Has your country ever committed a war crime?
Has your country ever committed a war crime?
Other urls found in this thread:
No.
It's not a crime of there are no witnesses.
Plenty, during ww2 Australian high command really wanted to capture Japanese prisoners for interrogation but the Australian soldiers kept torturing them all to death, normally with fire it is where the
>hot nips
meme comes from.
There was nothing Command could do to stop it happening either, the men were angry after learning what Japanese were doing to prisoners so they refused to take prisoners
Yes
Navidad Negra
It was before war rules were something formal but even so people back then was pretty vocal against that
We fucked over indonesia a bunch. Other than that I don't know really
not a warcrime under the "start shit, get hit" convention :r)
Don't think so
There was a similar problem with the US just shooting Japanese prisoners on sight.
Naval Intelligence eventually figured out that if there was a reward of twenty gallons of ice cream for every POW, they'd stop doing it.
Yeah nah we legit tortured them, it is recorded as a war crime, Americans just shot them because they kept fighting thinking you were like us.
There is one account where aussie soldiers threw the japanese off cliffs after they surrendered too.
Remember America joined the pacific late in the war, nips were already producing propaganda about what we were doing and they figured Americans would do the same.
"War crime" is a relatively new term. There were times when the Polish Commonwealth was quite influencial and it then there were times when we were involved in great conflicts. During these conflicts some questionable acts happened, like on every side of every war that ever happened. In modern times Poland has mostly been irrelevant and it was usually our nation which suffered vict of war crimes. Some partisans and soldiers commited murderous acts, although it is difficult to judge these people now, without understanding full context - and remembering that there was a horrible war going on and everything was stained by death in one way or another. To sum up, I wouldn't really refer to Poland as a country that commited "actual" war crimes, at least no more than any other cunt which ever existed
>which was victim*
And in case sb was wondering the only thing I can think of is some crazy partisan killing off an entire village of ukrainans or something like that, thats the closest to a war crime that we did
no
what is wrong with women
Non I would know of.
has to be fake
know some pretty dumb girls but none of them would do this
No
Never. Especially not in the 20th century
Our SAS are fucking savage. One guy cut off the hand of an enemy combatant in Afghanistan because his evac was coming and he didn't have time to identify the body. When he got back to base he just dropped the hand on the ground. When the CO saw it and flipped out, all the SAS there were baffled as to what the problem was.
It is fake, the fucked up wheel is from a car forum.
No
Never. Mexico has always been the good guy in history.
If not the nice guy, at least the victim. We've never won a single war and our history is a heartbreaking compilation of buttrape after buttrape.
no since there's no laws in war
The only criminals were those that resisted us.
There is a country out there whose existence is solely nased on the fact that we wanted to genocide them
We would never do that :)
(dunno if this one would count but its pretty kino so fr.wikipedia.org
yes. and it was glorious.
We removed native children from their parent to put them in internment camp re-educating them and deported/ murdered acadian.
no
>tfw good guys of history
You missed the turkish proxy, imbecile.
No but i wish they do
he means bangladesh
>The sultan's army entered into the area of the impalements, which was seventeen stades long and seven stades wide. There were large stakes there on which, as it was said, about twenty thousand men, women, and children had been spitted, quite a sight for the Turks and the sultan himself.
>The sultan was seized with amazement and said that it was not possible to deprive of his country a man who had done such great deeds, who had such a diabolical understanding of how to govern his realm and its people. And he said that a man who had done such things was worth much.
>The rest of the Turks were dumbfounded when they saw the multitude of men on the stakes. There were infants too affixed to their mothers on the stakes, and birds had made their nests in their entrails.
Does this count?
No.