>it's 2020
>Best looking game currently is running on 7 year old hardware
Are pc developers braindead or is playstation superior?
>it's 2020
>Best looking game currently is running on 7 year old hardware
Are pc developers braindead or is playstation superior?
it runs at like 23 fps lol
The loading times are also nearly instantaneous even on a base PS4 with HDD. It turns out optimization isn’t simply a meme.
RDR2 still dabbing on new games I see
good, i dont want to keep spending 1000$ every 6 months on a fucking PC im poor
Dude thats a screen from a teaser traile rof almost two years ago. Actual game graphics do not look like that at all.
Still, a very enjoyable game, why is literally everyone obsessed with graphics these days?
gameplay>graphics
this game is just a rinse and repeat for most of the quests.
30 fps
Having played both, I can tell you that there are far more details and impressive graphics in ghost of tsushima. rdr2 is a close second
It runs at 30fps not even 4K.
Can't wait for the PC port next year.
Cool lie bro
>this game is just a rinse and repeat for most of the quests
??? are you even playing the same game as me. the quests in the game are very different from eachother
Even Witcher 3 or Skyrim with all the mods PCtards can find still doesn't look as good as this game.
ghost of tsushima has better lightning and shadows and more detailed characters and objects in the world. the only thing rdr2 has on ghost of tsushima is better textures, atleast for the pc version, never played rdr2 on console
>I can tell you that there are far more details and impressive graphics in ghost of tsushima
Let's see them user.
what kind of a shitty comparison is this
It’s a whole lot easier when you only have to optimize the game for one, maybe two, hardware combinations.
That is utter horseshit, user.
>murky
>shit framerate
it would run in real 4k@ 60 fps with much better fidelity of everything on high end PC
and RDR2 on PS4 is a turd, PC quality is several orders better
TLoU2 looks the best.
>best looking game
>that blurryand poor renderized stone
oh yeah snoy very good looking
but its going to run on ps5 with 4k 60fps with the same graphics
Batman: Arkham Knight looks better than this, and it had a shit PC port and was made in Unreal Engine 3.
Just like Spider-Man? The performance mode on PS4 Pro has GoT capped at 30fps. If it's ported to PS5, it'll have some raytracing features (not real raytracing), and will be 30fps maximum.
>it's 2020
>games in 2020 in current gen consoles still can't run above 30FPS
>1310x873 screenshot taken while camera whas in motion
uhhhhhhhhhhh uhhh its blurry bro uuhhhh
You dont need more than 30 fps on console atleast not for single player games
This is such a tiresome discussion. Of course most console games have superior graphics because there are barely any AAA devs, if at all, that actually make PC games because they get more money for consoles. Every single game ever made could be vastly more graphically impressive if it were made for PCs first and every multiplat's PC version is obviously an upgrade. The only studios with the massive art teams and rnd departments capable of making pretty games are console first developers. It's such a disingenuous line of logic, none of you actually believe that PC components are inferior right?
Looks like shit get better material next time sucker.
Why are they making such a big deal about ssd in ps5 making load times go away when this game has very fast load times on base ps4
This. Consoles hold themselves to lower standards.
That's not true, but I gotta say ghost has better art design and atmosphere
>none of you actually believe that PC components are inferior right?
You overestimate the intelligence of Zig Forums.
Sure it will user, sure it will.
Lmao holy shit you're serious, aren't you? 30FPS is garbage even in SP, it directly affects the controls. I play games on PC at 144FPS whenever possible and switching back to 60 feels like a massive downgrade.
>this blurry mess is what consoleplebs tout as the peak of graphical fidelity