Americans and their cultural vassals (esp Brits) think napoleon was defeated at waterloo

>americans and their cultural vassals (esp Brits) think napoleon was defeated at waterloo
>They don't know he was actually defeated at the battle of leipzig

Attached: napoleon-i-9420291-2-402.jpg (1200x1200, 246.4K)

>Turks were stopped by Austrians and not actually Poles as media has led me to believe

>Napoleon was stopped by Prussians and not Brits as media has led me to believe

Attached: mmphpm thinking.jpg (559x613, 80.56K)

>People think Napoleon was ethnically French and not some Italian guy who moved there to have a good career.

Attached: h0i97baon5551.jpg (904x864, 83.77K)

Napoleon was stopped by a coalition of Russians, Austrians, Prussians, other Germans, Brits, Spaniards, Swedes. Our only steadfast allies were the Poles and Denmark-Norway.

>italians
>capable in warfare
narrative destroyed

Germanoid cope.

Brits had nothing to do with stopping Napolean. They only dogpiled on at the end, desperate to try and claim credit for what Europe did.

There's that classic british inferiority complex to their continual rivals.

There is a reason you were cucked out of the affairs of the white man in europe and forced to bully thirdies.

He was defeated in both though?

Its undeniably true though, the Cent-Jours were only the last spasms of a dead empire.

Earlier defeat takes precedence.

Prussia, Austria, Sweden, Russia and various other German states are responsible for the downfall of Napolean.

I mean if you look at the numbers alone, it's true that Waterloo was a skirmish compared to Leipzig and Russia. It certainly isn't the same thing when the French Emperor is fighting with an army of 16 year-old conscripts.

Shit phone. Continental*

They've always been superior to you though.

>Brits had nothing to do with stopping Napolean
I hate England as much as the next guy, but you can't just downplay this handsome motherfucker's victories like that.

Attached: HoratioNelson1.jpg (2074x2500, 1.98M)

How do you like France? Was it difficult for you when you moved there?

To be fair Trafalgar wasn't an attempt to invade Britain, Napoleon had given up on the idea when the War of the Third Coalition broke out. It certainly ensured Britain's supremacy on the seas though.

not only Napoleon was primarily destroyed during the Russian campaign but Russian army also had the largest presence during the battle of Leipzig and siege of Paris, as well as the largest impact on both

>people subscribe to muh ethnicity meme

True but you would've lost if you had fought us head on like men. Unfortunately Russians were so scared at the sight of the Grande Armée that they decided to fight an attrition war.

Invading Russia was just a dumb move

No it was doable but Napoleon fucked it up. He had several occasions where he could've sat on his gains and reorganise but he wanted to go for a complete victory.

Napoleon lost because he sperged out and invaded his ally Spain, guerrillas alone killed more French soldiers than Waterloo and Leipzig combined

>our

Napoleon was an usurper and France was his victim just like any other country. That's why France wasn't actually punished during the Congress of Vienna.

that was the logical thing to do after Russia acquired a strategic victory in the battle of Borodino but lost tactically

>guerillas alone
Guerillas didn't kill that many people, hunger and disease did.

Attached: 5435763547.jpg (1333x431, 69.19K)

France wasn't punished too harshly because Metternich wanted to keep the balance of power, and Talleyrand used some of his magic to gain a spot at the negotiating table.
You can't call France a victim when the wars had begun long before Napoleon took power. Napoleon was just the hero of Toulon when Pichegru completed his conquest of the Low Countries. Not to mention that the population was stupidly loyal to him, and all of his officers and administrators admired him blindly. Caesar was an usurper too, Napoleon was of the same ilk.

The poles were more like a vassal state than proper allies.
You even forced them to buy prussian bonds because you knew they were useless

imagine if russians / poles were speaking french today

Attached: duplicate file.png (250x228, 61.26K)

Napoleon is underrated

They were allies insofar as all of the Poles who served in the French army did so of their own volition because they believed Napoleon was the man who would restore their country. Polish aid was fully conditional, but it was a good trade desu, Polish troops were heroic.

France wasnt punished because the monarchies of Europe were trying to restore the old nobility/monarchy, which happened to be related by blood to all of Europe.
Just like Germany after WWII with the financial families that financed Hitler. You know, most of them still exist today and still enjoy massive wealth and prestige

have sex incels, y'all stuck in da past y'all need to be lookan for the future no wonder y'all always so bitter KSKSKSKSKSKSKSKSKS

french replacing p*lish would be kino
Russian, it being a Real Language, not so much.

What's wrong with liking history? I regularly read books about the Revolutionary and Napoleonic period, it's fascinating.

Unlikely even if the french had won.
Yes, just like some ukrainians fought for Germany in WWII

True, he was a Corsican nationalist above everything else