Why isn't there a single PC game that looks better or on par with TLOU2 or GOT ?

why isn't there a single PC game that looks better or on par with TLOU2 or GOT ?

Attached: 1595172127526.gif (356x200, 1.41M)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=u2NOhXH42NA
twitter.com/AnonBabble

because pc isn't owned by any company that funds developers to make first party games...

why would i want a game that looks good when i can have a game that plays good?

Looks do not matter if it's above GTA3 threshold.
Nothing sony shits out has any gameplay.

cope

cope with fucking what? The fact you have precisely 2 braincells that when rubbed together give you just enough brain power to breathe from your mouth?

Why doesn't nvidia make and fund games ?

Attached: t7it.png (1239x717, 1.35M)

Why doesn't Valve make and fund games?

But they just released one

Attached: hp.jpg (3840x2160, 937.36K)

Not sure if it counts as PC, but Half-Life Alyx is near photorealistic in certain areas, and 1000x more immersive because, surprise, it's VR.

the art-style they went with the Combine and Zombies is a little less realistic but that quickly goes away when you have a life-sized one next to you.

Attached: Screenshot-3532-1440x847.png (1440x847, 953.28K)

Assassins Creed Unity on PC looks better than both

Death Stranding on PC looks better than both.

>not sure of this pc game counts as pc
Uh okay. Anyway Alyx looks fucking superb but I wouldn't say photo realistic, there's a distinct art style even with most environments.

Death Stranding looks like MGSV with higher res textures

yes and it looks better than both

Nice interactive cutscene you have there

No, it doesn't

Because most of the studios don't like the idea of outsourcing asset creation to Chinese who basically work 24/7 for $800/month.

Attached: outsourcing.jpg (988x2148, 295.2K)

It's kinda stylized, not sure if its really photo realistic
Still very good though

Attached: 20200717214633_1.jpg (2169x2170, 767.64K)

It really doesnt. If you had actually played both on a screen in front of you the you would know this. Instead you blindly shit on everything you cant play and compare youtube videos of those games to the games you see in front of your eyes when you play. It's kind of sad really.

>Half life alyx
>Interactive cutscene
>Over the shoulder third person story-driven "muh graphics" playstation exclusive number 748.475.294
>not an interactive cutscene

user, look at the thread you're in. I don't think OP has any intention of having a good discussion. Too obsessed with jerking off his high polygon count that runs at a stunning 10 FPS.

>you cant play
I can and have bought a ps4. I played Uncharted 4 and GoW. I was impressed by the graphics in the former but not the latter. I don't know why people pretend that PC players simply are unable to play a PS4 game... it costs like $200 to get one and all the exclusives. I can play them any time I want. There is no barrier of entry. I am not coping, no sour grapes, etc. Logically that is not the scenario.

However, if you are poor or stupid (one usually follows the other) then you actually ARE unable to play games at high graphics settings and framerates on PC. So I could tell you
>you CAN'T play this.
and I would be right.

Attached: RDR2_2019_11_16_19_49_11_888.jpg (2560x1440, 2.47M)

>those games look better
>na-ha these look better
>STOP SHITTING THIS THREAD CUNT YOU DONT EVEN PLAY THOSE GAMES
autism

You sound assmolested, it's everything alright, fella?

based

RDR2
Battlefront 2
youtube.com/watch?v=u2NOhXH42NA

I just started playing it yesterday, and dear god the game is technical masterpiece. It gonna be hard going back to other VR games after playing this.

Which one?

Half-Life.

>Battlefront 2
Wow what a fun fun walking simulator, No combat just walking in that mod huh?

Yeah I played that before you were born got anything else?

i doubt you can play a game 10 years before it released but anyway, quake.

except there is crysis 2013 looks better than tlou2

PC fags don't care about grafix, just ef pee ess.