Be honest, you never watched her videos, but just hopped on the hate bandwagon. What arguments have you against the points raised in this video?
youtube.com
Be honest, you never watched her videos, but just hopped on the hate bandwagon...
Other urls found in this thread:
youtu.be
m.youtube.com
twitter.com
Are you really so fucking bored today you just watched an old Anita video and made a thread about it on Zig Forums just to create yet another flamewar.
all of my arguments are summed up nicely in this video
youtu.be
Shut it retard
Sure, why not. Brings up memories of the good old times, eh?
No, I just hate women
Her thoughts and criticism are more well thought out and nuanced than 99.99% of the people harping on her. Al thought Zig Forums, being the eternal contrarians that they are, are probably starting to warm up her now.
>all fat and ugly
what a surprise
lol at those two employees who worked for over a year for free because Anita was broke and couldn't pay them despite flying all over the world and tweeting about the bad service she got at resteraunts
I am not giving her ad revenue. I also know it's a waste of time, man hating feminism is a detriment to society if not the biggest.
Does she do femdom videos?
The video is not monetized.
>goobergate
>good old times
reevaluate your life
shut up bitch
I think her videos are far too negative. Her research is not good enough and it's the most entry-level form of feminism out there. In fact the idea that her videos are shown in American collages is terrifying, not because of the SJW boogeyman, but because they seem like early highshcool essays. I know American education is a fucking joke, but it seems it's even worse than I thought.
But she's not 100% wrong all the time and she's not half the "feminazi" Zig Forums wants you to believe she is. She's talked about the negative impact of the tropes for men, as well, and there's some decent points in there.
The most interesting thing about her is not her videos or her work, but the reaction that her trying to make them has garnered. Her videos did not convince me there's sexism in the industry, but her attempt to make them did prove there's a lot of sexism in the player base.
american educated mongoloids.
if either of you had an IQ above 100 or had gone to a decent school, or any kind of real university, you'd realize her "analysis" would get her laughed out of a freshman communication's class
it isn't that she's "wrong" its that none of her critiques are remotely new, or interesting, or presented in a remotely sophisticated way.
t. smarter than any of you with an actual education
I’ve made plenty of videos responding to her, actually:
m.youtube.com
Woman are stupid. I would know, I've been married for close to 14 years.
>astroturfing to get more views on your videos
Cringe.
based
he ended up getting banned aswell lmao
>you never watched her videos, but just hopped on the hate bandwagon
I mean, she has outspoken disapproval of my gender, sexual preferences, and skin color. I don't have to watch the vids to not like her.
Actually that's not true, I watched a video of hers and it was about a Hitman game, and she claimed that the game rewards you for killing some random strippers. I realised that her criticism isn't really aimed at people who actually play video games, so I stopped watching.
I did watch a few back in the day. They were just shit.
I watched a few of her videos years ago. I agreed with some of her points, but I couldn't shake the feeling that some of her conclusions were being repeated verbatim from her sources. It was something about arbitrarily gender marketed toys (e.g. "Lego is for boys").
I had to stop watching because of her editing style, rather than anything political, but I don't remember what got under my skin.
How does that disprove the fact that most of the people giving her flak are even bigger retards?
>furfag
opinion discarded, i'd prefer retarded feminists than you, subhuman
Thoughtful response. Thanks.
I like her stubby legs.
>it isn't that she's "wrong" its that none of her critiques are remotely new, or interesting, or presented in a remotely sophisticated way.
so the reaction to her videos was overblown and every single person who decided to become a staunch republican because she made them is in fact an imbecile?
>mario saves peach because women bad
>not because it's the easiest story possible to understand and has been told in every single culture
This. Saying stuff like “Bayonetta was a single mother” makes her seem like someone willing to just make things up about a game to suit her narrative, at which point, I can’t trust anything she says.
Yes.
>outspoken disapproval
If she's so outspoken about it how come you don't have a single source where she says she disapproves of straight while male autists?
The negative reaction was born from the undeserved positive one. In that sense it was completely deserved. In fact she made off like a bandit with money, connections and job prospects so the negative reaction should have been larger.
the point is she's basically a con artist, she used her victimhood to make a bunch of money based on the promise that she'd produce some content worth a damn, and instead she produced a lazy pile of sophomoric bullshit
people are right to criticize her, her "critiques" if you can even call them that don't have to be wrong for her to be a morally bankrupt retard
That's the point, idiot. It's supposed to be feminism 101. But clearly even then she way overestimated gamers.
my argument is I still want to facefuck this ho
I must say that your video isn't very well structured and its kind of nitpicky, as in just choosing which Anita's points you counter, instead of getting the whole point Anita is trying to make. Thanks for the effort though.
The reaction to the videos themselves? Or the reaction to the people blindingly defending said videos without ackowledging how much objectively incorrect information she bases her points on? Of course when you tell someone they’re not allowed to dislike something, they’re gonna dislike it even more; that’s simply how the human mind works.
even if sexism exists, there's nothing wrong with sexism and fucking video games don't matter
Yeah man, I agree, hating feminism is so dumb
Not even gonna try, even views give things relevance. I also know her brand of feminism is objectively harmful to society. I am not writing a college paper here but let's just say society is like a battle and morale plays an important factor. Her views make things hopeless for men and lower their productivity, they also discourage people from having children which are vital. In the perfect social women have some rights to prevent men for being complacent, but not have their heads wrapped against good working family men for a hollow life of wine and social media focused travel. On the entertainment level things are better when the audience gender is separated like back in the 80s/90s, video games are for men and sexy female characters are entertaining which lowers stress.
her videos are feminism 101 like naruto is intro to japanese history, mong
Stop advertising.
Let's face it, you didn't watch her video and you didn't "realise" anything, you were told what to think by Zig Forums.
Is pic related a fucking joke to her?
Everybody who does this cartoon version of theirselves crap always slim them down.
The positive reaction was born from the undeserved negative one. You guys came first.
What's Petit up to these days? Still homeless thanks to Anita memeing him into working for free?
Can you argue in good faith for a second and acknowledge that she's probably referring to the reboot?
>n-no you’re lying
That all you got, kid?
Thanks for the reply. If you hadn't watched them yourself, how do you know her material is harmful to the society? Are you basing that on something someone else told you?
>You guys came first
No. Stop trying to change history. Zig Forums doesn't give a shit about irrelevant garbage. If it ended up here it was something Zig Forums liked or something other people liked. Either way we'll shit on it.