Who has the best claim to be roman descendant?

Unironically our king is descendent from the Holy Roman Empire and he is heir to the title because the Bizantine Empire declared our catholic kings as the heirs of the Bizantine Empire. So he has claim to both.

There are thousands of Roman ruins here faggot, so many they are even disregarded when new construction works emerge since its everywhere anyways.

You know the answer

Attached: tolQ9ih.png (1600x1954, 367.33K)

Obviously France. We are the only ones who had a European empire comparable to Rome in the modern age.

Attached: Europe_1812_map_en-2.png (2284x1503, 1.14M)

Romanians

>sauli khan of roman empire

Even on your map osmans fit better actually

I think Felipe VI has the best claim for Roman Emperor
but really, I don’t think there is a true heir. when the empire collapsed in the East to turk invaders, it ceased to be entirely. Without a continuous government, any attempt at recreating the Roman Empire today would be a Neo-Roman Empire
Unless, do you mean genetically? That would definitely be the people who fit in the ‘Iron Age and Roman Republic’ box

and Italians are mixed with every barbarian tribe of earth

The Roma of course

Attached: γύφτος.jpg (1280x1024, 148.05K)

They never owned Rome unlike us

>Who has the best claim to be roman descendant?
Wales

>pic related

>Although the Welsh language and its ancestors have been spoken in what is now Wales since well before the Roman incursions into Britain, historian John Davies argues that the origin of the "Welsh nation" can be traced to the late 4th and early 5th centuries, following the end of Roman rule in Britain.

>The names "Wales" and "Welsh" are modern descendants of the Anglo-Saxon word wealh, a descendant of the Proto-Germanic word "Walhaz", which was derived from the name of the Gaulish people known to the Romans as Volcae and which came to refer indiscriminately to inhabitants of the Western Roman Empire. The Old English-speaking Anglo-Saxons came to use the term to refer to the Britons in particular. As the Britons' territories shrank, the term came ultimately to be applied to a smaller group of people, and the plural form of Wealh, Wēalas, evolved into the name for the territory that best maintained cultural continuity with Roman/pre-Anglo-Saxon Britain: Wales. The modern names for various Romance-speaking people in Continental Europe (e.g. Wallonia, Wallachia, Valais, Vlachs, and Włochy, the Polish name for Italy) have a similar etymology.

>Although the Welsh language was certainly used at the time, Gwyn A. Williams argues that even at the time of the building of Offa's Dyke, the people to its west saw themselves as Roman, citing the number of Latin inscriptions still being made into the 8th century.

Attached: 20201122_104154.jpg (1078x2020, 415.5K)

DAS RITE, WE WUZ

Italians.
>This article is about the medieval Roman Empire
so not Greek? Gotcha.

>Romans
>1 ethnicity
i shiggy diggy

Attached: 1596469396994.png (1520x1064, 308.27K)

There’s no common “Roman” descendent. They had a Northern European ruling class that shaped their culture, just as the Mycenaeans did when they were conquered by IE chieftains.

Oh god, here come the varg phenomemes wuzzing

This

Not Italy.

Shut up France

>They had a Northern European ruling class that shaped their culture,
YEA WE WUZ SNOW KANGZ N SHIEET

based, now take back southern italy