Is DLSS 2.0 that big of a deal...

Is DLSS 2.0 that big of a deal? Will I fuck myself over if I get a good old GTX 1080 TI instead of waiting for the new RTX to hopefully drop the prices on the current RTX, or even straight up getting a new one?

Attached: control-nvidia-dlss-2.0-comparison-004.png (850x750, 804.31K)

it is and not just for DLSS2.0 a lot of next-gen games will use raytracing to some extent and without it youre gonna be fucked with an inferior version provided you can even get an inferior version

Time to start saving up I guess. I just want to get something that will last me a good 5 years before I really feel the need to upgrade, like my current i5-4690k + GTX 970 did.

nvidia will dominate next gen with DLSS 3.0

>better graphics AND more fps
If, IF it's as good as it looks they really will.

why do people care about upscaling and fake AA? this shit, checkerboard rendering, mcable, it feels like a joke. it's like people are getting excited at sprite filters in emulators.

it looks better than native resolution and it increases performance

*simply solves next gen*

Attached: dlss.jpg (1920x1080, 914.1K)

You clearly have never seen it in your life, it looks better than native 4k at 1440p and gives like a 30-40% fps boost

It is as good as that, you can use it already in DS, control, metro exodus and it looks as good and gives the gains they claim.
Its caveat is that it needs to be given a ton of samples from a game to generate its algorithm or whatever the fuck, so its going to only be in games that are already partnered with nvidia

I honestly won't believe it until I see it. Too good to be true.

Will your broke ass ever be able to afford a new nvidia gpu? You can see it right now for yourself.

You should definitely hold out for an RTX if this is the case, DLSS is fucking wizardry, I think you'd be better off getting a 2070 over a 1080 ti at this point. Not shilling or coping here, I bought a 1080 recently and kind of wish I held out for the RTX shit now.

DLSS 1.0 really was bogus though

DLSS looks noticeably bad so no.

smoothtbrain retard, it's trained of 16k copies of the game, literally looks better than native 4k more times than not.

need an upgrade from my Vega56 any suggestions?

DLSS and nvidia raytracing will only be implemented in handful of games to market rtx cards. Did people forget game changer called PhysX? If new consoles used nvidia technology it would be great but they don't and Devs won't use it without nvidia sponsorship

Attached: NV_PHYSX_F_blk2.jpg (366x205, 37.2K)

I can't see a difference, why do people care about this/act like it's a big deal?

It literally looks better than native when i turn it on in games that have it, but tell me more about your compressed youtubes you watched on the phone your parents gave you, zoomer retard

How the fuck does an rtx2060 only pull 30fps at 4k?

I can get 30fps (with dips to 25) at 4k/ultra with the fidelity fx scaling on a 1660 super. That card should be doing much much better.

you can't see the difference between 30 fps and 60+ fps?

look at the top right corners you retard.

4k is this demanding especially as more and more effects have resolution dependent scaling

When they come out with DLSS 3.0 that can be applied to any game with TAA, past or present, then I will upgrade. Until then DLSS is a meme to me that only matters in garbage modern games like Control and Death Stranding.

>I can't see a difference
Look at the framerate, if it has no difference like you say then that means you're getting double FPS for nothing.

also it does look better, check out the container on the characters back and the dream catcher hanging from it on the right.

Hold up. so DLSS is just optimization?
Because I cannot tell difference between DLSS OFF and DLSS ON (Updated).
Also, what happened that they started to care about optimizing?

The human eye can only see the 12fps that guys toaster is capable of

DLSS 3.0 will 'just work' for any game that has TAA integrated, which is 90% of modern games.

Nobody cares

did nvidia sponsor death stranding?

Also theyre designing dlss 3.0 to work with any game that utilizes TAA. So checkmate amdautist.

DLSS ON is the game being rendered at only 1080p/1440p on the machine, with the 4K coming from machine learning trained on images of the game at 16k, basically you get 4k quality or better for the cost of 1080p performance, also check the framerate.

>I can't see a difference
Kind of the point I guess..

>with the 4K coming from machine learning trained on images of the game at 16k
That was only the case for DLSS 1.0 which is why hardly any games supported it.

well yeah, and I play in 1440p because of that but why is a $500 gpu only like 10% better than my $240 gpu??

>hurr muh FPS bullshit
Who cares? I can just turn on smoothing on my TV if I want it to look like a soap opera.

Its like the same shit as that tech theyve been showing off that restores old film to 4k basically. The DLSS on the game is actually rendering at 1440p, upscaling via this tech, and then outputting a 4k image that has higher fidelity than native 4k with AA on

So,can you 1080p 60 fps max settings for the next decade on a 2060 with DLSS?

Ether get a 2070 or wait for the 3000 series.
2060 is only 11% weaker than the 1080 but it has DLSS so it wins over it souly because of this.
All games from the current generation as in the PS4/Xbone generations will run at max settings on a 2060.

Attached: Capture.png (1123x619, 203.41K)

low quality bait

Please don't give this guy any yous besides this one

I bought a 2070 super with my trumpbux, turned that shit on, it was ugly, I turned it off.

I know what youre saying and i agree but its just the way this shit is right now but the benchmark is normal

The difference is visible to an extent.
Pay attention to the text on his backpack and overall texture on his clothes.
But that not even the biggest sell cheek the frame-rate.

Attached: 1593495123301.png (1604x2162, 976.23K)

Tell me the price after tax (CA) plz.

Thanks for headsup. I'm still stuck on GTX960 with 1080p/60FPS, so I am living under the rock for a while.

If the 2060 is rtx then yeah thats basically the idea behind DLSS- that and its the best form of AA yet

oh really? how are they doing it now?

Much like your brain

it's great, but like all Nvidia technologies (DLSS, Hairworks, PhysX etc) it will suffer from extremely poor adoption rates due to all consoles now being on incompatible AMD based hardware. Devs won't bother to implement it unless they are specifically paid by Nvidia
AMD will most likely develop their own half-assed equivalent which will be widely adopted due to openness and compatibility

Depends.
Supposedly 2060 is the power of a PS5.
You will at the least get performance of a PS5 but it can use DLSS2 so chances are it will outperfo0rm the PS5 simply because of this black sorcery of a technology.

Attached: 1590699191574.jpg (1000x667, 179.92K)

>UserBenchmark
Lmao, get out of here

Upgraded from a 970 to a 2080s last year maybe shouldve waited for the 3s but im not dissapointed at all

1.0 version had issues.
These are practically invisible on 2.0

Has anyone else noticed that this games performance doesn't really scale logically with resolution changes?
1440p I get 60fps(vsync) with dips to 53
1080p I get 60fps with dips to 55.
Turning off motion blur gives me stable 60 and the game actually looks way better without it.

Yeah thats what i said like two posts above you dude

What's the point of getting a current gen high-end GPU when the new ones are just around the corner? That's retarded, not poorfaggotry.

>Will I fuck myself over if I get a good old GTX 1080 TI instead of waiting for the new RTX
Yes that would be the worst mistake of your life, you will miss raytracing, DLSS, RTX voice and that's the worst timing to buy a graphics card.

You just cant afford one generally speaking.