Does this picture accurately describe your country?

>what is that nig doing in portugal? lol
Because Iberians are moor rape babies.

the fuck's a tydal and why is it so swarthy?

But Moors are semitic looking fellas not blacks.

Iberian women were frequently soled as sex slaves for moor men. Spaniards and portugués people aren’t white.

I look closest to Pre Slavic but I am Anglo and Italian.

north baltic is 100% accurate

Yes

Guess the ethnicity of pic related.

Attached: Couple.jpg (290x320, 38.42K)

Shitholestani

I have never seen anyone who looks like the "North Baltic", that thing just brings to mind a native american or something. Even the very memed Savolaxid is more common, and even that is pretty rare so no they totally fucked up Finland. Unless they're treating the whole Nordic Europe as one place, but I doubt that.

>North Baltic
Hëllo fëllow balts

It's a Native American superimposed upon the place where the Savolaxid is in the original. Just look at Portugal and you'll see that the pic is edited.

come on bro, you can't fall for bait this bad

>Shitholestani
It's somewhere in Europe.

Sort of. Lots of people look like that.
>tfw between Gorid and Neo-Danubian
I should just kms, right?

this phenotype morph shit is retarded as fuck anyways so I wouldn't be surprised if it was "real" but ok I trust you if you've seen the original

>this phenotype morph shit is retarded as fuck
Yes.
>so I wouldn't be surprised if it was "real"
The real ones are retarded but not that level of retarded. Again, look at Portugal. The person who has edited the pic put a literal sub saharan african there, it's an obvious edit.

And yes I've seen the original. In the original they used this pic instead.

wtf i love portugal now, i will take my wife an her son on a vacation there.

norwegian

Nope.

It's Portugal.

I don't know why Zig Forumsoids still take the site seriously when on their methodology page they openly admit that the images are mostly computer generated and edited, and not even meant to be representative of real people. And a fuckton of the sources they use for determining how they are made to look are literally just some 200 year old "studies" from Germany and France. I'm sure there are uses for it but not in the way everyone here seems to think.

I don't know how anyone could even fall for this stuff. It's not as if you could look at these images and go "yeah, that guy looks just like me!". What are the odds?

retardation

no the look is more north pontic, dinaric looks too much like gypsy

why is there a paki in norway?

I'm sure some people do look like the pics on that site, it's not like they pulled them 100% from thin air, but I get the feeling a lot of people don't realize effectively everyone is a mutt of different ones, so even if the pics were technically correct it would not mean shit. And of course with this kinda stuff there will always be heavy confirmation bias, especially if there's a specific one you *want* to look like