It’s a reskin of assassin’s creed odyssey, you’ll still play with both genders...

>specifically delayed multiple games because of criticism directed at Ghost Recon Breakpoint and Division 2 for being too reliant on the tired Ubisoft formula
>they changed nothing and it's still the same old shit

Attached: 5789015175.jpg (615x456, 41.91K)

Templars are enemies in AssCreed because they don't value their free will, retard. They already give in their free will by believing that The Father of Understanding is the true source of guidance and anybody who think otherwise is an irredeemable traitor to their order.

Pretty much everybody else outside that order are debatable whether they are really innocents or not. That's why the Assassin's brotherhood made tenets for it.

They put all the delayed years of effort into a new formula that they can reuse. The Origins style just replaced the original mechanics and we’ll get a decade of this instead. There were 10 games in the older style, we’ll get 7 more in this style.

Gee, I'm sure all those anglo-saxon soldiers you'll have to mow down en masse are templars.

That's why I said debatable in the beginning but hey, fuck Ubisoft for ruining that narrative.

oh if there is a choice i am definitely killing the woman and children just to be on the historically accurate side of things

ill be happy with this feature

actually they should include the rape and pillage village feature

be so much fun!

AC vs Templar is basically Law vs Chaos
they kinda have those narrative that not all templar are bad or all assassins are good with unity and rogue

but ubisoft think simple alignment is too hard for normie to understand
so ass = good Templar = bad

Because this is ass creed where history isn't what it seems.

no, see this post If it's really about what you just said, then the Templars will never have to be fixated on their needs for the Pieces of Eden to implement their Laws. Instead, they'd use anything else like any normal human beings to implement the Laws, just like in real life.

That shit works so until it isn't Ubisoft will still kicking the dead horse.

How do you know this

didnt they already say no ship battles and no RPG elements?

Why was this guy fired? The official story is so nonsensical.

pcgamer.com/ubisoft-delays-watch-dogs-legion-rainbow-six-quarantine-and-gods-and-monsters/

I hope there are ship battles. They're fun as hell.

did you even read the article? they said breakpoint was too rushed (and everyone knew it) so they didnt want to rush anything else

*ahem*

Attached: 1588344876292.jpg (525x762, 72.88K)

Because vikings are the current fad.
The historical part of Assassins Creed games is pretty much made by 13 year olds who have read a few wikipedia pages.
It's just so low effort.

Yeah, the guy was fired and I agree the story he made is nonsensical, but atleast he kept up the spirit of linear storytelling in Assassin's Creed.
Now the franchise is ruined by the conformist retards who like to sabotage the storyline to conform themselves, which was started to happen in AC Odyssey, and will happen again in AC Valhalla.

Did you read it?

>Guillemot said Breakpoint stumbled for three main reasons: Interest in sequels to live multiplayer games is limited; "gameplay innovations" in Breakpoint were not "perfectly implemented"; and it "did not come in with enough differentiation factors, which prevented the game’s intrinsic qualities from standing out."
What do you think "did not come with enough differentiation factors means?