Why are norwegians so much swarthier compared to other nords?

why are norwegians so much swarthier compared to other nords?

Attached: _91408619_55df76d5-2245-41c1-8031-07a4da3f313f.jpg (976x850, 61.9K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=a2TVpq8lj6w
youtube.com/watch?v=Cpi2ooP7XiE
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

oil you dumb

arctic saudi arabia

viking mutt genes.
norwegians travelled to ireland where people used to look like negroids.
meanwhile swedes went to russia where people were blonde but mongoloid.
consequently, today's norwegians look mulatto, while swedes look hapa

We aren't. You need to cleanse your brain from Zig Forums memes

Seafood, particularly fish-based diets, affect melanin production. Norwegians also have considerable Celtic input, along with numerous Upper Palaeolithic racial remnants.
Swedes are more slanted due to mere borealization than direct Sami admixture. It's actually Finns who are not entirely West Eurasian, and the amount East Asian genetic contribution in Finns is rather negligible.

We are slightly swarthier because we have for over a millenia eaten more fish and drunk more cod liver oil than the rest. This gave us an increased protection against the negative side effect of various motion-mediating hormons such as dopamine. We have higher levels of this hormone, and slightly less of the genes that either supress the production or protect against it. We are because if this slightly swarthier, one two IQ points dumber than either sweds or finns. But, we have more genuises per capita and are less prone to schizoprenia and similar neurological diseases (enviorment, fish and cod liver). We have a higher share of children who from blond hair to black hair when they grow up

Smartpants cope

steppe goat herders. This is why Varg calls Arabs his brothers.

Attached: 3 (1).jpg (951x1291, 261.66K)

from what i've seen in genetic researches norge people are more celtic compared to other scandis

fish oil

Attached: 1538310899686.png (665x511, 52.83K)

Slightly more Celtic, but there's not much difference. Finns and Swedes are the most blondes. Faroe islanders are actually much darker, they have much more dark hair due to contact with the UK.

Faroese people and Icelanders are basically 50% Irish or something

Yeah, it's surprising how dark they are when you go there from Scandinavia.

Because they arent souless subhumans unlike others...

I think it's mostly climate, large parts of the country are overcast year round, like parts of Britain and Ireland.

Weren't the Swedes known for being unusually swarthy? Isn't that word, in fact associated with the classical Swedes?

youtube.com/watch?v=a2TVpq8lj6w

Attached: 1558919549868.jpg (2336x3504, 769.78K)

I'm not sure whether you're trolling or not, but no.

>fish oil

Probably this. Features are somewhat a result of environment, and almost all green-eyed people are central euro forest fucks..

Do niggers get whiter if they live for several generations without scorching sun or no?

Look at american blacks most of them are light brown or so but that is also probably because they got mixed so much

African americans on average are 20% whitoids

this is little known history and norwegian textbooks don't mention it either but in 1693-1738 over 30 thousands north and subsaharan africans were brought to several harbours along the norwegian west coast to work in the fishing industry due to lack of norwegian men since most of them were in the fleet. this means for most of the year, majority of men in those towns would've been african and that is why norwegians are swarthier today

Tom is a good lad
youtube.com/watch?v=Cpi2ooP7XiE

Attached: Some Swedes.jpg (3200x2310, 3.02M)

Rome occupied Britain for an era but we don't have southern European influence in our native DNA

>We are slightly swarthier because we have for over a millenia eaten more fish and drunk more cod liver oil than the rest. This gave us an increased protection against the negative side effect of various motion-mediating hormons such as dopamine. We have higher levels of this hormone, and slightly less of the genes that either supress the production or protect against it. We are because if this slightly swarthier, one two IQ points dumber than either sweds or finns. But, we have more genuises per capita and are less prone to schizoprenia and similar neurological diseases (enviorment, fish and cod liver). We have a higher share of children who from blond hair to black hair when they grow up

sounds like cope

Climate not diet influences complexion

Yeah it's as it has to do with vitamin D intake. Why do eskimos and siberians have darker complexion when they live even more north than scandinavians? Because their diet was rich in vitamin d no need for lighter skin

Bloody hell Ukko you should know in a land where there are months of sun and no night people adapt to suit their environment

>tfw 100% swedecuck
>extremely dark, almost raven black hair
>dark green/hazel eyes
>pale as a fucking corpse
>can't grow a beard, only a goatee and mustache

Mutt life here on Gotland.

Your epicanthic fold doesn't make you east Asian

so why polar bears are white and jungle bears are brown if they both eat fish? I think swarthiness has more to do with sun exposition over generations than diet