Can the Brazil numbers be right?

They don't shave, they wax using bee wax. That's where the Brazilian wax came from.

Yes, brazilians are mulatoes.

VGH....LARPAMERICA

Sounds about right, unlike latin america we mostly live very far away from the jungle.

We never had a big native population to begin with, most of the natives here were refugees from the Incas, to the point that our name in Tupi is Pindorama, which means "Paradise of Palmtrees", a legend that the natives believe that they would reach a holy land far away from troubles by moving west of the Inca Empire.

Attached: images-2.jpg (554x554, 36.87K)

*moving east

45% of Brazil is classified as Pardo's, they only consider black people if they are fully black whereas in the USA you could be 1/2 black or even 1/4 black and still considered black. There is a Brazilian who always makes a thread confused as to why Kamala Harris is seen as black here

Yes, fuck black and white nationalists, the only true nationalist is the brazilian nationalist

Attached: flag_bearer_kuruminha_by_commissargabe_dcksbuu-pre.png (761x1050, 377.84K)

some tribes do it with piranha teeth, other do it with some sort of leaf that cuts, others do with beeswax. it varies
it happened so long most aren't even aware they have injun blood. seeing as how straight hair can be attributed to euros, or that thick lips and flat nose to blacks, they just go with what's recent.
there was a practice in some tupi tribes called cunhadismo (brother-in-lawism) and by marrying an injun a portuguese would be part of the tribe so most of them were assimilated so long people aren't aware

Baseado

that depends on what the word indigenous means to this map. I it's exclusively about the people who still lives in tribes then it's accurate, but if it means "race" then it's not, as there are still a lots of people who have majority amerindian blood, specially in the amazon region
perigosamente baseado

Not even Obama is black. Cope.

THICK

Actually, no. We have a lot more amerindians, but only amerindians living in tribes usually self-identify as indigenous.

>paraguay
>2%
they literally speak an indigenous language

Attached: 1584899502297.jpg (4000x3000, 1.34M)

This is false. There are native communities in every single state, they just might be invisible to the average person. Also note they don't always wear ceremonial clothing and painting.

This is also false. Their numbers are currently estimated to have been in the tens of millions by 1500. There are also enough archeological discoveries to conclude that there were already many here before the Inca empire even existed as an entity.

This is changing. The reality is that pardos with clear black features also face racism just as full on blacks do, which means they are starting to classify black-looking pardos and full blacks (pretos) together as negros.

Being indigenous here does not have to do with genetics, but with culture. Someone might be 100% native genetically but if they're assimilated into society and don't actively belong to a indigenous group (they reject the term tribe) they're not considered indigenous.

dunno, but Paraguay and Argentina are prolly wrong

It's shit, raise it to at least 15%. Also raise all others on that image to at least 30%

The only study I've seen about this tens of millions was the one from IBGE to be quite frank, which was an estimate.

If anything the only archealogical discoveries that I can thing of are the ones from the Amazon and from Marajoara, both that date before the europeans reaching here, and by the writings of the jesuits and the portuguese you can see that their numbers were not really that great, at least by the coast.

We genocided them
An inclusive we, you were in it

Dunno if it happens in other countries in the continent but like half of the self-identifying indigenous people here are actually mestizo larping since indian reservations enjoy a special status and get a lot of benefits from the state, so self-recognition has become a huge incentive for them.

Like half of that 3.4% indigenous people here are 40% euro at least. Actual unmixed indigenous can be found in the uncontacted tribes of the amazon, and few as well in most reservations, but overall actual fully indigenous people are probably less than 1 or 1.5% of the population

youtube.com/watch?v=_HzNN_sGGmc

>This is changing
I highly doubt that the people outside big cities like SP and RJ and maybe other capitals will get aboard on this black nationalism/racism bullshit. If anything, just like the "Amazon is international land" propaganda is playing right into Bolsonaro's agenda of an external enemy

VVVVVVVVVVVGGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHH

Attached: 1600780166788.png (900x860, 489.77K)

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tupi_language
>When the Portuguese Prime Minister Marquis of Pombal expelled the Jesuits from Brazil in 1759, the language started to wane fast, as few Brazilians were literate in it. Besides, a new rush of Portuguese immigration had been taking place since the early 18th century, due to the discovery of gold, diamonds, and gems in the interior of Brazil; these new colonists spoke only their mother tongue. Old Tupi survived as a spoken language (used by Europeans and Indian populations alike) only in isolated inland areas, far from the major urban centres.
Marquês do Pombal fá-lo outra vez

Attached: língua tupi.png (752x1184, 847.82K)

Thank god it still is alive in the Amazon

A única coisa boa que esse verme fez

It wildly depends on how the study was made and where they did it. If they only asked people in the capitals/major cities of countries, it is most likely pretty correct for Argie, Paraguay and Brazil, given most indigenous people are rural/far from the cities.

same shit happen here