Born

>born
>too late to explore the world
>too early to explore space

Attached: Cc6w.gif (450x258, 983.63K)

then explore the oceans you idiot

Sea voyaging sucked ass during the age of exploration, I doubt anyone on this site would have the stomach for it.

>born
>too lazy to do anything

This, imagine being stuck on a ship with other smelly retards for months (years if you account for the entire journey + whatever your goal is) while eating weevil infested hardtack and losing your teeth to scurvy.

if you have money you can do anything

>born

Attached: 1557840814929.png (600x519, 164.68K)

We need a Henry Ford but instead of cars it's rocket ships

with current energy understanding, no
we need to discover new materials capable to storing massive amount of energy

just in time to purchase research chemicals off the internet and explore the mind :^)

Space exploration will be mostly done by robots and grounded technicians.

The people who do go out there, the austronauts, have to be in peak physical and intelectual form (do you work out and study regularly?) and need very high tolerance for boredom since outer space is mostly less stimulant than your regular, daily life (this thread suggests you are easilly bored).

>boredom
>can look out the window anytime

Attached: 1604893308106.jpg (340x296, 36.99K)

no, for a technical nation like china maybe
for a country that can use space to make tourist money, no, don't worry we will all get a chance in space

Better off than people born 20 years before us. Lmao, imagine having to grow up in the 80's

what this user said

Those materials already exist, you can use uranium and plutonium dirty thrusters in outer space because when there is nobody behind you to poison.

For just living around the sun, you have more solar power than you'll ever need (unless you plan to live for over 8 billion years) and there are no nights or cloudy days.

Course fusion would be more convenient for leaving the solar system, since those heavy elements you can use for fission are much, murch scarce compared to light elements used for fusion.

This, do as Jacques Cousteau and don't be a pussy

no, more efficient materials, those things cannot push anything out of the atmosphere

What do you think you can see out of your window? You don't see anything but what you could see on a clear night sky down here.

Not really "exploration", is it? It's like the difference between going to the zoo and exploring a jungle or savannah - except the zoo will have more distinct attractions for a non-scientist than outer space or Mars would.

Just in time to explore femboy bussy as it becomes a widely available resource

you can't see the earth out of the spacecraft window?

depends, on the type of mission, exploration in near objects, sure, but with far objects it's better to send disposable people

>He didn't stow away a twink in the brig before he set off from Genoa.

Attached: 184uyp31qtl51.jpg (3023x3737, 1.22M)

Go sit on a rusty nail faggot

There's still a lot to explore bro

Attached: 1589711019464.jpg (924x928, 66.92K)

just in time to explore your bumhole

> he thinks we will explore space
You idiot. That’s a scam. Lol.

I'd be up for it just for the sex on board and with the natives (men)

Ah, you just meant launches.

I'm partial to mass drivers. We could maybe build some in Kilimanjaro?

Orbital rings if those are possible.

Launching things from Earth will never be as economical as launching from lower gravity or thinner atmospheres, though. It makes more since to get robots and engineers on the Moon and send instructions to them from Earth if stuff like mass drivers and orbital rings aren't practical.

Oh, sure, if you are just planning to hand out in Earth's backyard. But I have to imagine it would get boring. Satellites we can use from Earth do a way better job than your naked eyes do, we can even do 3d projections of Earth's surface. It'll just become a dot if you actually get to somewhere worth landing in, besides the Moon. Earth won't be much more visible from Mars than Mars is visible from Earth.

>send disposable
Even if you didn't value human lives, those humans would need to have important functions to justify the cost of sending them off and the supplies and systems required to keep them alive. If you have to send humans you want to send ones that are less likely to fuck up the mission. If they don't improve the chances of the mission succeeding, you don't send them.

>implying macacaos can ever into space

I relate man, should of been born 500 years ago