...b-but Zig Forums told me it was a bad game!
yes it was
Zig Forums was right
A shit souls game is still way better than a lot of games out there and if you could manage the soul memory the pvp is at least really good
Pretty much this
Just because it is the Worst souls game doesn't make it a bad game. It's still leaps and bounds above most of the Souls-like imitators.
It did a lot of cool unique stuff for the series too and some of the bosses are quite memorable. Area design is cludgy as fuck though and exploration is a big part of what makes souls games good. One of the only reasons I think DaS 3 is better than 2. 1 is still king of the trilogy though.
For once Zig Forums was right.
lmao fucking filtered by the most accessible game in the series
Yes.
>most accessible
What? Dark Souls 2, for better or for worse, is easily the hardest Souls game. That's why it filtered 90% of players.
There's a difference between "bad game" and "the worst souls game".
Whoever that Zig Forums is, he was right. But then again, you clowns pretend Witcher is a good ARPG so knock yourselves out.
>practically infinite healing
How is it the hardest game exactly? I was able to cheese almost every boss by relying on my inexhaustible amount of healing gems.
Only hard parts are Ancient Hitbox Dragon, Horsefuck Valley (which is easy once you know the path) and Fume Knight if you don't destroy all idols.
using words like "worst" implies it's bad period
THIS
with the dlc it's great, vanilla ds2 is shit
>Dark Souls 2, for better or for worse, is easily the hardest Souls game.
Accessible != Easy
The DLC is the hardest in the series and possible late game too. But the early game has so many options of where to go and open to different playstyles, it's very easy to just pick up and play.
DLC is just turbo vanilla, polished garbage. It's a miracle we got Shulva out of it, probably one of the few areas that survived from the original DaS2.
It's not a bad game, but it has many issues and ends up being the worst souls game.
I played it the day it came out, and yes it is the worst Souls game. Kind of funny that the best game came out right afterwards
Bloodborne > Demons Souls = Sekiro > Dark Souls >>> SOTFS > Dark Souls 3 >>> Dark Souls 2
Cope, seethe, suck my cock, swallow my cum, slit your wrists, beg my forgiveness, perish.
They were right, faggot
>garbage opinion
>likes the worst area in the whole game
like clockwork
>nooooooooooooooo where are my infinite poise giant humanoid chokepoints
>is this actual level design? disgusting! I wish the ground was more horizontal and fucking empty
>actual level design
>lol we watched indiana jones and the last crusade and made a level
And even that one is littered with "we have this old asset but no clue what to do with it" shit like that pagan tree or amateurish design like the half a dozen chests next to each other, half of which have the same item, like some cheap mmorpg.
>lol we watched indiana jones and the last crusade and made a level
You made it sound even better than it is. What did Tanimura watch to make the rest of the game anyway? Some ground leveling documentary?
Takeshi's Castle and a documentation anout the Winchester Mystery House.
>What did Tanimura watch to make the rest of the game anyway?
Empire of Dust
it's all shitposting.
Play it, enjoy it, then come back here and shit on it and/or praise it as the best fromsoft game
Have they never fixed the controller deadzone issues? I have to shrink them all the way to make them like Dark Souls 3 and Remastered
I think your controller might be shit, I've never had that problem
I'm using the xbox one controller and without configuring anything you move like a tank. There are also lots of reports from 2014-2015 about people using DS2fix and getting banned, namely to fix the deadzones so I know I'm not the only one.
No. It's a design choice, enjoy. :^)