PC will always have more power

Because PC titles never get the big budget console titles do because the console market is far bigger. Console titles also have a greater focus on making shit visually appealing while having shallow gameplay to appeal to the lowest common denominator.
Consoles simply generate more profit/a greater ROI.
It's not exactly rocket science.

Attached: consider.jpg (569x428, 24.55K)

>Ghost of Tsushima
looks like shit tho.

Truly. And with high fps, thank you based nvidia and dlss 2.0
I can only imagine what wonders 3.0 will bring
Can you imagine dlss 3.0 being a control panel setting you could apply to anything? I'm getting hard just picturing it

this. Consolefags don't know that any multiplat on max settings looks better on PC than any console exclusive.

Also, Spider-Man and God of War do NOT look good. Just the character models, textures, and animations do.
Uncharted 4 looks worse than RDR2 on the same system. On PC RDR2 blows it out of the water.
HZD cut so many corners in order for the environment to look good. Static foliage, embarrassing LOD at medium distance, braindead NPCs, etc. You can see straight through the games graphical flaws.

While you're entirely correct I think OP's talking about exclusives.
Of course multiplats look and perform far better on PC. That's a given.

ur faggot ass, niiguuhhh

>modern Ubishit

Souless trash with shit atmosphere. I t will never look better than Ghost of Tsushima because of that.

Moreover if you put fucking niggers in a viking game you fail at looking KINO even if the graphics are superb.

Post orange.

The PC market is bigger than consoles and some PC titles get big budgets, but even smaller budget games tend to look good they just don't look like your realism chasing third person movie games so they are discounted. For example Anno games and RTS in general look really good but no one ever talks about their graphics.

Attached: NieRAutomata 2019-01-09 01-00-31.jpg (4480x2520, 2.09M)

Next gen could be the gen I stop upgrading my PC. If their promise of 60+ fps and 1440p is kept AND they have somewhat decent backwards compatibility, I think I might go xbox. Once DLSS 3 is out, I might come back to PC but not before 9th gen.

Attached: 1586486185312.png (550x627, 57.87K)

Your shit is running at 30 fps retard. Also you can spot the aliasing and blur in console screenshots from a mile away, you just aren't used to anything better

im mad i own no games that use dlss2 cus i want to try it out. only ones I know of are control (epic exclusive?) and this

Only a matter of time until it gets a pc release, thank you based sony, starting to wise up to the master race :^)

>I think OP's talking about exclusives.
He's just acting like a retard. Ryse and Hellblade looks better than all of those while sharing their art styles(excluding Spider-Man which doesn't even look good).

Why do you use the bullshot photomode to shill your companies game?

Attached: big think sattou.jpg (1200x811, 33.46K)

Ghost of Tsushima has really shitty textures and models, the good lighting carries it.

>console exclusives
>big studio
>long development cycles
>as much budget as you see fit

>pc "centric" developers
>shorter development cycles
>significantly smaller staff
>small budget and often have to beg on kickstarter

rocket science

Attached: 28104089196_0a3a411395_o.jpg (3426x1680, 1.35M)

Yeah I'm really looking forward to more titles having it. Horizon will have it

PC games always look better simply due to the fact that they are running at high frames. Console games look ''good'' only in screenshots. Everyone knows this.

High end PCs are too niche for big budget games.
You could lower the graphics settings, but developers prefer to make the game look as good as possible at the setting which most people will play at.

Attached: 1530187447048.png (1000x700, 921.87K)

>b-b-b-b-but photomade

Attached: 16135804489_d09a1c80e2_o.jpg (3040x1294, 2.19M)

who cares about exclusives? The better graphics and framerate are on PC, period. Why does it matter that you can play the game with worse graphics at 24fps on a console with a controller? It's not even the same game at that point anymore.

this your yearly Ubisoft title on PC looks better than any console exclusive
and thars not even mentioning shit like RDR2 or Battlefront absolutely destroying them even on the same platform

Attached: Ghost of Tsushima_20200718000359.png (1920x1080, 3.43M)

Attached: 15834625382_82a8f6c5b4_o.jpg (3840x2160, 1.77M)

>playing ubisoft games
The absolute state of pc. the worst animations on AAA open world games righ now. Gain some taste. I know the discussion is about graphics but come on

Because not everyone has an autism rig. PC devs have to account for the shittiest machine on earth running a game. And most PCfags are always "inbetween" building a machine, but they then get comfortable with their okay rigs that run shit from the early 2010s at 1080p 60fps and thus delay "upgrading." A console is a streamlined experience, meaning what's important is making the game, not taking into account how many different machines will run the game.

Looks like my guess was correct.

my favorite game
Elder Scrolls 6: The Wild Mordor

Opposed to playing games that copy and paste ubisoft gameplay mechanics?

Attached: 1510337373755.png (1920x1080, 1.73M)

>1920x1080
oh nonononononononononononon

Attached: +.gif (296x202, 650.65K)

Attached: 7492001.jpg (2560x1440, 2.32M)

I honestly don't get these games. If I want to take a walk outside, I'll go walk outside. If I want to do some random villager's chores, I can do that too easily enough irl. What about the game? Is it fun? Is there anything new or interesting to do, that you can't do by stepping out of your front door? What is it about? Does it have a meaningful story to tell? What is the point?

Pc market is bigger true, but its mostly 3rd worlders on toasters who pirate everything which is why consoles get the actual developers while mustards get indiepixelshit and 4 year old AAA ports.

someone post the Batman webm

Games like Ghost of Tsushima, Spider Man, and God of War don't run at native resolution and refresh rate. See The Order 1886 for how much you can pump the effects when you're barely above standard definition.