Are there any PC games that look as good as this?

>the screen shot u posted
You type like a fucking toddler.

Attached: lightning.webm (960x540, 2.87M)

>look as good as this

When you say "good", do you mean art style? Surely you do not mean quality of graphics. Your screenshot is full of severe blurring and low-res textures. There are multitudes of games for the pc with far, far better graphic quality than what is seen in your screenshot.

yeah well it looks like 60fps when ur in the lounge feels smooth, i dont know how to run fraps on console

what the fuck is wrong with PC gaming are there any decent games with good graphics on here?

what a lazy bait

Here you go, this looks better

Attached: 20160805231154_1.jpg (2716x1528, 1.35M)

what mentally ill webm is this? the graphics look like shit but the lightning is okay lmao

>Hunt: Showdown
>Call of the Wild
>any multiplat
Console market is far bigger which is why consoles get priority. Consolefags also have lower standards and don't care much for good performance. If the game looks pretty enough they'll play it.
Making games for consolenormies is just much easier and less effort since all they need to do is set up a good marketing strategy to sell their game. You just lie and fool people into thinking your shit is the best and most high-tech.
Apple pulls the same shit even though their products are overpriced paperweights but they can pull it off because they're such an established brand.
The lowest common denominator will always fall for your bullshit.

Attached: consolecucks.jpg (2000x2470, 1.4M)

this looks like an early xbox 360 game running on 1440p

Man, these games still look so good today. It's amazing what good lighting will do for you.

It''s literally a 2003 game.

Attached: xr_3da 2020-04-06 21-47-58-84.jpg (2560x1440, 1.49M)

Is this supposed to look better than op's pic?

>supposed to

It does because of dull dynamic lighting on dozens of light sources and shadows on each object.
No shitty gay tricks that break depending on viewing angle or distance.

Attached: xr_3da 2020-04-12 21-45-17-94.jpg (2560x1440, 1.39M)

op's pic have volumetric lightning and fog.
Otherwise there isn't much difference

>this is what considered to be good looking for PCockslaves
lmao

Stalkerfags are a mental case, they think if they spend hours after hours modding the yuro jankfest they don't even actually play it will eventually be good, at least Skyrimfags only use it for the porn and don't indulge into this kind of autism.

This right here

>consoletrannys can't even compete against an alpha build of a 2003 game

Somebody got filtered at the bridge patrol.

The game doesn't look like that. Watch any review they go over the same scene and it looks worse. Stop jerking to graphics and focus more on the gameplay.

>blurry Sony static cinematic worlds
>impressive
It looks good, sure, but nothing to really brag about.

You apparently missed kingdom come

I guess he'll permanently visit the cloud district

When this game comes to PC in the end of the year, yes.

It really doesn't, that shit looks fucking ancient and doesn't come close in any capacity.

Attached: got15.webm (960x540, 1.65M)

I am so glad you made this thread OP.
Now the game will come to PC in a year or so.
Those are cursed words you spoken uttered by Horizon and Red Dead Redemption fans and now we have those on PC. Its an eldritch invocation that strips the game of its exclusivity.

Attached: 1590699191574.jpg (1000x667, 179.92K)

>posting e3 bullshot

Attached: c8e2c45c6322382d0592b265f737b770.jpg (1913x928, 865.29K)

>can see the pathetic shadow LOD jump even in the bullshot

amazing

stalker came out in 2007

Sony sect Is the ultimate "muh incredible graphics" memesters.

Attached: 1448569243_2.jpg (1024x576, 121.51K)

>Are there any PC games that look as good as this?
youtube.com/watch?v=TYqJALPVn0Y

Attached: 3461b6ec1d7682ecc8df3f01d4ba7ae2.jpg (1918x879, 848K)

This is the 2002-2003 obilvion lost build.

Agreed. I like stalker but I see a lot of the fanbase is extremely autistic

can you play it? nope!
:3