Can anyone explain to me how the fuck this isn’t the standard by now?

>whole main point of the leap between PS1 to PS1 wasn’t graphics

Going from wobbly polygons on pre-rendered backgrounds to fully 3D with textures that aren't warped was huge.

OP here

I’ve always been a consolefag due to growing poor as fuck and not having the space.

We were promised better frame rates each gen but it’s just gotten worse, not trying to make it a console war thing.

True, but we got an improved framerate with it, since then it’s gotten worse.

>seemed to of
seemed to have

Imagine that this 100% is the fixed hardware performance. If you push 60fps you need 50% of the hardware performance while 30fps would only need 25%. You know for fact that graphics sell games and help in showing prettier screenshots for the marketing to entice people... What would you do?
Most devs just choose higher visual quality because that is what sells. You drop frames and make a prettier looking game.

>Can anyone explain to me how the fuck this isn’t the standard by now?
How the hell is it not the standard? 60 Hz is basically the minimum refresh rate of PC monitors and it's the most common target for acceptable performance in PC games. Nobody who plays on PC targets anything below 60 fps.

Oh, you're talking about console games? lmao

Attached: lul.png (1120x1120, 10.81K)

You can't take a screenshot of framerate which means its not as easy to market. Simple as.

huh. there's plenty of games on pc that run 30 fps. that faggot you posted even made some kind of 60 fps cult on steam that marked 60 fps games.
it's all brainwashed people these 60 fpssers. don't play games. only watch options menu and whine about fps. you're crazy man.

Because they've been pushing resolution.

720p expectation with games cheating to 600p
1080p expectation with games cheating to 900p
2160p expectation with games cheating to 1440p or lower

Once they run out of room on this track (and it is coming, 4k will be the stopping point for most commercial TVs) they'll be forced to advertise other things. No one but nerds knew what resolution a game was running in before the 7th generation. Frame rate will see a similar boost in recognition in the 10th generation.

Shitty console ports being locked at 30 fps doesn't invalidate my argument about 60 fps being the standard performance target for games actually developed for PC.

You are mentally retarded.

Cope
Can your console run counterstrike in 144fps? I dont think so

Popularizing my ass is what PC gamers are doing. Surveys show that the grand majority of Pc gamers play on potato rigs that can hardly complete with current gen consoles.
Benchmarks also show that Top tier cards in the $1,000's can hardly push 60fps once ray tracing is engaged too.

only blizzard and valve develope pc game once every 5-10 years

...

beside some really weird gamemaker games or console ports i can't think of game designed for pc in mind with a 30fps lock

Nigger, I'm getting solid 60 - 75 on metro exodus on a rtx 2070 with dlss off. What fucking potato rigs are people running. Metro exodus is even badly optimized and I still can use ray tracing and play solid 60 with no dips below that

>Call of Duty keeps pushing for targeted 60fps, is arguably the largest AAA annual franchise
>No one else bothers

I'm not going to debate with some ESL that can't stop adding E's to the end of shit

Why roleplay as if youre some kind of majority, virgin?
Multiplayer games go to die on PC, because its a platform of poorfags playing f2pshit from 10 years ago

Warzone, an f2p game from THIS year, has pcvirgins outnumbered 10to1 in every single lobby. And thats with console owners who bother to play with pc cheaters

>multiplayer games go to die on pc
You must be retarded or this is some quality bait.

I think a bigger problem is the fact that there are no games to play. I will worry about 60fps after I find something fun.

I was pointing out that you are in fact a total glue gulping retard and what you said about ray tracing was so fucking wrong that you are just a console hugger who can't stand that PC's have the better experience than console. I don't give a fuck about who is the majority, I never argued that, I was pointing out your console cope and this retarded cycle of "Muh PC killer console" every 5 years and its always wrong

Attached: 8b1.png (1126x845, 665.84K)

>buh-bu-bait
there it is, bub has nothing to say
I also liked the part where the humble brag about metro exodus didnt come with resolution

Normies are simply shallow retards that drag everyone else down.

i never once heard anyone talk about frame rate back in those days, as long as it was stable
people only cared about more pixels and cool effects and lighting

normie money speaks louder

this is why we have to drive the normies out of the hobby. if any normalfag starts talking to you about vidya look at them with disgust and call them a manchild.

Attached: 091[1].gif (500x284, 1.6M)

Devilish

Attached: 1432566035107.png (500x567, 68.61K)

The only cope Im seeing is coming from the designated platform of literal niggers 90% of whom are stuck playing dota2, csgo, warframe, and league of legends in 1080p

then we get literal virgins who instead of falling for "pc killer" consoles, listen to some gook in a leather jacket pushing apple-tier overpriced garbage that is pretty much needed in order to bruteforce unoptimized ports otherwise youre gonna be playing in 1080p with shadows off in 2 years

Consoles are pushing 4k. PCs arent pushing shit, in fact most of you game on shit weaker than the boneX

nobody cared about framerate in the slightest. it is a recent woman's concern coming from pathetic pc gamers

>Consoles are pushing 4k
Oh no, he's retarded. He doesn't know a 2080super was doing this since last year
>PCs arent pushing shit
Are you seriously this out of touch with the actual details of PC gaming? Linus was playing 8k a week ago.

Here's the result of the latest Steam hardware survey. For reference, the 1060 is a 4 and a half year old gpu and about equivalent to the Xbox One X. The 2080 and 2080ti are both at ~1%. So 2% of Steam users already have "next gen" performance.

Notice what's missing from the list, the RTX 30 series and rdna2 gpus. Console hardware is a generation behind, as usual. It's just the way things work. There's a limit to how much hardware Sony and Microsoft can pack into a box and still hit a $500 price point. AMD need their cut too, they can't just give shit away for free. By spring your PS5 will be equivalent to a midrange gaming PC.

Attached: sep2020.png (392x644, 76.53K)

totalbiscuit may he rip in cancer, the quintessential pc gamer, shilled 60fps like it was his job actually
it was one of the main reasons his mustard fanboys like him

now that we have xbox hitting 60, it doesnt matter

and just like 99% of pcnigs didnt upgrade to 2080, most of you wont upgrade to 3080

whereas in a month ALL xbox owners will have a 2080tier console with a ryzen tier cpu
I know this makes you mad, but please cope already

pfhahahahah
1 fuckin percent
wake up

>whereas in a month ALL xbox owners will have a 2080tier console

LUL HAHAHAHAH faggot, you really didn't see the fps benches for the consoles did you? During any major scene in a game the fucking fps drops to 37fps

I'll be upgrading to a 3070super come their launch and I will still be smug when I can run 4k at 120 fps with no dips and you struggle with 3k at 40fps on average

user a 1060 is better than a PS4 Pro...

*4k

Because normies can comprehend the difference between 1080p and 4K better than 30fps to 60 fps. If you never gamed on a PC 30 fps just feels normal to people

why dont you post a screenshot of yourself running any graphically intense game?

120 should be the standard