Well Zig Forums, who has the right?

Well Zig Forums, who has the right?

Attached: WHO.png (892x1267, 94.5K)

unironically, only the nations in europe with exception of turkey because theyre muslim and majority of their land is outside europe

and yes i also know that tatars are majority muslim, but theyre already a very small minority very well integrated into european society. id say theyre 50% EVROPEAN

Those are all linguistic terms and obviously don't define borders, so it's this

Group A should form an alliance.

Out of all these, only Finns and Hungarians. Georgians, Tatars and Turks are Eurasian. The others are obviously non-Europeans

if thats the case then only nation living in evro.

does anyone really wanna be scat-eating, wife-cuckolding, hand-farting dirty e*ropean? we use this term as a slander.

TΛTΛRS are TRANScontitental, our waaaaay fat and huge penises are too big to contain them within just one continent

Whoever's homelands are west of the Ural mountains and river, are European. Yes, even the Turkics, but just barely, and even then it's only because they're sandnigger Greeks

why would our language exclude us if we've been here since the beginning? brothers from another mother perhaps but still european

finland and hungary, georgia at a stretch
turkics are disqualified on principle and the rest aren't even in europe

Just because some random people in 5000 BCE moved from some unknown area in world to Asia dosent mean we are European.

Based ethnic chad

>because theyre muslim
So? Albania is Muslim too but it's still a part of Europe. Bosnia is majority Muslim but it sure as hell isn't a part of Asia or whatever.

Always leave it to the Pole to make the dumbest post imaginable. The argument about majority of their lands being outside of Europe is fine though.

None or them

Bosnians and Albanians are pretty white though. We can't say the same for Turks.

Non-meme answer: Finns and Hungarians

European is not a race.

Hungary is a gypsy shithole

SVVN...

Attached: 2025.png (3036x1712, 112.29K)

Hungarians are probably still the most similar group of people to north continental Croats
Most of those people were Slavs and part of the same groups as north Croats up until the start of the last millennium. We even shared the same country for most of that time.
Their huge gypsy population probably makes them more non-european than their Uralic language does.

>religion means you can't be X
What's the difference between Islam and Christianity? both originate form the Middle East, one just rants on about Jesus while the other rants on about Jesus not being the son of god but a prophet instead

Indo-Poos are not native to Europe. Only native Europeans are the Basques.

Not just language but Finns came from Uralic mountains which is on the edge of Europe and the start of Asia

Don't Indo-Poos originate from North Caucasus which is in East Europe?

in reality there were several waves of settlers from all different directions. We arent homogeneous

No country is homogeneous in the first place, maybe some tiny Island in the bum fuck middle of the Pacific or Oceania

Go back to your Kurgan.

Georgian Hungarians and fins can call themselves European

it isnt, but Europeanism is based on a very clear ethno-religious identity - white christians

Very convenient way for footnotes of history like Poles to claim the achievements of the Western civilization.

>footnotes
Hell, not even a footnote. More like comedic relief.