have literally never had a big land army. They had no means to do anything about the Germans, they would have been wiped out like Frog soldiers if they didn't manage to escape.

Anglos have no business in land warfare. They rely on not letting the enemy on their shores.

We are equally based: Very

I didn't say they killed him

Before Britain even declared war on Germany they were receiving military supplies from the US.
Britain could have at least tried to defend France mainland. And they like to act like they did. However, the moment they thought a battle was too costly, British commanders would extract their soldiers.

england

Brits were pretty bad but most of the time they tried to keep peace in Europe unlike G*rms.

Hitler was killed by a brave Austrian man who shot him in the head.

only one of them tried to destroy europe TWICE in 20 years

dum yankoid

We've done more damage on an international scale and we've pretty much fucked the whole world up with central banking and international finance

The point is that tens of thousands of british civilians were still being killed, that should've been enough for Churchill to finally sign a peace treaty.