Reminder that competitive FPS is the only reason to get a modern PC otherwise you are wasting your money on what could...

Better performance and mods are why PC gaming is superior but yeah.
If neither of those are an issue to you, you're better off sticking to copesoles.

Small PCs were a thing for a while now.

You say that as if it contradicts what he said.

You can get a laptop that outperform a console pretty easily.

>Most single player games run at 60 fps with little exception
I literally do not remember the last time I played a AAA pc game that was locked at 60. Actually it may have been Skyrim fucking 9 years ago.

Why do some many people even care what other people game on

The fact that there are people who think there is even an argument to be had on this subject is laughable. Imagine thinking you know shit about vidya games when you play all your shit on a toy that is designed to deliver gaming to average joes.

It's like driving a Prius and thinking you're even in the same category as somebody who built and fine tuned a race car from the ground up. You do not and will never know shit about vidya if your primary method of playing is on a console. It's fine if you're just a some guy who plays games sometimes and doesn't really care about the medium beyond the surface level, but if you consider it your primary hobby you're likely broke white trash with a room temp IQ.

Reminder that this is true for all consoles.
Switch just runs rare stuff that would run at 60 on PS4 at 30.
All the big system sellers on the PS4 run at 30 fps or less on the base model.

Attached: Wrestle.jpg (1443x1080, 160.69K)

And the pro often only gives you stable 30 fps.
Or unlocked FPS that targets 60 but is never stable 60.

>Adobe Photoshop
>writing code
>build own Websites
>Video Encoding
>Data-Storage
>competitive FPS is the only reason to get a modern PC

Yeah,sure, kid.

I don't understand how can anyone unironically be a consolefag in 2020
They're objectively weaker, have less games, have no mods, can't even do anything beyond vidya, why would anyone choose a console instead of a PC?

>making custom wallpaper engine scenes for money
Can't do this on a console

they always have one argument
>its le cheaper

nintendo has more 60 fps games than the cinematic experience station

a single
>2GB Gainward GeForce GTX 1050
already costs over $150 and that thing barely runs RDR2 which has you overclocking it because of its pisspoor 2GB vram

you could pay double and get a working machine that runs everything on good graphics without wasting another $500 to scramble together a budget PC that is too weak for everything anyway, consoles are for playing and PCs are for office work

rx 580 runs rdr2 better than any console.

>rx 580
valid point

I sold my console because i literally just don't play console games. No other reason.

>as somebody who built and fine tuned a race car from the ground up
no one does this besides F1, NASCAR, DTM, Super GT and LMP1 teams you fucking retard

Performance, Mods, and backwards compatibility for me. There is so many games on PC that it is insane. Also, you can pirate games to try them out before buying them.

Attached: High_resolution_wallpaper_background_ID_77701154839.jpg (1920x1080, 262.19K)

PC is better because of backwards compatibility and emulation. Maybe it was because the PS4's original games did nothing for me in comparison to the PS3's original games, but I'm fucking sick of old games being lost to time for seemingly no reason. As consoles become glorified PCs the generation gating becomes harder to forgive. Xbox has really moved up in my eyes for taking backwards compatibility so seriously. It doesn't make up for their otherwise total lack of games, but it's still nice to see.

>Reminder that even on PC, most single player games run at 60fps with little exception.
False and Genderqueer

> grand strategy?
> RTS?
> Simulators?
> VR?

call me when the only good games (really niche indieshit) happen on consoles