Game features conflict

>game features conflict
>empire bad
>rebels also bad

Kaiser Friedrich groomed him as his successor via rebellion since the Goldenbaum dynasty was a joke at that point

Look at the subs in his cap, he's shitting on games that do the awful "Rebels Good Empire Bad" trope.
Empire Good Rebels Bad is objectively the best way.

>The Chad virgin
>The virgin Chad
Which one is Yang and which one is Reinhard?

Yang was The Virgin Virgin that died a virgin cuck achieving literally nothing.
Reinhard was The Chad Chad that scored prime royal pussy, achieved every single one of his goals, conquered the galaxy, cleaned out the filth and established new much needed reforms.

There's never been a good just rebellion.

He's still a rebel for overthrowing the Goldenbaum dynasty and establishing a new order. Not to mention his reforms and him wiping out most of the nobility.

Reinhard is literally a virgin for 90% of the series so he's the chad virgin

He's still an imperialist, or are you going to say that Augustus Caesar wasn't an imperialist just because he "started out as a rebel, overthrew the Triumvirate and established new order, not to mention his reforms and wiping out most of the senate"?

Name 1 (uno) game where Empire or an empire-esque faction are the good guys.

Attached: 9478461_m.jpg (425x600, 79.27K)

Trails of Cold Steel

This is called usurpator.

>we live in a republic and not an empire
>not an empire
>empire
The US is an empire. It's the whole angloshphere, from japan to new zealand. This is one of the reasons why the empire is always bad in media.

Any wh40 based game.

>or are you going to say that Augustus Caesar wasn't an imperialist just because he "started out as a rebel, overthrew the Triumvirate and established new order, not to mention his reforms and wiping out most of the senate"?
That's not at all what happened though.

I guess Wh FB based games also count.

Only because you play as the empire, in Sky and Zero/Ao they are the bad.

The Elder Scrolls.

Are you going to say Napoleon wasn't a rebel because he established an empire ?

What I'm trying to say is rebels become the establishment, and are then overthrown by other rebels. Simple as that. We live in a democracy now so anyone trying to establish an autocratic regime, like Hitler for example, would start out as a rebel.

Technically, no, since a usurpator would claim the throne of an already existing dynasty.

That has little to do with OP. Lohengramm is very much for the empire and caused a change of leadership personnel because the current nobles had become inept and decadent.

>a person who takes the power of a country, city, or established region for themselves, without any formal or legal right to claim it as their own

alright someone tell me which fucking rip of this shit is the one to get. There's a dozen of them across the internet and every single one is filled with people SWEARING it's inferior to another. I finally have the time to delve into /m/ and I just finished patlabor and about 4 different gundam series.

haha i need to watch gundam

Waga Ferdinand von Aegir.

>there are distinct good guys and bad guys
Video games, everyone.

LoGH is not even close to mecha, it's a political drama with line battle-esque space battles thrown in occasionally

>That's not at all what happened though.
It's precisely what happened though, nobody took Octavian seriously because he was Julius' nephew and he was a puppet figurehead on paper with his generals ruling in his stead while he was still too young to rule properly as part of triumvirate, with Mark Anthony and Pompey effectively ruling between themselves.
Then Octavian grew up, gathered enough of old supporters of his uncle and started carving out his path as a "rebel". Rest of the points I don't even need to address since they're exactly what happened.