Scientists say life is around 30fps

>scientists say life is around 30fps
>Zig Forums insists 60fps in games is not a meme and you can actually perceive it

well which is it retards

Attached: 45.png (2116x2160, 498.21K)

Life is a lot more than 30fps, the brain/eyes might only be able to process or notice up until a certain level.

Science does not say shit about 30 fps I don't know where you got that ridiculous idea from.

Science says that you can perceive whatever FPS you can perceive. Science doesn't just declare shit, it bases its statements on tests, so why don't you do some science yourself and find out which FPSs you are no longer able to see a difference in. That's how science works.

That's total bullshit. My old ass grandmother can only see at around 18 FPS due to ancient hardware. After 1945, the Juden released a new revision that allows much better thermal performance.

so then how come you can you perceive the difference between 30 and 60 you fag

Anything over 30 fps is a placebo. If you take someone who has no understanding of fps and ask them to tell you the difference between 30, 60, or 144 they wont notice anything. It will all look the same to them.

The human eye and brain don't work in framerates at all.

>take off glasses/contacts
>everything looks like it's 30fps unless it's directly in my face
>put them back on
>looks like 60fps

Actually your brain's motion tracking ability is limited to about 13Hz, so even 30fps is in the realm of diminishing returns and won't help you track motion any better

Attached: fps.gif (460x359, 76.56K)

30fps looks best.
60fos looks like weird and reminds me of a cheap TV show

Good lord, old Zig Forums was so cringe

why

do

you

type

like

this

this

is

not

reddit

double spacing improves readability you election tourist retard

Don't call me a retard or you'll regret it

>Grow up with PAL TV
>50hz looks "normal"
It's crazy.

kill yourself

whydoyouthinkpeopleneedtotypelikethisinstead?

Life isn't measured in FPS, there is literally no way to measure how fast life moves by our eyes.

the amount of console coping is too much

Attached: 1555634805479.png (4175x2596, 1.54M)

>30fps looks best.
Because your lizard brain is used to it.

what a fucking shit thread

kill yourself and also never post here again

>>scientists say life is around 30fps
source?

Technically we see everything at the speed of light though right?
It would be slowed down by the speed your eyes/retinas/brain could process it but still.

Why does Zig Forums still reply to such bait?
If not actually bait why do you think such retards deserve to be spoon fed?

right i mean we have an idea of how the eyes/brain interact, but we will quite literally never know because that shit is literally down to the fucking neuron level and we have no effective way of knowing how neurons react right now, or if we will ever.

We just make theories and reason them to be true, but for all we know our brains could quite literally be fucking magic

shamicock

Fps doesnt exist in the physical world man. Sorry

>> be God tier and play at 45fps and laugh at both 30 and 60 fps plebs
I'm the best of both worlds prove me wrong you cucks

NotTheguyyouRepliedtoButMyBoyHeretypesHisSongnamesAllLikeThis

Attached: 523252.jpg (960x960, 345.38K)

Scientist here, it's actually closer to 23 FPS

It's the best of neither as you don't have 30 fps or 60 fps.

In our own eyes, maybe. The rate would be highly variable on things like age, wakefulness, substances, mood, past experiences, etc. Planck time is the smallest unit of time we could define and theoretically measure with instruments - but in practice it'd be far coarser. So the universe could have a framerate in way, it's just our game clients of existence likely can't achieve anything close to that. Our personal biological rate would be defined by the switching frequency of our neurons.

How many pixels do we see in? 8K?

this dude is lying to you and is a scientist funded by billy gates it's actually closer to 15.

Only newfags think reddit spacing is real.
GRFO

Attached: -an- - Animals & Nature.png (1263x4594, 632.7K)