How fucked could someone get if

how fucked could someone get if they're 18 years old and there's only text message evidence of them "sexting" a minor? by text message evidence I mean no images, just text messages containing sexual language.

Attached: 1600447350109.png (917x1551, 249.88K)

Other urls found in this thread:

timminspress.com/2013/05/29/30-days-for-online-bullying/wcm/5842baa6-7376-5976-0118-c1896591cc6d
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

kill yourself pedo faggot, tell me where you live I won't "if" you, I'm gonna give you the prison treatment

define "if"

you dun goofed

Depends, what state and how old is the minor

before you faggots kill me ive been watching a hsit ton of to catch a predator unironicalyl recently and I've been thinking about how retarded the people on the show are. then I started wondering the process of how they catch people. no other board is capable of discussion anymore hence I'm here

lets say its across states/entriely online. age I don't really think matters, more just the fact that there's a technically legal adult with someone who's under 18 talking sexually.

It matters what state the 18 year old is in legally and the age of the minor matters too because many states have laws protecting young adults doing this sort of thing with minors only a few years younger than the adult.

yeah i know about the "romeo juliet law" but as far as I can see that's just about in person relatinships.

It's equivalent. But regardless, if you're purely interested in how texting about doing something differs from actually doing something, as far as I know the texts can be treated as a confession/admission of guilt as long as they came from the phone owned by the adult. The adult would have to prove that either they weren't in possession of their phone at the time/thought they were texting someone else, which probably would not be easy.

look up underage sextortion scams

Pedos belong in jail with untamed BBC. Kill yourself pedofag

also from article: "Nevers threatened to “ruin her reputation” by posting their private messages if she didn’t send him the photos he demanded."

yeah this guy deserved to be fucked over. in my mind I was thinking of it was "consensual" between the two people.

also in article:
"Nevers’ defence lawyer, Ted Tichinoff, said his client does not fit the category of an online predator.

He portrayed the victim and the accused as a pair of sexually curious teenagers, noting Nevers was age 19 at the time.

The prosecutor took exception to this portrayal.

“This was not innocent experimentation by any stretch,” O’Hanley said.

The fact Nevers repeatedly threatened and tried to coerce the victim into sending him nude photos of herself “takes us out of the usual case” of sexually curious teens, O’Hanley said."

>land of the free

Even without the blackmail, he would have still been convicted of "Invitation to Sexual Touching", which is a crime (in Canada).

>"Invitation to Sexual Touching
makes sense. doesn't look like that holds up in the States? i see nothing about it aside from Canadian related shit

In Canada. He got a six-figure job after that.

It entirely deepends on your local law and the age gape. Here in germany for example its not even a problem to get soft nudes of 16-18 year olds, if you dont harass them.

You're fucked if it's sexts. Something about digital crimes fall under federal law, also pornographic crimes and such. Even if you could legally date an underage girl through Romeo and Juliet you couldn't send sexts or nudes, that would be illegal. So you're probably fucked, sorry man.

why dont you just gtfo back to /b and kys nigger

Attached: usrspepe.png (246x251, 86.06K)

>land of the free

Is she 16 or older? You're fine realistically. Is the younger? You could get fucked pretty bad.